similar to: FreeRadius version

It is an issue that I myself would also like to solve. I found multiple threads in samba and freeradius mailing lists. It seems that every couple of months there is question like this either here on FR mailing list and all point down to the same issue, that is: freeradius uses ntlm_auth (even when using winbind with newer freeradius versions, it also in the end uses ntlm_auth). And since

Bonjour, It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work. When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet arrives on the server. Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ? Thanks PS: no error with the compilation of the last source version of freeradius (3.0.7) --

Ok, I finally could try it out, and it seems to actually work, but You need samba 4.7 on all machines, not only AD, but also server with freeradius. I didn't get a chance to test it locally, that is samba AD + freeradius on the same server. Setup: 4.7.6 AD server and 4.6.2 samba member + freeradius didn't work (got simple "nt_status_wrong_password") but: 4.7.6 AD and 4.7.1

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,

Greetings list, I'm haveing problem with FreeRADIUS v1.0.1-3 which came with CentOS 4.1 FreeRADIUS refuses to use system accounts for authentication. The latest freeradius-1.0.4 is working correctly. Can we have this update or have to wail till RH release new rpm src? Thanks, -j

Hi All, The freeradius version in CentOS 5 is ancient, so I've been considering rebuilding the Fedora 10 rpm for freeradius-2.1.3 on CentOS. That means I'll have to maintain the package, and I'm not an uber packager. Normally I wouldn't care, but in this case I do because the freeradius server is going to be critical. So, should I rebuild the F10 rpm, or should I just stick with

Currently (samba 4 NT-like domains) i use extensively NTLM auth in freeradius and more mildly in squid, respectively with: Freeradius (mschap module): ntlm_auth = "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --request-nt-key --domain=SANVITO --username=%{mschap:User-Name:-None} --challenge=%{mschap:Challenge:-00} --nt-response=%{mschap:NT-Response:-00}" squid3: auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth

Hello Alexander, thanks Alexander for these configuration snippets. Which version of Samba are you using? Is this on debian bullseye? Is the FreeRADIUS server installed on a DC or on a Domain Member? (I just tested the latter). is "ntlm auth = yes" OK for the DCs and the domain member or does it have to be "mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only" for all servers (DCs + Member)? It

Hi all, I want to make initial VoIP authentication process from asterisk server to be based on EAP-SIM authentication of Freeradius server (so it will be not necessary to insert account datas in the asterisk database). Is there any way of doing that from Freeradius and Asterisk? Or at least, is there any way to sync the EAP-SIM data on Freeradius to asterisk server? thank you -------------- next

Hi; Samba team say "It is recommended that administrators set these additional options, if compatible with their network environment:" ntlm auth = no I use samba with FreeRadius. I configure "ntlm_ auth = no" but freeradius users not connected to wifi. I use ntlm_auth in FreeRadius side.. best regards

Hi Matthias, we?re using Debian Bullseye with the backports repo. So version is a mixture of - Samba version 4.17.3-Debian - Samba version 4.17.7-Debian We?ve installed it directly on the DC?s as well. In my opinion using "ntlm auth = yes? should be fine. Did you try using a simple RADIUS secret? In my experience long secrets or ones containing special characters don?t work very well. I

OS is Centos 7; FreeRADIUS Version 3.0.13; Samba version 4.9.1; I'm building a FreeRADIUS box for Eduroam authentication for both SP & IDP, and have hit a stumbling block I can?t figure or Google my way out of. The issue is the local AD domain is along the lines of ?example.campus?, but users have a UPN of ?user at example.com? which was added for Skype for Business as prior the UPN

Also I just facepalmed, as I double checked smb.conf right after sending mail, and in samba 4.7 there are new options available for "ntlm auth", as stated in docs: |mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only| - Only allow NTLMv1 when the client promises that it is providing MSCHAPv2 authentication (such as the |ntlm_auth| tool). So that is is I suppose that special "flag" that is used by

I've seen that is possible to use switch port blocking with freeradius and cisco switches via 802.1X and EAP protocol. Here is more info: http://wiki.freeradius.org/FreeRADIUS_Active_Directory_Integration_HOWTO What if I don't have switch that supports 802.1X or I want that blocking is done by FreeBSD, not the switch. Because FreeBSD is the firewall or gateway to some networks. Is there

Hi Rowland, Apologies for the tardy reply, I mistakenly set the mailing list to digest... Thanks for the suggestion, I'll ask the AD guys about this but I have a feeling it is an unlikely solution as Office 365 & Skype for Business apparently relies on the UPN. Unfortunately the local domain is a result of following Microsoft's "Best Practice" in the early 2000's which

Hi, we have updated our samba AD domain from 4.4.x to 4.5.x. The release notes for 4.5.0 included  "NTLMv1 authentication disabled by default". So we had to enable it to get our radius (freeradius) server working (for 802.1x). What would be the best way to change the freeradius configuration in such a way, that we can disable NTLMv1 again. The radius server is used for WLAN

Hi, My goal is to make use of samba 4 and freeradius to authenticate user to use wifi network (WPA2 enterprise). The setup is to setup Samba 4.0.3 in machine A and setup freeradius in machine B. By reading: Document A: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/beyond Document B: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Virtual_Private_Network Document C:

Hello Tim, Hello samba-people, is there an uptodate guide for authenticating via freeradius somewhere? I have some Ubiquiti APs plus a Cloud Key and I want to authenticate WLAN clients via WPA2-Enterprise instead of a (shared) PSK. It seems like https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory is missing some steps (basic setup of freeradius). Can you

Hello, I've done some further testing, and I have to correct myself. I was (kind of obviously as I think about it) wrong about samba on the freeradius server requiring v. 4.7. What makes all the difference is the method used by mschap. Traditionally in freeradius in mods-available/mschap you'll use something like: ntlm_auth = "/path/to/ntlm_auth --request-nt-key

Hi Alexander, I'm terribly sorry. We didnt have the "ntlm auth" parameter configured on the DCs at all. I added it and it just works. Thanks for your help. Now I just need to figure out how I can make WLAN-specific LDAP-Group authentication. e. g. production WLAN needs LDAP group "wlan_production" and management WLAN needs the "wlan_management" group. I