canuck15
2005-Aug-31 10:42 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for production * environment
I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this. It seem that * works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have some enticing benefits. Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it is not as well tested as 2.4 (yet!). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050831/9bd4f1e0/attachment.htm
Dave Cotton
2005-Aug-31 10:52 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for production * environment
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:42 -0700, canuck15 wrote:> I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this. It seem that * > works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here > and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on > either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest > possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have > some enticing benefits. > > Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone > looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it > is not as well tested as 2.4 (yet!).Following that argument to it's logical conclusion I'd stick to 2.0.xx or one of the 2.2 series. -- Dave Cotton <dcotton@linuxautrement.com>
Anthony Rodgers
2005-Aug-31 12:37 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for production *environment
Linux asterisk.dnv.org 2.6.9-11.EL #1 Fri May 20 18:17:57 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Rock solid so far, albeit in a pilot environment..... Regards, -- Anthony Rodgers Business Systems Analyst District of North Vancouver Web: http://www.dnv.org RSS Feed: http://www.dnv.org/rss.asp On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:42 AM, canuck15 wrote:> I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this.? It seem that * > works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4.? Maybe a few small issues here > and there but generally it?seems to me that * is just as stable on > either platform.? 2.4 is?the obvious choice for?the highest > possiblility of a?stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have > some enticing benefits.?? > ? > Can?Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for?someone > looking for a well tested stable production environment even though?it > is not as well tested as 2.4 > (yet!).?_______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Tzafrir Cohen
2005-Aug-31 13:18 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for production * environment
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:42:48AM -0700, canuck15 wrote:> I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this. It seem that * works > just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4.Not exactly. One of the changes between 2.4 and 2.6 is work on reducing latency: Mainly by preemption. Asterisk needs that quicker response. -- Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir@jbr.cohens.org.il | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's tzafrir@cohens.org.il | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend
Hi, Im about to start shopping parts for an * box. We are migrating from a Meridian Norstar+ Modular ICS Here are the customer details: a) Meridian with 8 analog lines card and 32 nortel digital phones and voicemail. We will interface * to the meridian using the analog ports so we dont loose the phones. b)half E1. The * box will get half E1 (with DID) for connecting to the local telco. We need two recepcionist/operator phones (sip or whatever) So in terms of equipment I will need: Sangoma a101 E1/PCI an 8 port analog card a channel bank? Can someone tell me if i really have to buy an analog card? or maybe link me to a web site that explains (with images) how a t1/e1 is managed? Thanks, and I apologize for this completely newbie question. I've never seen images or instructions on how to handle this. Im not even sure im using the right terms in Google. -- ------------------------------------------- Erick Perez Linux User 376588 http://counter.li.org/ (Get counted!!!) Panama, Republic of Panama