n active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch
vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer.
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
.
From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <doug at
impalanetworks.com> wrote:
1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?
Thanks,
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks Inc
CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+
Linux+, Network+, Server+
.
www.impalanetworks.com
P: (505) 327-7300
F: (505) 327-7545
Callweaver? =A0 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver.=A0 I believe they
forked somewhere in the 1.2 release.=A0 Many features ahead of Asterisk.
Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about
deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned
asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch.=A0 That and the hybrid dual
license in Asterisk.
http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf
Read the whole piece.=A0 I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed
and I believe is still helping Asterisk
Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.
I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro=20
