search for: phase1

...; (diffLRPosition <- abs(PriorLRPosition - SimuLRPosition)) [1] 0.15641679 0.05365366 0.04032931 0.12596418 0.15641679 0.05365366 0.04032931 [8] 0.12596418 > output <- cbind(output,diffLRPosition) > (NbOFPriorLRPosition <- nrow(output)/2) [1] 4 > > for (LRPhase  in c(-1,1)) + {Phase1 <- output[output[,2]==LRPhase,]} > > Phase1 <- Phase1[order (Phase1[,6]),] > Phase1   OptimYear LRPhase   PriorLRPosition     OptimPosition SimuLRPosition 7      2009       1 0.959670688361124 0.199612536004054              1 6      2009       1  1.05365365779321 0.282266634171568 ...

...-aliases -fuse-init-array -target-cpu cortex-a8 -target-abi aapcs-linux -mfloat-abi hard -target-linker-version 2.24.90.20141023 -dwarf-column-info -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -coverage-file But it's a Cortex-A7, not A8, how do I convince the test-release.sh or build scripts to make Phase1 clang target Cortex A7 for Phase2? (with vfpv4-d16) Whilst we're at it, I'm not convinced that the Pi2 would make a great cross-compilation machine, so is it possible to reduce the enabled targets? "X86 Sparc PowerPC ARM AArch64 Mips XCore MSP430 CppBackend NVPTX Hexagon SystemZ R...

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Phase1 fails to build on openSUSE 13.2, can anyone see what's wrong from this log file? On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On...

...setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 14.04 running Samba 4.0.0. Even though it is running Samba 4, we are using configs from Samba3. - Roles: DC, DNS , DHCP and Shares - Database: TDB - DNS: BIND9 - Clients: Mix of Windows 7 and 10 joined to the domain Here is what we are planning, high level Phase1: - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing domain - Promote this server as BDC, migrate the DNS, DHCP - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the old server Phase2: - Take a copy of the new samba DC VM and test NT4 to AD migration usin...

...rvey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........ ...................ok defunct.... phase2 ok..........85....0.....85 .......defunct......5...10.....15 sum................90...10....100 That is in R: fail <- data.frame(id=1:1000 , x=c(rep(0,920), rep(1,80)), y=c(rep(0,985), rep(1,15)), n1=rep(1000,1000), n2=rep(100,1000), N=rep(5000,...

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , > - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server > - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the...

Hi, I am new to ipsec and trying to connect my bsd server with win 2000. I have succeeded to tunnel using pre-shared key. But regarding certificate , I failed to get success. The following are configuration : racoon.conf path certificate "/usr/local/openssl/certs" ; # "log" specifies logging level. It is followed by either "notify",

...oposal.c:862:printsatrns(): (trns_id=RIJNDAEL encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2004-04-27 20:52:18: DEBUG: remoteconf.c:129:getrmconf(): anonymous configuration selected for 10.0.0.10. 2004-04-27 20:52:18: INFO: isakmp.c:1694:isakmp_post_acquire(): IPsec- SA request for 10.0.0.10 queued due to no phase1 found. 2004-04-27 20:52:18: DEBUG: isakmp.c:803:isakmp_ph1begin_i(): === 2004-04-27 20:52:18: INFO: isakmp.c:808:isakmp_ph1begin_i(): initiate new phase 1 negotiation: 10.0.0.1[500]<=>10.0.0.10[500] 2004-04-27 20:52:18: INFO: isakmp.c:813:isakmp_ph1begin_i(): begin Aggressive mode. 2004-04-...

...HOUT_LIB - Failed > -- Looking for __atomic_load_8 in atomic > -- Looking for __atomic_load_8 in atomic - not found > CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:75 (message): > Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it. > > Interestingly, Phase1 does *not* suffer from this, but there the "host compiler" is clang 6.0.0. > > Phase1 CMake output: > > Performing C++ SOURCE FILE Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB succeeded with the following output: > Change Dir: /home/dim/llvm/7.0.0/rc1/Phase1/Release/llvmCore...

