Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/ Changelog --------- * Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0 - Drank beer at Astricon * Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC2 - Replaced parking.conf with features.conf * Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC1 * Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.9.0 * Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.7.2 * Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for chan_zap - Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot - First really useable release. Yay! * Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1 <wrl@express.org> - Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers (_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73) * Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - added doc macros - added config macros - updated install stanza to correct symlink issue - updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile - added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk - added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9 - asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9 * Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST
Is anyone working on a Fedora Core 2 RPM? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Greg Boehnlein Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:57 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9 Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/ Changelog --------- * Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0 - Drank beer at Astricon * Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC2 - Replaced parking.conf with features.conf * Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC1 * Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.9.0 * Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.7.2 * Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for chan_zap - Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot - First really useable release. Yay! * Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1 <wrl@express.org> - Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers (_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73) * Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - added doc macros - added config macros - updated install stanza to correct symlink issue - updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile - added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk - added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9 - asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9 * Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Apologies all around, if this is a stuoid question, but as I am not very familiar with RPMs and RPMSs, how can I install those babies on my RH9? Can someone, please, post a short, step by step, hand-holding guide? In the past I was donloading from CVS following Andy Powell's HOW-TO for dummies. TIA Yiannis. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Greg Boehnlein Sent: 23 September 2004 20:57 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9 Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/ Changelog --------- * Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0 - Drank beer at Astricon * Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC2 - Replaced parking.conf with features.conf * Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 1.0-RC1 * Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.9.0 * Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated to version 0.7.2 * Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for chan_zap - Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot - First really useable release. Yay! * Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1 <wrl@express.org> - Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers (_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73) * Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - added doc macros - added config macros - updated install stanza to correct symlink issue - updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile - added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk - added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9 - asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9 * Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net> - Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Greg, Which kernel are you using? I have two machines at home and the zaptel kernel module only runs properly on one of them... The P-3 box worked... kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpm The Athlon did not... kernel-2.4.20-31.9.athlon.rpm Both machines were updated on the same day (apt-get) and for the most part have the same packages. Has anyone made any headway on this? Thanks, Pete
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Pete Brown wrote:> Greg, > Which kernel are you using? I have two machines at home and the zaptel > kernel module only runs properly on one of them... > > The P-3 box worked... > kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpmRH73 Zaptel Modules are built against: 2.4.20_28.7.i386 RH9 Zaptel Modules are built against: 2.4.20_31.9.i386> The Athlon did not... > kernel-2.4.20-31.9.athlon.rpm > > Both machines were updated on the same day (apt-get) and for the most part > have the same packages. Has anyone made any headway on this?This is one of the issues w/ Zaptel. It has to be built for a specific kernel and architecture, so without maintaining every possible combination of kernel and OS, you are actually better off to just build the SRPM on your reference development platform. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST