-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200
From: sophana <sophana78 at yahoo.fr>
To: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>
References: <412B3E8B.7020805 at yahoo.fr>
<Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016 at horsea.3ti.be>
Dag Wieers wrote:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
>
> CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1
> CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2
>
>Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering
>instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will
>probably be a CentOS 3.2 release.
Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought
that RHEL 3.1 existed also.
I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2
If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name?
>>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any
problem?
>
>No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is
>all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages)
>
evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find
one already patched or I should do it myself?
If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I
don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try)
Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm?
Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20040901/b75fcb5d/attachment-0003.html>
