search for: entic

I'm having problems getting Asterisk SIP to register with an Entice softswitch SIP Gateway. My provider tells me that all thats needed is a user name, password and the IP address and to register and it needs to be using MD5 authentication. I continualy get a "603 Decline" message. The provider of the gateway says they are not receiving any authenticatio...

...but I think it would make a good GSOC project because of it's somewhat narrow scope. I think for a lot of people 3D eye candy isn't a feature they're desperate for, they just care about a functional and efficient 2D driver, and having video acceleration would complement that nicely and entice them to switch from the Nvidia binary driver and the old nv driver long before the people who want the 3D features. I've read through jb17bsome's notes on XvMC and I think all the work he's done so far is a great head's up on what's involved. I've also read through the VAA...

...y for that and do want to apologize to all of you affected. Indeed, on one hand, not everybody has a choice, and even then, I'm (and 100s of 1000s of others) are very grateful to those among you who develop and test R (and other free software, say, Emacs, or Rstudio) on Windows. I do want to entice people to have a long look beyond closed source OS into the world of Free Software where not only R is FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) but (all / almost) all the tools you use are of that same spirit. Best, Martin > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:24 PM Martin Maechler <maechler at s...

...bout this. It seem that * works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have some enticing benefits. Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it is not as well tested as 2.4 (yet!). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/p...

Hi everyone, I’m working with the LLVM C API now. I see that several functions are deprecated, however the only notion is in comments around the function. Is there any specific reason why __attribute__((deprecated)) is omitted? Will it make sense to send a patch with such additions? -- AlexDenisov Software Engineer, http://lowlevelbits.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

...ke a windows self-installing thing, i.e. one single file I can download, click on, it goes thru a (preferably non-interactive, I am happy to let it look at my system and decide for itself whats best) and I wind up with a functioning copy of wine? And if there isn't and one purpose of wine it to entice people away from windows, then shouldn't there be such a thing? thanks kieran

...out this. It seem that * works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have some enticing benefits. Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it is not as well tested as 2.4 (yet!). <<ATT00663.txt>>

...piler. For input to the back-end, we can generate LLVM bytecode, or we can generate C source code, and then we need it converted to a native machine code .EXE or DLL ready to load and run. So you see, either GCC or LLVM can be used as our back-end. Now what advantage does LLVM have that will entice us to pick LLVM over GCC? LLVM is smaller? Not really, because LLVM still requires the use of GCC for the .S file, as I said above. LLVM would be a considerably more attractive solution than GCC *if* the following were true: (a) LLVM could be used as a back-end without use of GCC. Meaning...

On 2 March 2015 at 09:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: | I generally recommend that people use Rcpp, which hides a lot of the | details. It will generate your .Call calls for you, and generate the | C++ code that receives them; you just need to think about the real | problem, not the interface. It has its own learning curve, but I think | it is easier than using the low-level code that you need to

...rks. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that may beat you up and take your lunch money. We make no guarantees. But the 3.1 tree will also has some new experimental features that may entice you to take a look (we hope). Samba 3.1.0 will include changes to winbindd (for scalability), code for implementing NT privileges, some proposed fixes to the printing code's background queue update daemon, and others. So invariably, the question will arise what is the relationship between Sa...

...rks. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that may beat you up and take your lunch money. We make no guarantees. But the 3.1 tree will also has some new experimental features that may entice you to take a look (we hope). Samba 3.1.0 will include changes to winbindd (for scalability), code for implementing NT privileges, some proposed fixes to the printing code's background queue update daemon, and others. So invariably, the question will arise what is the relationship between Sa...

...rom these, one *could* - possibly wrongly - conclude that > 'i * 2' is significantly faster than both 'i * 2L' and also > 'i + i' ---- which I find astonishing, given that i is integer here... > > Probably no reason for deep thoughts here, but if someone is > enticed, this maybe slightly interesting to read. > > Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich > > > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >

...nd aren't trying to hide that fact :), please email the list (or just me), and I'll compile a webpage. I think it would be nice to have a list of products where LLVM is used commercially -- currently, we only have a list of academic and open-source projects that use LLVM. If you need any enticement to email me, think of it as free advertisement. Thanks! -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net

...re interested on have this code committed so that it is available to other developers and started to be used. We are ourselves exploring the advantages of using combined path profiling in speculative Partial Redundancy Elimination (PRE) in LLVM. Adam has sent requests to the llvmdev list to try to entice a reviewer to review the code and documentation, but so far has not been successful. Would the wiser hands around have advice to us as to how to recruit someone that can review the code and possibly approve it for commitment? Cheers, Nelson / \ / /...

Hello! I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial enviroment? Regards Jonas Gustavsson

.... I don't believe it could access the passphrase which should never leave the client. I presume it could capture the public key, which could be read from the filesystem anyway. And I presume it could capture traffic to/from the virtual terminal. Is there any way for an attacker to replay authentication to a third machine, accessed via the compromised machine using ssh-agent ? If a user connects to a compromised machine using keys, but from an untainted client, do they need to change their keys or passphrase ? (I presume, in principle, that an attacker could steal private user keys and m...

...hide that fact :), please email the list (or just > me), and I'll compile a webpage. I think it would be nice to have a > list of products where LLVM is used commercially -- currently, we only > have a list of academic and open-source projects that use LLVM. > > If you need any enticement to email me, think of it as free > advertisement. > > Thanks! > > -- > Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http:...

...as a number of different pollutants, so what I'd ideally like to do is arbitrarily define two panels with different grouping variables. I've tried to set up dummy groups and to condition on those, but with no luck. I think what I need to do is possible with viewports, but is there no way to entice lattice to function in this way? Any help would be appreciated. cheers, Alex Karner Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Davis [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...level. | >From these, one *could* - possibly wrongly - conclude that | 'i * 2' is significantly faster than both 'i * 2L' and also | 'i + i' ---- which I find astonishing, given that i is integer here... | | Probably no reason for deep thoughts here, but if someone is | enticed, this maybe slightly interesting to read. | | Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich | | [DELETED ATTACHMENT mbenchm-doubling.png, PNG image] -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

...fter it gets the report descriptor, NUT then gets each of the reports defined in there, so that's good. But after that, there are no more messages (no more reports being requested...the NUT debug info just shows "libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out" repeatedly). I put in some enticing values into the report descriptor, like shutdownimminent and discharging and charging, hoping that would get NUT interested enough to ask for those status, but not so far. I'm missing something obvious. I'm going to dig into NUT to see if I can find where it decides what reports to get...