Hello,
Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my
updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform.
Current Release
---------------
asterisk-1.0-0
libpri-1.0-0
zaptel-1.0-0
kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0
RedHat 7.3
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/
RedHat 9.0
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/
Changelog
---------
* Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0
- Drank beer at Astricon
* Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC2
- Replaced parking.conf with features.conf
* Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC1
* Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.9.0
* Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.7.2
* Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for
chan_zap
- Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot
- First really useable release. Yay!
* Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1
<wrl@express.org>
- Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers
(_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73)
* Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- added doc macros
- added config macros
- updated install stanza to correct symlink issue
- updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile
- added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk
- added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9
- asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9
* Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST
Is anyone working on a Fedora Core 2 RPM?
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Boehnlein
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:57 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9
Hello,
Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release
my
updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform.
Current Release
---------------
asterisk-1.0-0
libpri-1.0-0
zaptel-1.0-0
kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0
RedHat 7.3
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/
RedHat 9.0
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/
Changelog
---------
* Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0
- Drank beer at Astricon
* Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC2
- Replaced parking.conf with features.conf
* Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC1
* Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.9.0
* Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.7.2
* Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for
chan_zap
- Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot
- First really useable release. Yay!
* Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1
<wrl@express.org>
- Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers
(_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73)
* Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- added doc macros
- added config macros
- updated install stanza to correct symlink issue
- updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile
- added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk
- added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9
- asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9
* Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Apologies all around, if this is a stuoid question, but as I am not very
familiar with RPMs and RPMSs, how can I install those babies on my RH9? Can
someone, please, post a short, step by step, hand-holding guide? In the past
I was donloading from CVS following Andy Powell's HOW-TO for dummies.
TIA
Yiannis.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Greg
Boehnlein
Sent: 23 September 2004 20:57
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9
Hello,
Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my
updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform.
Current Release
---------------
asterisk-1.0-0
libpri-1.0-0
zaptel-1.0-0
kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0
RedHat 7.3
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/
RedHat 9.0
----------
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh9/SRPMS/
Changelog
---------
* Thu Sep 23 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0
- Drank beer at Astricon
* Thu Aug 12 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC2
- Replaced parking.conf with features.conf
* Sat Jul 17 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 1.0-RC1
* Thu May 27 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.9.0
* Wed Feb 04 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated to version 0.7.2
* Sat Jan 31 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated development environment to ensure proper build consistency for
chan_zap
- Added post-install chkconfig to auto-start asterisk on boot
- First really useable release. Yay!
* Mon Jan 26 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Updated changelog entry to enable build on Fedora Core 1
<wrl@express.org>
- Made the decsision to use Dist Specific version numbers
(_fc1,_rh9,_rh8,_rh73)
* Sat Jan 24 2004 Gregory Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- added doc macros
- added config macros
- updated install stanza to correct symlink issue
- updated patch0 to include changes to Makefile
- added /etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk
- added "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" for RH9
- asterisk.spec now builds cleanly on RH73 and RH9
* Wed Jan 21 2004 Gregory J. Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
- Initial .spec file created. Most likely buggered. Badly needs help.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Greg, Which kernel are you using? I have two machines at home and the zaptel kernel module only runs properly on one of them... The P-3 box worked... kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpm The Athlon did not... kernel-2.4.20-31.9.athlon.rpm Both machines were updated on the same day (apt-get) and for the most part have the same packages. Has anyone made any headway on this? Thanks, Pete
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Pete Brown wrote:> Greg, > Which kernel are you using? I have two machines at home and the zaptel > kernel module only runs properly on one of them... > > The P-3 box worked... > kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpmRH73 Zaptel Modules are built against: 2.4.20_28.7.i386 RH9 Zaptel Modules are built against: 2.4.20_31.9.i386> The Athlon did not... > kernel-2.4.20-31.9.athlon.rpm > > Both machines were updated on the same day (apt-get) and for the most part > have the same packages. Has anyone made any headway on this?This is one of the issues w/ Zaptel. It has to be built for a specific kernel and architecture, so without maintaining every possible combination of kernel and OS, you are actually better off to just build the SRPM on your reference development platform. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST