Thanks Zeeshan, SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe drivers, they told me to reinstall asterisk again But, i still having doubts about the problem :( Thanks in advance> > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:21:06 -0400 > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > HELP! > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: > <5ad99e891003172121s52a3b386k5210ce03e71963cd at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Your configs seem good. It is hard to guess why you are having this > problem. > You'll need to get help from Sangoma as it is their hardware and they'll be > able to check if it is a driver related issue. > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100318/231f3ae9/attachment.htm
Zeeshan Zakaria
2010-Mar-18 15:20 UTC
[asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE
Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel number>' shows that the channel is 'on hook' after its hang up? On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Zeeshan, SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe drivers, they told me to reinstall asterisk again But, i still having doubts about the problem :( Thanks in advance> > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:21:06 -0400 > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > HELP! > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: > <5ad99e891003172121s52a3b386k5210ce03e71963cd at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Your configs seem good. It is hard to guess why you are having this > problem. > You'll need to get help from Sangoma as it is their hardware and they'll be > able to check if it is a driver related issue. > >-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100318/2b89c873/attachment.htm
Zeeshan Zakaria
2010-Mar-18 15:27 UTC
[asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE
Was there any hardware upgrade in December after which you recompiled libpri? On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Zeeshan, SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe drivers, they told me to reinstall asterisk again But, i still having doubts about the problem :( Thanks in advance> > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:21:06 -0400 > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > HELP! > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: > <5ad99e891003172121s52a3b386k5210ce03e71963cd at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Your configs seem good. It is hard to guess why you are having this > problem. > You'll need to get help from Sangoma as it is their hardware and they'll be > able to check if it is a driver related issue. > >-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100318/e23f48a3/attachment.htm
I'm not having problems with hanging up the calls, my problems is that i asterisk dies, i'm using a pri and always zap show channel X will always show Hookstate (FXS only): "Onhook" beacuse it only applies to FXS and i'm using digital e1 trunk Or am i wrong?> Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:20:38 -0400 > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: > <5ad99e891003180820l56882922gd84102d158918d99 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel number>' > shows that the channel is 'on hook' after its hang up? > > On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Zeeshan, > > SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe drivers, > they told me to reinstall asterisk again > > But, i still having doubts about the problem :( > > Thanks in advance > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100318/d30b7d0e/attachment.htm
Zeeshan Zakaria
2010-Mar-18 18:11 UTC
[asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE
E1 channels are also zap channels. Zap show channels doesn't differentiate between them. On 2010-03-18 2:05 PM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: I'm not having problems with hanging up the calls, my problems is that i asterisk dies, i'm using a pri and always zap show channel X will always show Hookstate (FXS only): "Onhook" beacuse it only applies to FXS and i'm using digital e1 trunk Or am i wrong?> Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:20:38 -0400 > > > > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no ... > > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.... > <5ad99e891003180820l56882922gd84102d158918d99 at mail.gmail.com> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel > number>' > > shows that the chann... > > > On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Zeeshan, > > > > SAng... >-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100318/5045a41f/attachment.htm
Hello Zeeshan/Asterisk-users We are having a little problem in our Asterisk pbx using our A102DE, just like Zeeshan told us about problems with zap, even if a zap channel is in use the Hookstat is always onhook, never changes to offhook If the line is in use or not, the behavior of the Hookstate is always onhook, is this a problem? what should we do? MyPbx*CLI> zap show channel 31 Channel: 31I> File Descriptor: 44 Span: 1 Extension: I> Dialing: no Context: mde-g0 Caller ID: 2432690033 Calling TON: 33 Caller ID name: Destroy: 0LI> InAlarm: 0 Signalling Type: ISDN PRI Radio: 0*CLI> Owner: <None> Real: <None> Callwait: <None> Threeway: <None> Confno: -1 Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: no Relax DTMF: yes Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: alaw Fax Handled: no Pulse phone: no Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently ON PRI Flags: I> PRI Logical Span: Implicit Hookstate (FXS only): Onhook Thanks in advance!> > Message: 1 > > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:20:38 -0400 > > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > > Message-ID: > > <5ad99e891003180820l56882922gd84102d158918d99 at mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel > number>' > > shows that the channel is 'on hook' after its hang up? > > > > On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Zeeshan, > > > > SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe > drivers, > > they told me to reinstall asterisk again > > > > But, i still having doubts about the problem :( > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100413/152c155e/attachment.htm
Zeeshan Zakaria
2010-Apr-13 21:25 UTC
[asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE
Hi Danny, Actually the issue I faced was the opposite, i.e. the channels would stay offhook even after the hangup. Now I can't remember all the details but that setup had a lot of problems, primarily because it was a very customized system, and the Rhino T1 card was not able to correctly work with E1 when it was used with AMI signalling. Zeeshan A Zakaria -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. On 2010-04-13 3:03 PM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: Hello Zeeshan/Asterisk-users We are having a little problem in our Asterisk pbx using our A102DE, just like Zeeshan told us about problems with zap, even if a zap channel is in use the Hookstat is always onhook, never changes to offhook If the line is in use or not, the behavior of the Hookstate is always onhook, is this a problem? what should we do? MyPbx*CLI> zap show channel 31 Channel: 31I> File Descriptor: 44 Span: 1 Extension: I> Dialing: no Context: mde-g0 Caller ID: 2432690033 Calling TON: 33 Caller ID name: Destroy: 0LI> InAlarm: 0 Signalling Type: ISDN PRI Radio: 0*CLI> Owner: <None> Real: <None> Callwait: <None> Threeway: <None> Confno: -1 Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: no Relax DTMF: yes Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: alaw Fax Handled: no Pulse phone: no Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently ON PRI Flags: I> PRI Logical Span: Implicit Hookstate (FXS only): Onhook Thanks in advance!> > Message: 1 > > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:20:38 -0400 > > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > > Message-ID: > > <5ad99e891003180820l56882922gd84102d158918d99 at mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel > number>' > > shows that the channel is 'on hook' after its hang up? > > > > On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Zeeshan, > > > > SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe > drivers, > > they told me to reinstall asterisk again > > > > But, i still having doubts about the problem :( > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > >-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100413/8edf7f42/attachment.htm