On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:45 +1000, Gavin Unsworth wrote:> This might save somebody some problems: > Centos4 > > Python-ldap-2.0.1-2.i386.rpm *requires* compat-openldap-2.1.30-2.i386.rpm > > It''s not a dependency but it should be.Then it probably ought to be filed in CentOS-4 Bugzilla https://bugzilla.caosity.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=CentOS-4 Sounds like it might be an upstream bug, but don''t see anything in Red Hat bugzilla. Also, you should not start a new message with a reply to an existing one - the reply-to information is saved in the mail headers. This is known as "hijacking a foreign thread", and hides your message by making it appear down inside the thread you replied to in threaded mail readers, and threaded web views of the mail archives. Phil
> > It''s not a dependency but it should be. > > Then it probably ought to be filed in CentOS-4 Bugzilla > https://bugzilla.caosity.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=CentOS-4 > > Sounds like it might be an upstream bug, but don''t see anything in Red > Hat bugzilla. > > Also, you should not start a new message with a reply to an existing one > - the reply-to information is saved in the mail headers. This is known > as "hijacking a foreign thread", and hides your message by making it > appear down inside the thread you replied to in threaded mail readers, > and threaded web views of the mail archives.Thanks for reminding me why I rarely bother posting to lists. I actually debated for a day or two as to wether I''d post this information. Silly me. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 27/03/2005
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:37 +1000, Gavin Unsworth wrote:> Thanks for reminding me why I rarely bother posting to lists. I actually > debated for a day or two as to wether I''d post this information. Silly me.With skin that thin, I can see why you might want to avoid posting to lists. Sorry to have caused offense. Regards, Phil
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:24:39 -0500, Phil Schaffner <P.R.Schaffner@ieee.org> wrote:> Then it probably ought to be filed in CentOS-4 Bugzilla > https://bugzilla.caosity.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=CentOS-4 > > Sounds like it might be an upstream bug, but don''t see anything in Red > Hat bugzilla. >=> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/i386/SRPMS/python-ldap-2.0.1-2.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ cat python-ldap.spec [...] Name: python-ldap Version: 2.0.1 Release: 2 Epoch: 0 Summary: An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers. [...] # the openldap from RHL <= 9 is know to be broken with python-ldap BuildRequires: openldap-devel >= %{openldap_version}, openssl-devel BuildRequires: python >= 0:2.2, python-devel >= 0:2.2 Requires: openldap >= %{openldap_version} Requires: python >= 0:%{pyver}, python < 0:%{pynext} Requires: %{_libdir}/python%{pyver}/site-packages [...] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Looks like it is a bug that should be reported upstream, no ? Gilles.