It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: yum list | grep "radius" freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 installed freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base According to freeradius.org, this was released 8/17/04 and 1.1.0 was released 1/12/06 Why is the distributed version so far behind? Also I am trying to figure out how to get dialup_admin working. I cannot find any reference to it, how to get it working within Apache and access it.... (Hopefully Alan is here at IETF, and can help me).
On 3/20/06, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> wrote:> It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: > > yum list | grep "radius" > freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 > installed > freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > According to freeradius.org, this was released 8/17/04 and 1.1.0 was > released 1/12/06 > > Why is the distributed version so far behind?For centos, the answer is "Because that''s what upstream provides". For upstream, no idea what their reasoning is. Keep in mind that the idea isn''t to have the latest&greatest, but to have a stable solution. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety'''' Benjamin Franklin 1775
At 03:14 PM 3/20/2006, Jim Perrin wrote:>On 3/20/06, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> wrote: > > It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: > > > > yum list | grep "radius" > > freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 > > installed > > freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > > > freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > > > freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > > > According to freeradius.org, this was released 8/17/04 and 1.1.0 was > > released 1/12/06 > > > > Why is the distributed version so far behind? > >For centos, the answer is "Because that''s what upstream provides". >For upstream, no idea what their reasoning is. >Keep in mind that the idea isn''t to have the latest&greatest, but to >have a stable solution.Well, OK. 1.1.0 just came out, everything until then was patches to 1.0 ... Just got off the phone with DeKok (work with him at the IETF, when he comes), and he helped me along. The upstream does not include user_admin tool. Got enough working for what I need this week.>-- >"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary >safety deserve neither liberty nor safety'''' >Benjamin Franklin 1775 >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS@centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Robert Moskowitz wrote:> Just got off the phone with DeKok (work with him at the IETF, when he > comes), and he helped me along. The upstream does not include user_admin > tool. > > Got enough working for what I need this week.Please file a bug upstream on this missing tool (radmin, or some such I assume) - I am still packaging diffs to cistron-radius personally, for the ISPs I support, and would prefer to move to FreeRadius for new installs. -- Russ Herrild
At 08:15 PM 3/20/2006, R P Herrold wrote:>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>Just got off the phone with DeKok (work with him at the IETF, when >>he comes), and he helped me along. The upstream does not include >>user_admin tool. >> >>Got enough working for what I need this week. > >Please file a bug upstream on this missing tool (radmin, or some >such I assume) - I am still packaging diffs to cistron-radius >personally, for the ISPs I support, and would prefer to move to >FreeRadius for new installs.How do I file a bug upstream?>-- Russ Herrild >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS@centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 20:32 -0600, Robert Moskowitz wrote:> At 08:15 PM 3/20/2006, R P Herrold wrote: > >On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > >>Just got off the phone with DeKok (work with him at the IETF, when > >>he comes), and he helped me along. The upstream does not include > >>user_admin tool. > >> > >>Got enough working for what I need this week. > > > >Please file a bug upstream on this missing tool (radmin, or some > >such I assume) - I am still packaging diffs to cistron-radius > >personally, for the ISPs I support, and would prefer to move to > >FreeRadius for new installs. > > How do I file a bug upstream? >http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060320/2d67c826/attachment.bin
Robert Moskowitz wrote:> It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: > > yum list | grep "radius" > freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 installed > freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base > > According to freeradius.org, this was released 8/17/04 and 1.1.0 was > released 1/12/06 > > Why is the distributed version so far behind? >I looked into versions of FreeRadius a few months ago (ie, before version 1.1 came out) and I found that although the recommended version at the time was 1.0.4 most distributions offered earlier versions and 1.0.1 was not uncommon. If I remember correctly, it was only the ultra-up-to-date distributions like Gentoo that had the latest version. I guess that the move from 1.0 to 1.1 is considered a major update that will come with CentOS 5.