search for: phase2

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name APFloat.cpp -mrelocation-model pic -pic-level 2 -mthread-model posix -fmath-errno -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -fuse-init-array -target-c...

...Another new problem with the test-release.sh script is that it can cause the whole machine (!) to run out of memory, when comparing phase 2 with phase 3, due to the following fragment: 470 echo "# Comparing Phase 2 and Phase 3 files" 471 for p2 in `find $llvmCore_phase2_objdir -name '*.o'` ; do 472 p3=`echo $p2 | sed -e 's,Phase2,Phase3,'` 473 # Substitute 'Phase2' for 'Phase3' in the Phase 2 object file in 474 # case there are build paths in the debug info. On some systems, 475...

...two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........ ...................ok defunct.... phase2 ok..........85....0.....85 .......defunct......5...10.....15 sum................90...10....100 That is in R: fail <- data.frame(id=1:1000 , x=c(rep(0,920), rep(1,80)), y=c(rep(0,985), rep(1,15)), n1=rep(1000,1000), n2=rep(100,1000), N=rep(5000,1000)) des.fail <- twophase(id=list(~id,~i...

''rake rails:update'' is causing the below error for me when trying to upgrade my application. I''ve scowered Google and didn''t find much, has anyone else had this problem and solved it? C:\@cs\phase2>rake rails:update --trace (in C:/@cs/phase2) rake aborted! Don''t know how to build task ''rails:update'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1449:in `[]'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:455:in `[]'' c:/ruby/lib/rub...

...7 and 10 joined to the domain Here is what we are planning, high level Phase1: - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing domain - Promote this server as BDC, migrate the DNS, DHCP - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the old server Phase2: - Take a copy of the new samba DC VM and test NT4 to AD migration using the classic upgrade The urgency is do get Phase1 done but Phase2 is approved. What we would like to know if conceptually the above makes sense and is doable? The bit we are not very sure about is Adding the BDC and demoting...

...e wifi card driver. Currently the two programs aren't seamlessly integrated, so I need to write my own config file for IWD that has username / password settings. Such as ~ # cat /var/lib/iwd/MySSID.8021x [Security] EAP-Method=PEAP EAP-Identity=NETWORK-1\\anonymous EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Method=MSCHAPV2 EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Identity=NETWORK-1\\jonesmz EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Password=PASSWORD-GOES-HERE [Settings] AutoConnect=true However, what I'd really like to do is have a linux domain member first attempt to use the machine account to authenticate with the freeradius /...

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

...mulating a scenario of projected market loss ratio : ########################################################## LRScenar  <-  function(PriorLR,Phase,LRUpBound ,LRLowBound,TransitCoefMean,TransitCoefStdDev,LTMeanComputYearNb) {  initial  <- PriorLR                       LRScenar  <-  NULL  phase2  <-  Phase  SigmaLog  <-  (log(1+(TransitCoefStdDev /TransitCoefMean)^2))^0.5  MuLog  <-  log(TransitCoefMean)-SigmaLog^2/2  for (i in 1:LTMeanComputYearNb)  {  kk <- rlnorm(1, meanlog = MuLog, sdlog = SigmaLog)  if (phase2!=1) kk  <-  (1/kk)  x_1  <-  initial*kk  initial  <- ...

...ba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , > - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server > - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the > old server > > Phase2: > - Take a copy of the new samba DC VM and test NT4 to AD migration using the > classic upgrade > > The urgency is do get Phase1 done but Phase2 is approved. > > What we would like to know if conceptually the above makes sense and is > doable? The bit we are not very sure ab...

...ake: *** [SingleSource/.makeall] Error 2 As told by Chris Lattner*, *I tested my llvm-gcc like this: [qali at qali test-suite]$ llvm-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/nicholas/2.8-final/llvmgcc42-2.8.src/configure --prefix=/home/nicholas/2.8-final/Phase2/Release/llvmgcc42-2.8.install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/nicholas/2.8-final/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-2.8.obj --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2.8) I also tried reconfigure llvm from...

...-------------------- Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d

...39;d like to find out what the >> status is of the branch on our various platforms. >> >> Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. > > Hmm, I'm running into a rather nasty snag now on i386-freebsd11, due to our lack of atomic 64 bit primitives; Phase2's configure dies with: > > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB - Failed > -- Look...

Dear WizaRds, I tried to construct a two-phase sampling design in Survey just the way I hoped understood in Vienna - I was wrong. I think I am too stupid to create the correct subset for phase 2. Phase1: Sample 1000 parts with 80 defective. Phase2: Sample 100 parts out of these 1000 with 15 defective. 0:ok, 1:defunct. The table below gives the conditional sampling values. Please help me: library(survey) ss1 <- data.frame(id=1:1000, ph1.x=rep(c(1,0),c(10,990)), subset=rep(c(1,0),c(100,900)), ph2.y=rep(c(1,0,NA),c(15,85,900)), n1=rep(1...

...ams aren't seamlessly integrated, so I need to write my own config > file for IWD that has username / password settings. Such as > > > ~ # cat /var/lib/iwd/MySSID.8021x > [Security] > EAP-Method=PEAP > EAP-Identity=NETWORK-1\\anonymous > EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Method=MSCHAPV2 > EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Identity=NETWORK-1\\jonesmz > EAP-PEAP-Phase2-Password=PASSWORD-GOES-HERE > > [Settings] > AutoConnect=true > > However, what I'd really like to do is have a linux domain member first > attempt to use the machine acco...

...y. -Chris On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Qingan Li wrote: > Hi Chris, > > [qali at qali SingleSource]$ llvm-gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Configured with: /home/nicholas/2.8-final/llvmgcc42-2.8.src/configure --prefix=/home/nicholas/2.8-final/Phase2/Release/llvmgcc42-2.8.install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/nicholas/2.8-final/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-2.8.obj --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2.8) > > [qali at qali...

On 19 Jul 2015, at 00:17, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 17 Jul 2015, at 01:09, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >>> On 17 Jul 2015, at 00:31, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear

...************* > > The lldb test failures look like this: > > FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test (32116 of 32394) > ******************** TEST 'lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test' FAILED ******************** > Script: > -- > /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.install/usr/local/bin/clang++ /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Inputs/anonymous-struct.cpp -g -o /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test.tmp && /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0...

Hi Bill, I forgot to do Phase2/Phase3 build. Here is the Phase3 regression test result, http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/phase3-regression-test.txt Most LLVM failures are gone. As for ExecutionEngine, I guess ARM JIT is not at a good shape at this moment, right? Perhaps we should focus on Clang failures? Regards, ch...

...high level Phase1: - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing domain - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the old server Phase2: - Take a copy of the new samba DC VM and test NT4 to AD migration using the classic upgrade The urgency is do get Phase1 done but Phase2 is approved. What we would like to know if conceptually the above makes sense and is doable? The bit we are not very sure about is Adding the BDC and demoting...

...n it to the > existing > > domain > > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3 environment , > > - Migrate the DNS, DHCP from Samba 3 to Samba 4 server > > - Demote the old Samba box as Domain Controller, leave the Shares in the > > old server > > > > Phase2: > > - Take a copy of the new samba DC VM and test NT4 to AD migration using > the > > classic upgrade > > > > The urgency is do get Phase1 done but Phase2 is approved. > > > > What we would like to know if conceptually the above makes sense and is > > d...