search for: buildrequir

...o i remount my filesystems with acl: # mount |grep acl /dev/mapper/vg_testsystem-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw,acl) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw,acl) but no luck i read somewhere that this happens if samba is compiled while missing acl librarys. so i looked into sernet-samba-4.1.spec # fgrep -i BuildRequires sernet-samba-4.1.spec BuildRequires: tar gzip bzip2 BuildRequires: perl BuildRequires: python-devel >= 2.5, python-devel < 3.0 BuildRequires: make gcc util-linux lsof file findutils gawk BuildRequires: cups-devel readline-devel openssl-devel ncurses-devel cyrus-sasl-devel pam-devel e2fs...

...-devel packages > installed. And if you are going to modify a build you need to install > the src.rpm into a build area first. > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetupRpmBuildEnvironment > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mock?rd=Subprojects/Mock > > The spec file contains a set BuildRequires statements that will be a > starting point. The clutter.spec file contains these: > > BuildRequires: glib2-devel mesa-libGL-devel pkgconfig pango-devel > BuildRequires: cairo-gobject-devel gdk-pixbuf2-devel atk-devel > BuildRequires: cogl-devel >= %{cogl_version} > BuildRequ...

...th}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + +# Unfortunately, despite really being noarch, we have to make virt-v2v arch +# dependent to avoid build failures on architectures where libguestfs isn't +# available. +ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 + +# Build system direct requirements +BuildRequires: gettext +BuildRequires: perl +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Manifest) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Find) + +# Runtime perl modules also required...

Hi Thomas, Thanks for the hint. I'm trying to rebuild the original SRPM without the patch for know, but I'm getting the following error. rpmbuild --rebuild /tmp/clutter-1.14.4-12.el7.src.rpm ... checking for XIAllowTouchEvents... yes checking for XIScrollClassInfo.number... yes checking for XkbQueryExtension... yes checking for GDK_PIXBUF... no configure: error: Package requirements

...rc.rpm package you will need some *-devel packages installed. And if you are going to modify a build you need to install the src.rpm into a build area first. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetupRpmBuildEnvironment https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mock?rd=Subprojects/Mock The spec file contains a set BuildRequires statements that will be a starting point. The clutter.spec file contains these: BuildRequires: glib2-devel mesa-libGL-devel pkgconfig pango-devel BuildRequires: cairo-gobject-devel gdk-pixbuf2-devel atk-devel BuildRequires: cogl-devel >= %{cogl_version} BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-de...

...similarities (we must have have forked Fedora's spec file at some point in the past - Mine was also mostly inspired by TranquilIT's SPEC file). The main difference is that the Nico rpms don't use the RHEL system libraries (gnutls, nettle..) e.g: Our SPEC file: %if 0%{?rhel} == 7 BuildRequires: gnutls-devel >= 3.3.26 %else BuildRequires: gnutls-devel >= 3.4.7 %endif Nico's file: %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 8 BuildRequires: compat-gnutls34-devel >= 3.4.7 BuildRequires: compat-nettle32-devel %else BuildRequires: gnutls-devel >= 3.4.7 %endif #...

...efine 'kversion 3.10.0-862.el7' testkmod.spec Instead, people should use something like rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --define 'kernel_version 3.10.0-862.el7' testkmod.spec In my case # rpmspec --define "kernel_version 3.10.0-957.el7" -P ~/testkmod.spec | grep "BuildRequire" warning: Macro %kmp_release defined but not used within scope warning: Macro %kmp_version defined but not used within scope warning: Macro %latest_kernel defined but not used within scope BuildRequires: kernel-devel BuildRequires: kernel-devel-x86_64 = 3.10.0-957.el7 So I want to get this m...

...b/libguestfs.spec @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Name: libguestfs Epoch: 1 -Version: 1.15.18 +Version: 1.15.19 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: Development/Libraries @@ -202,6 +208,9 @@ BuildRequires: java-devel BuildRequires: php-devel BuildRequires: erlang-erts BuildRequires: erlang-erl_interface +BuildRequires: glib2-devel +BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel +BuildRequires: gjs # For libguestfs-tools: BuildRequires: perl-Sys-Virt @@ -272,6 +281,9 @@ To mount guest filesystem...

...PERMIN" = "xno" > and gives an error. That error would be broken/ineffective after this > change. Also it does a version check on $SUPERMIN to make sure it's > not the ancient febootstrap 2.x which doesn't work. But this requires that febootstrap or supermin is in BuildRequires:, while this change removes the hard dependency of BuildRequires:. But I see, if the appliance is enabled then it would now fail with this change. In my packaging the appliance is not enabled because zypp support in supermin is not yet complete, so I did not spot this part. So just drop this pa...

