asterisk users - Apr 2006 - Compatible Asterisk Connectivity Cards : Sangoma

Hello List!

I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
reason they still have to post it.

1. Sangoma A101 single port E1/T1/PRI Card
2. Sangoma A102 dual port E1/T1/PRI Card
3. Sangoma A104 quad port E1/T1/PRI Card
4. Sangoma A104D quad port E1/T1/PRI Card
5. Sangoma A200 FXS/FXO Series

Above products will work with any commercially
available motherboard in the market.  This we have
proven true because we have at least 5 different
servers that we have installed them to.  And take note
of their on-board echo cancellers, simply works
superb!

I hope the above helps especially to those who're just
starting with Asterisks.

Can anyone from Asterisk.Org please have the above
posted?

Thanks.

Heidi 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

In article <20060403034132.26792.qmail@web37610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
heidim06@yahoo.com says...
> Above products will work with any commercially
> available motherboard in the market.  This we have
> proven true because we have at least 5 different
> servers that we have installed them to.  And take note
> of their on-board echo cancellers, simply works
> superb!
I have one question. How much money has Sangoma give to Asterisk for code
developing? I'm interested in this because buying card, I would like to be
sure I'm helping developing Asterisk.

Company I work for will buy card which I choose. I don't care does it cost a
little bit more if it's that what it takes to make * better and my job a
little more easier.

P.S.
Just trying to help


--
Tomislav Parcina
tparcina#lama.hr

G'day Heidi,

You have to remember that Digium is a direct competitor to Sangoma and
they will take as much time as they can to post praise of their
competitor's hardware.  This is where OpenPBX is gaining hweadway - a
truly open source PBX.

Oh, and I run Asterisk here, not OpenPBX (at this point in time, but I'm
keeping a close eye on OpenPBX development.)

--

Regards,

Hilton Travis                          Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia)                  Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT                      http://www.quarkit.com.au
         Quark AudioVisual             http://www.quarkav.net

http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders 
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks

War doesn't determine who is right.  War determines who is left.

This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient 
  only.  It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright 
     material which must not be disclosed or distributed.

                    Quark Group Pty. Ltd.
      T/A Quark Automation, Quark AudioVisual, Quark IT 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com 
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
> Heidi Mendoza
> Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 13:42
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk Connectivity 
> Cards : Sangoma
> 
> Hello List!
> 
> I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
> connectivity products that my company installed in our
> Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
> the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
> reason they still have to post it.
> 
> 1. Sangoma A101 single port E1/T1/PRI Card
> 2. Sangoma A102 dual port E1/T1/PRI Card
> 3. Sangoma A104 quad port E1/T1/PRI Card
> 4. Sangoma A104D quad port E1/T1/PRI Card
> 5. Sangoma A200 FXS/FXO Series
> 
> Above products will work with any commercially
> available motherboard in the market.  This we have
> proven true because we have at least 5 different
> servers that we have installed them to.  And take note
> of their on-board echo cancellers, simply works
> superb!
> 
> I hope the above helps especially to those who're just
> starting with Asterisks.
> 
> Can anyone from Asterisk.Org please have the above
> posted?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Heidi 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

On 4/2/06, Heidi Mendoza <heidim06@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> Hello List!
>
> I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
> connectivity products that my company installed in our
> Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
> the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
> reason they still have to post it.


This feels "trollish" to me. Please don't feed them.

-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060403/98d7fdf9/attachment.htm

In article <44311017.3030007@routers.com>, radamson@routers.com
says...
> Its also very important to recognize that some of us have problems with 
> some of the digium products where the equivalent sangoma product 
> resolves that problem. If it were not for the sangoma products, asterisk 
> would not be installed in production at some sites.
> 
> I fully understand your statements and happen to agree with the majority 
> of them, but there is also the reality that not all cards are created 
> equal. (Some of that should be changing shortly.)
I'm not a code writer and probably I'll newer will be. I'm earning
money implementing Asterisk. Hopefully I'll earn even more money in coming
years. So, since I can't help coding, I'll help the way I can. Buying
products from company that is sponsoring Asterisk. The more money they give to
Asterisk, it's bigger possibility that I'll buy their product.

Simply as that. And that is why I asked have they supported Asterisk.


--
Tomislav Parcina
tparcina#lama.hr

I've never had issue with the Digium cards in testing and as we're
looking forward to production systems what compelling reason do I have
to pick Sangoma?  (I'm not looking for a flame-fest here, but actual
compelling reasons, ie Sangoma cards support foo which is needed in
situation bar and Digium doesn't support foo/isn't planning to support
foo until their next line of cards comes out).
Andrew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: peter@whole-uk.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
> Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk Connectivity Cards :
> Sangoma
> 
> > >         I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
> > >         connectivity products that my company installed in our
> > >         Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
> > >         the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
> > >         reason they still have to post it.
> > >
> > >
> > > This feels "trollish" to me. Please don't feed
them.
> > >
> > > -Brian
> >
> > What intrigued me is the extrapolation from 'we tested on at least
5
> > servers' to 'works with any commercially available
motherboard'!
> >
> >
> > Pete
> 
> Actually as a point of fact that is a Sangoma guarantee, they
> guarantee that their cards will work with any PCI-compliant
> motherboard.
> 
> MATT---
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

On Monday, April 03, 2006 5:51 PM Andrew Kirch wrote:
> I've never had issue with the Digium cards in testing and as we're
> looking forward to production systems what compelling reason do I
> have to pick Sangoma?  (I'm not looking for a flame-fest here, but

Never used either card myself but Sangoma is supposed to have the by far
better echo can hardware. 128tap per channel and not per card/span/whatever.
Look in the archives. Many people claim they had echo problems they were not
able to solve with Digium hardware that simply went away the moment they
used Sangoma. 


Kind regards,
  JP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3104 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060403/2e4ae12b/smime.bin

Andrew wrote:
> Digium's not in the business of selling connectivity.  :-)  But yes, I
> cannot say enough good things about the S518.  I love these things.
> Having the outgoing packet queue in the kernel and under direct
control
> also lets you get much closer to your rated upstream bandwidth and
still
> keep good call quality.  
> I love the S518s and recommend them anywhere I can.  I would KILL for
a 
> miniPCI version, even if I had to have the Part68 interface off-card.
One idea I suggested to Sangoma, and it sounds like there are at least
a few people here that might back the concept.  I also love my S518, and
would love it more if it was available as an option on the FXO module
for the A200.

Then I wouldn't have to choose between internet connectivity or POTS
connectivity on SFF systems that I like to use for PBX/firewall devices
in a SoHo.

Dan

On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:02, Dan Austin wrote:
> One idea I suggested to Sangoma, and it sounds like there are at least
> a few people here that might back the concept.  I also love my S518, and
> would love it more if it was available as an option on the FXO module
> for the A200.
Yes, an S518 with a Linux-compatible and FXO-capable modem in it would rock.  
Not only would you have DSL, but you would have your emergency phone line AND 
a dialin modem and/or FaxModem.

Hell you can get complete 2400-baud and 14k4-baud modems in a pair of ICs 
these days...  might be worth slapping on as a module...

-A.