asterisk users - Sep 2004 - Fast AGI

Dude.. Lay off..  Geesh you don't have to be such as ass on the board.  
So he made a mistake..  Grow up.  Were supposed to be here helping 
each other not knocking people down.  How about you go take a lesson on
how to play nice in a message list.  My 4 year old can do better than
you can.

 Brian


Ps If it makes you feel better..  I deleted the junk at the bottom.. 
Have a peachy day.. 


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 10:32 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fast AGI

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 06:56, david winter wrote:
> Anyone know where i can find information/ examples on how to use the 
> 'fast agi' or 'agi over tcp'. I heard mark talking about it
during
> astricon. what i understand is that it  allows the agi processing to
run 
> on a serparate machine from the * server the calls are processing on. 
> which would speed things up and take the load of the call processing
box.

Can you please go take a general email course so you learn about threads
and why you look like a complete moron when you don't start a new one.
You where so lazy you didn't even delete the old message. 

Do you know what CVS is? If you did, you might know that checking the
most recent version is a good thing. Even better is subscribing to and
reading the -cvs mailing list which shows all the updates as they get
checked in. You would then have known that Mark committed it to CVS
around Wednesday last week and has been updated a couple of times since
then.

I have been working with FastAGI. I really like it and the idea. But I
was curious why the decision was made to not follow a standard http
protocol approach? If it had been http, I could then use all the
conventional tools that already exist to maintain state, grab name
value pairs or any number of things.