with an
active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch
vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer.
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
.
From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen
<doug at impalanetworks.com> wrote:
1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?
Thanks,
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks Inc
CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+
Linux+, Network+, Server+
.
www.impalanetworks.com
P: (505) 327-7300
F: (505) 327-7545
Callweaver? =A0 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver.=A0 I believe they
forked somewhere in the 1.2 release.=A0 Many features ahead of Asterisk.
Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about
deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned
asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch.=A0 That and the hybrid
dual license in Asterisk.
http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Aste
risk.pdf
Read the whole piece.=A0 I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed
and
I believe is still helping Asterisk
Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.
I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro=20
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