Dear WizaRds, I tried to construct a two-phase sampling design in Survey just the way I hoped understood in Vienna - I was wrong. I think I am too stupid to create the correct subset for phase 2. Phase1: Sample 1000 parts with 80 defective. Phase2: Sample 100 parts out of these 1000 with 15 defective. 0:ok, 1:defunct. The table below gives the conditional sampling values. Please help me: library(survey) ss1 <- data.frame(id=1:1000, ph1.x=rep(c(1,0),c(10,990)), subset=rep(c(1,0),c(100,900)...

...lang if only > for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using > Werror. > > Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and > from GCC in order to keep Werror clean. > I've dug around a bit, and it looks to me like separating phase1 and phase2 behavior is going to be a bit tricky (looking at zorg [*]) as long as we want -Wno-error as the default for buildbots. So, the first thing I would propose is to add this buildbot and run it for a while, just to see what the current background rate of breakages will be. I think getting a...

...ease of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. > > Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep Werror clean. > > I've dug around a bit, and it looks to me like separating phase1 and phase2 behavior is going to be a bit tricky (looking at zorg [*]) as long as we want -Wno-error as the default for buildbots. > > So, the first thing I would propose is to add this buildbot and run it for a while, just to see what the current background rate of breakages will be. I think...

My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep

...setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 12.04 running Samba 3.6.3. Even though it is running Samba 4, we are using configs from Samba3. - Roles: DC, DNS , DHCP and Shares - Database: TDB - DNS: BIND9 - Clients: Mix of Windows 7 and 10 joined to the domain Here is what we are planning, high level Phase1: - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing domain - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the old server Phase2: - Take a...

...let at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > > sure if it is valid > > > > Here is what we are planning, high level > > Phase1: > > > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the > existing > > domain > > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , > > - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server > > - Demote the old Samba box as Domain C...

...Peer IP and your Private IP in our device. They indicated xxxx.xxxx.xxxx/24 as format for the Private IP. The settings you need to know at our end are the following (remote site info is given below) Peer IP: 194.237.227.202 Server IP: 192.168.0.2 / 255.255.255.255 Pre-shared key: d769hdsKJ Ike, Phase1: 3des, sha, dh2 Ipsec, Phase2: 3des, sha Now, Could you pls let me know the suitable VPN pkg for the above configurations. Can I use Open VPN? What about Open Swan or Free Swan ? I prefer to install RPMs. Where can I find RPMs for the right pkg? I googled and found some info. Below is the URL...

...ng inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 163882, i_size is 199041, should be 262144. Fix? The real size of my file is 199041 ! So if I choose "Yes" to the question, This file will be corrupted. Additional info : my device Block size is 4096 I think there is an error in the test code of the phase1. What do you think ? Do I need to open a bugzilla for this very serious problem for us or do I miss something ? I tested this case with e2fsprogs-1.39-cfs8 and e2fsprogs-cfs2 and I didn''t find a ChangeLog for e2fsprogs provided by CFS. So perhaps this problem is corrected in another r...

...LLVM/Clang. But I have trouble with tweaking test-release.sh so that it can compile with "-fno-strict-aliasing" option. You can see the script I modified at [2]. Although I set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to "-fno-strict-aliasing", I see no "-fno-strict-aliasing" in llvm.make-Phase1-Release.log, seems CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS don't work. Do you know the correct way to enable/disable compiler options? Thanks! :) Regards, chenwj [1] http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/regression-test.txt [2] http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/test-release.txt -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋...

...> in gpu activity. > > I can't immediately think of something better, though. Yeah, I was wondering about that as well. Especially since I wanted to add some more flags in the future when for example a bandwidth quota how much memory can be moved in/out is exceeded. Something like phase1, phase2, phase3 etc..., but that's also not very descriptive either. Going to take a look at XE as well, thanks for the notice. Regards, Christian. > > /Thomas > > >> Regards, >> Christian. >> >>