Sadly it's a limited to PRIs(at least that's what I've been told) You just can't send that much call data with a good old non-PRI T1. The up side is you get one extra voice channel to use as compared to a PRI. It's strange that the carrier doesn't have PRI cabability, I've run into many more carriers that can't do non-PRI. I've even had one that couldn't send me ANI(CallerID) on non-PRI lines. Once you get into the world of ISDN and PRI, you start to be able to do a lot more with the signaling of calls, and you even have the ability to do faster call switching as compared to a non-PRI. My advice is to get a different carrier, there are hundreds out there. And if you absolutely have to have dynamic CallerID transmission you should verify that your new carrier will let you do that before you sign a contract(Make sure you verify it by talking to an actual switch tech from the carrier, sales people will lie through their teeth to get you to sign that contract). Hope this helps, MATT--- -----Original Message----- From: Mike Machado [mailto:mike@homelandtel.com] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:30 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange T1 Problem - FIXED plus new question> > > You can usually get CLI on an E&M robbed bit T1 by configuring it right. > Instead of just sending you the DNIS as a string of DTMF they usually > send *<cli>*<dnis>*. The DNIS and CLI may be swapped, and there may be > less than 3 *s in the string - wonderful consistency, eh? :-\I am getting CallerID and DNIS on the inbound calls. What I really need is to be able to set callerID on outbound calls. I am trying to set the callerid using SetCIDNum just before using Dial on a zap channel, but it looks like the switch guys have it set to always stamp the same callerID on the my outbound calls no matter what I put in SetCIDNum or what channel on the T1 I use. Is this a misconfiguration of the switch or a limitation of the signaling protocol? If its the switch, can you give me any pointers as to what I could ask them to look for, or if its the protocol, do you know any other signaling protocol that lets me set outbound callerID (besides PRI)? _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Mike Machado
2004-Apr-16 09:05 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Strange T1 Problem - FIXED plus new question
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 08:45, mattf wrote:> Sadly it's a limited to PRIs(at least that's what I've been told) You just > can't send that much call data with a good old non-PRI T1. The up side is > you get one extra voice channel to use as compared to a PRI. It's strange > that the carrier doesn't have PRI cabability, I've run into many more > carriers that can't do non-PRI. I've even had one that couldn't send me > ANI(CallerID) on non-PRI lines. > > Once you get into the world of ISDN and PRI, you start to be able to do a > lot more with the signaling of calls, and you even have the ability to do > faster call switching as compared to a non-PRI. > > My advice is to get a different carrier, there are hundreds out there. And > if you absolutely have to have dynamic CallerID transmission you should > verify that your new carrier will let you do that before you sign a > contract(Make sure you verify it by talking to an actual switch tech from > the carrier, sales people will lie through their teeth to get you to sign > that contract). > > Hope this helps, > > MATT--- >My situation is a little different. The carrier switch is about 100 feet away from my asterisk box. The company I am working for is a CLEC and they have their own switch. The switch I am connected to does not have a very expensive PRI signaling card ($35k), so they can only do CAS. If I was a customer and getting service from a carrier, I would definitely have gotten a PRI. Thanks for your perspective on this.
George Pajari
2004-Apr-16 12:08 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Dealing with LECs (was Strange T1 Problem)
Matt advised:> And > if you absolutely have to have dynamic CallerID transmission you should > verify that your new carrier will let you do that before you sign a > contract(Make sure you verify it by talking to an actual switch tech from > the carrier, sales people will lie through their teeth to get you to sign > that contract).Good advice and here's more... Once you have the actual switch tech to confirm you can run dynamic CallerID (and specify if the CallerIDs you will be specifying are within the DIDs allocated to your PRI or not), then get it in writing. Best is if they will email you confirmation. Failing that, send them email saying "Further to our telephone conversation of xxyyzz, this is to confirm that with the PRI we will be ordering from aabbcc company we will be able to dynamically specify the CLID on outbound calls and the CLID may or may not be one of our DIDs."