I can't install rugarch package because installation of nloptr package fails . I use opensuse 12.3 # uname -a Linux candide 3.7.10-1.11-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu May 16 20:27:27 UTC 2013 (adf31bb) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux my gcc version is 4.8.1 I compiled and installed R 3.01 . then I tried to install rugarch package but it fails because it can't install depended package nloptr.

hi, I'm just recoginze that dovecot contains an rpm spec file. unfortunately it's not too useful since an rpm -ta dovecot-.x.y.tar.gz can't be used since just the dovecot.spec.in is in the tarbar and not the actual spec file (which is in this from not useful in the above form). anyway here is my patch to the spec.in. -- Levente "Si vis pacem

...ased on the LTB OpenLDAP RPM packages (OpenLDAP v2.4.x), esp. because I see that ATRPMs Dovecot RPM packages are built using OpenLDAP v2.3 devel code (i.e. standard CentOS OpenLDAP devel packages). In http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot.spec I see: ------------------------------------------------ BuildRequires: openldap-devel, cyrus-sasl-devel ... Obsoletes: %{name}-pgsql < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-mysql < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-sqlite < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-ldap < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, $ Conflicts: %{name}-pgsql > %{epoch...

I am trying to build an rpm package for iaxmodem-1.2.0. At the moment I am still trying to get a working spec file put together. I have managed to get an SRPM produced but the binary build from this fails due to there being no install task in the Makefile.in provided with the source. I have found a spec file from opensuse that provides this in the install portion: %build [

...ovirt-node.spec.in | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/ovirt-node.spec.in b/ovirt-node.spec.in index 746cf3d..2fdf4f5 100644 --- a/ovirt-node.spec.in +++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig BuildRequires: libvirt-devel >= 0.5.1 BuildRequires: dbus-devel hal-devel -Requires: libvirt >= 0.5.1 +Requires: libvirt >= 0.6.3 Requires: augeas >= 0.3.5 Requires: libvirt-qpid >= 0.2.14-3 Requires: hal @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Requires: cyrus-sasl-gssapi cyr...

Does DHT Translator all files under the same directory will be store on the same node? It sounds terrible. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090203/ebbdc7a5/attachment.html>

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. >> >> With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL >> doesn't matter anymore. >> > <snip> > Thanks, but unless I need to generate some...

...-2.3.11.3/src/lib-fts' ... ... -c -o fts-filter-normalizer-icu.lo fts-filter-normalizer-icu.c ... but at 1st glance, i don't see any explicit inclusion of the icu libs/headers checking the spec, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot/blob/master/f/dovecot.spec there's no: BuildRequires: libicu-devel either. Dunno yet if it's pulled in otherwise ... but I'm suspicious. i've cc'd in the pkg maintainer; see if they've got a comment

...Install_tomcat Version: 1.0 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Tomcat installer Group: Application License: BSOFT Source0: Install_tomcat-1.0.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) #BuildRequires: #Requires: %description This RPM is used to install the tomcat application %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %prep %setup -q %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/local cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/local tar -xf %{_topdir}/SOURCES/Install_tomcat-1.0.tar.gz --strip...

....apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2 and extracted them into rpmbuild/SOURCES/httpd-2.4.7/srclib intending to use the --with-included-arp configuration directive per rpmbuild/SOURCES/httpd-2.4.7/INSTALL. I also revised the spec file to remove requirements for the removed dependencies. #BuildRequires: apr-devel >= 1.4.0, apr-util-devel >= 1.4.0 # Replaced by --with-included-apr . . . #Requires: apr-devel, apr-util-devel # Replaced by --with-included-apr and this little 'gotcha' # forcibly prevent use of bundled apr, apr-util, pcre # rm -rf srclib/{apr,apr-util,pcre} removed t...

...od.spec > > Instead, people should use something like > > rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --define 'kernel_version > 3.10.0-862.el7' testkmod.spec > > In my case > > # rpmspec --define "kernel_version 3.10.0-957.el7" -P ~/testkmod.spec > | grep "BuildRequire" > warning: Macro %kmp_release defined but not used within scope > warning: Macro %kmp_version defined but not used within scope > warning: Macro %latest_kernel defined but not used within scope > BuildRequires: kernel-devel > BuildRequires: kernel-devel-x86_64 = 3.10.0-957.el7...