thr3ads.net - asterisk users - [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" [Mar 2005]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

James Taylor

2005-Mar-09 17:53 UTC

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines"

I configured this once now I forgot what I did.

Two Broadvoice accounts.
Incoming is simple - just use the phone numbers.

Outgoing:

Dial out on a specific line
and/or
set up the groups and select the other "line" if the first one is
busy?


-- 
James Taylor
MetroTel
3505 Summerihll Road
Suite 11
Texarkana, Texas  75503
903-793-1956

James Pooton

2005-Mar-09 18:07 UTC

head link

[Asterisk-Users] Single FXS port with multiple phones ?

Hello all..  

I have what I think is a rather simple question here.  We're using * for
home and business lines with great success so far. (inbound, outbound,
several hard phones, voicemail, IVR, etc)  

My next project is to get some of my traditional POTS phones at home on the
system.  I understand this requires an FXS interface(s), which really is my
question.  If I don't care about having individual extensions for every line
(as most "homes" don't) then I'm thinking it should be
possible to just have
a single FXS interface that would replace the telco's normal line connection
to my home wiring after the demarc (assuming it could provide the juice
required by my phones).  Stop me here if I'm wrong. :)  

In trying to research this further, I'm looking at getting an SPA-3000 to do
the FXS duties (as I could also use the FXO interface for something else),
and it gives a variety of FXS specs.  After a bunch of Googling it would
seem that REN (ringer equivalence number) is one I need to pay attention to.
The SPA-3000 says it can provide 3 REN.  So as long as I stay under that
total for my phones am I pretty much safe or are there other specs that I'm
overlooking?  Like possibly if more then one phone is off hook to talk on
the line at the same time?

In a semi-related question, I have a bunch of 2.4 Ghz cordless sets here and
the base stations say "Ring Equivalence: 0.0B".  Could this truly be
the
case?  Like the phones just monitor the line for a ring signal but don't
draw current from it when it's ringing. I can see how it's possible as
they
have their own AC, but I just wanted to confirm.

Sorry for the long post, I thought it would be shorter.

-James

David Shaw

2005-Mar-11 10:57 UTC

head link

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

I also have multiple line with Broadvoice. I would like to have each
incoming line ring a different extension and configure an internal user
to use his or her own broadvoice line..

Here is my sip.conf

register =>
XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com:password:XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com


register =>
AAAAAAAAAA@sip.broadvoice.com:password:AAAAAAAAAA@sip.broadvoice.com

[broadvoice1]
type=peer
username=XXXXXXXXXX
fromuser=XXXXXXXXXX
authuser=XXXXXXXXXX
secret=password
host=sip.broadvoice.com
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice1
dtmfmode=inband
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no

[bv-in-1]
type=friend
host=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice1
dtmfmode=inband
canreinvite=yes
nat=no
allow=ulaw

[broadvoice2]
type=peer
username=AAAAAAAAAA
fromuser=AAAAAAAAAA
authuser=AAAAAAAAAA
secret=password
host=sip.broadvoice.com
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice2
dtmfmode=inband
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no

[bv-in-2]
type=friend
host=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice2
dtmfmode=inband
canreinvite=yes
nat=no
allow=ulaw

so on so on

But all incoming calls on Broadvoice uses extensions.conf [broadvoice4]
or what evers the last line for broadvoice.


On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 18:53 -0600, James Taylor wrote:> I configured this once now I forgot what I did.
> 
> Two Broadvoice accounts.
> Incoming is simple - just use the phone numbers.
> 
> Outgoing:
> 
> Dial out on a specific line
> and/or
> set up the groups and select the other "line" if the first one is
busy?
> 
> 
> -- 
> James Taylor
> MetroTel
> 3505 Summerihll Road
> Suite 11
> Texarkana, Texas  75503
> 903-793-1956
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

Greg Hill

2005-Mar-11 11:07 UTC

head link

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, David Shaw wrote:
> I also have multiple line with Broadvoice. I would like to have each
> incoming line ring a different extension and configure an internal user
> to use his or her own broadvoice line..
For dialing out, Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@broadvoiceX) should send it through
account X.

For incoming, try setting each account to use the same context (sip.conf).
Then append /exten-no to the register strings ( /111, /112, whatever).
When a call comes in, it should start in extensions.conf in the context
you specified at the extension after the /, rather than at the default s
extension. That should make it easy enough to craft a dialplan which
routes calls based on which account/number they arrived through.

Greg

Marios Andreou

2005-Mar-11 11:14 UTC

head link

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

Use this for the register:
 register =>
XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com:password:XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com/<ext1>
 register =>
XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com:password:XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com/<ext2>

The <ext1> and <ext2> are the extension that you like to ring when a
phone call comes in.
Actually is an extension in your extensions.conf so you can have it to do
whatever you like.

To place outgoing calls for example  <ext1> use bv1 and <ext2> use
bv2 account have the ext1 and ext2 on different context.
Like in sip.conf:
[<ext1>]
context=for-ext1
... So on ...

[<ext2>]
context=for-ext2
... So on ...

In extensions.conf:

[for-ext1]
..........
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1, Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@broadvoice1,30) ; Dial Broadvoice
for 30 seconds
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,2, Congestion() ; No answer, nothing
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,102, Busy() ; Busy
...........
include => (common stuff so ext1 can call ext2 directly)

[for-ext2]
..........
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1, Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@broadvoice2,30) ; Dial Broadvoice
for 30 seconds
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,2, Congestion() ; No answer, nothing
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,102, Busy() ; Busy
include => (common stuff so ext1 can call ext2 directly)

So when the SIP phones register are in a different context and when they try to
place a call they will pick there own broadvoice
account.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David Shaw
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

I also have multiple line with Broadvoice. I would like to have each
incoming line ring a different extension and configure an internal user
to use his or her own broadvoice line..

Here is my sip.conf

register =>
XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com:password:XXXXXXXXXX@sip.broadvoice.com

register =>
AAAAAAAAAA@sip.broadvoice.com:password:AAAAAAAAAA@sip.broadvoice.com

[broadvoice1]
type=peer
username=XXXXXXXXXX
fromuser=XXXXXXXXXX
authuser=XXXXXXXXXX
secret=password
host=sip.broadvoice.com
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice1
dtmfmode=inband
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no

[bv-in-1]
type=friend
host=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice1
dtmfmode=inband
canreinvite=yes
nat=no
allow=ulaw

[broadvoice2]
type=peer
username=AAAAAAAAAA
fromuser=AAAAAAAAAA
authuser=AAAAAAAAAA
secret=password
host=sip.broadvoice.com
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice2
dtmfmode=inband
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no

[bv-in-2]
type=friend
host=sip.broadvoice.com
context=from-broadvoice2
dtmfmode=inband
canreinvite=yes
nat=no
allow=ulaw

so on so on

But all incoming calls on Broadvoice uses extensions.conf [broadvoice4]
or what evers the last line for broadvoice.

On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 18:53 -0600, James Taylor wrote:> I configured this once now I forgot what I did.
> 
> Two Broadvoice accounts.
> Incoming is simple - just use the phone numbers.
> 
> Outgoing:
> 
> Dial out on a specific line
> and/or
> set up the groups and select the other "line" if the first one is
busy?
> 
> 
> -- 
> James Taylor
> MetroTel
> 3505 Summerihll Road
> Suite 11
> Texarkana, Texas  75503
> 903-793-1956
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Maybe Matching Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

asterisk users - Mar 2005 - Broadvoice Multiple "lines"

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines"

[Asterisk-Users] Single FXS port with multiple phones ?

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Multiple "lines" {Scanned}

Maybe Matching Threads