JR Richardson
2003-Oct-30 18:31 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
I'm trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as possible. I'm wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages list from the Redhat installation [rpm -qa] and has parsed out all packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install guide from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed packages. I'm sure most of those packages can be eliminated. If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then there's an opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization? Thanks in advance. JR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031030/8b03a2b0/attachment.htm
why start this with redhat? I'd say it's the worse linux dist to attempt to make a small footprint. Try gentoo. If you want asterisk with knoppix, then start with that or debian (of which it's based) ----- Original Message ----- From: JR Richardson To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages I'm trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as possible. I'm wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages list from the Redhat installation [rpm -qa] and has parsed out all packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install guide from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed packages. I'm sure most of those packages can be eliminated. If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then there's an opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization? Thanks in advance. JR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031030/a163ea44/attachment.htm
JR Richardson wrote:> I?m trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as > possible. I?m wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages > list from the Redhat installation [rpm ?qa] and has parsed out all > packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install guide > from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed > packages. I?m sure most of those packages can be eliminated.>> If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then there?s > an opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. > > BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization?Wierd that I had actually started to just think about this earlier today... :) Unfortunately this is going to be nothing that I can do to help at this point.. I am really quite budgeted for time, and I can barely work on the other things I have somewhat commited to. I'll be so glad when I'm back in school, and hopefully have some more time to work on this kind of stuff. Keep me posted, I have a couple of idea's that this could be useful for (if anything, just what the minimum packages are for a RH install) Thanks! -- +------------------------------------------+ |Leif Madsen - http://www.hacklocalhost.com| +------------------------------------------+ | @| leif at hacklocalhost dot com | | SMS| sms at hacklocalhost dot com | | FWD| 18924 IAX| 1700-363-0761 | |iptel| 8972-1969 sipph| 1-747-386-1618 | +------------------------------------------+
Chris Albertson
2003-Oct-30 19:18 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
I've got an old notebook 486DX2 with 8MB RAM and a _very_ small drive. Linux runs fine on it but no-way can I even run the RedHat install program. The 486 make a good fire wall. It take little power and little space, has a builtin battery UPS and screen. And even a 486 can handle a 1Mb ADSL line. Butit can't run RedHat. A minimal Linux system will fit on a self contained floppy disk and run in about 4MB of RAM On top of this, to run Asterisk you wil need Asterisk, it's drivers, any *.so files that "ldd" finds plus any "extras". The extras can be quite large like Festival amd mp3123 and PostgreSQL and a web server and so on. I'd recommand any of the floppy disk based distributions over RedHat if you have very minimal hardware. I've used "tomsrtbt" www.toms.net/rb/ for years now. It is easy to modify too as there is a file you can edit which controls what gets put on the disk. With tomsrtbt the idea is that you build a bootable image using a large RedHat or Debiam system and then move that disk over to the target hardware. Normally this is a floppy but you can make it an LS120 or small IDE with some editing of his scripts. I use tomsrtbtas a hardware diagnostic floppy for even MS Windows based systems. It runs out of ram without a hard drive and I can look around in /proc to see what's up with the hardware and it runs on systems that can't boot Windows, or Redhat. So go to www.toms.net/rb/ and try it out. You could also boot with off the self tomsrtbt then ftp or nfs transfer Asterisk but you may fid other floppy based Linuxs you like. but Redhat just will not run on the real low end "slackware" might work too. I ued to run it back when my biggest PC was a 386 back when Linux kernal was still 0.x but have not used slackware Linux in many years. Today I used RedHat, Tomsrtbt and Solaris (BTW I'd recommend Solaris for that guy with 50,000 users who asked here earlier as it is hard to find a Intel box with more then 4 GB RAM or 4 CPUs) --- JR Richardson <jr.richardson@cox.net> wrote:> I'm trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as > possible. > I'm wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages list > from the > Redhat installation [rpm -qa] and has parsed out all packages not > needed for > * to run. I follow the custom install guide from Andy Powell but the > installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed packages. I'm sure > most of > those packages can be eliminated. > > > > If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then > there's an > opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. > > > > BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > JR > >====Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org KG6OMK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
Lars Boegild Thomsen
2003-Oct-30 22:49 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
Hi, 948MB???? I would say that's an excellent reason not to use Redhat if one need one. I would put an estimated guess that a minimal Debian + Asterisk would take about 60 MB or so (and Knoppix is losely based on Debian) using a standard installation stripped of everything unnecessary (including development libraries, compilers etc.). Another alternative is to do what I do for my "embedded asterisk" project - compile everything from scratch. Using that approach I am currently at 5.5 MB for the root filesystem, 600 kB for the kernel and around 400 kB for initrd - in other words - less than 7 MB all in all (meaning it will fit into a small flash). -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of JR Richardson Sent: 31 October 2003 09:32 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages I'm trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as possible. I'm wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages list from the Redhat installation [rpm -qa] and has parsed out all packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install guide from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed packages. I'm sure most of those packages can be eliminated. If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then there's an opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization? Thanks in advance. JR
Johnson, Randy
2003-Oct-31 07:22 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
There are good instructions for building a minimal RedHat 7.2 (http://www.muine.org/~hoang/minired.html) or 7.3 (http://www.muine.org/~hoang/minired73.html) system. I have not followed these instructions, but I have followed the same author's documentation for Postfix configuration. He claims the setup uses 261MB of disk space. Randy Johnson -----Original Message----- From: JR Richardson [mailto:jr.richardson@cox.net] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:32 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages I'm trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as possible. I'm wondering if anyone has looked at the installed packages list from the Redhat installation [rpm -qa] and has parsed out all packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install guide from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 installed packages. I'm sure most of those packages can be eliminated. If the installation can be reduced to below, say 600 Meg, then there's an opportunity to harden * into a KNOPPIX Customization. BTW, has anyone already tried to produce a KNOPPIX * Customization? Thanks in advance. JR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031031/7b39cf6f/attachment.htm
Gavin Hamill
2003-Oct-31 07:44 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
Apologies for breaking the thread - the link to my mail server is down, so am replying from the Pipermail web archives. I'm using a cut-down Debian-based distro called 'pebble' for my firewall machine using a 128MB CompactFlash card (it would just about fit on 64...) The various system files have been wiggled around a bit so that the rootfs can be mounted read-only, thus reducing wear and tear on the CF card. The distro is intended to run Wireless access points, and you'll need to weed out the svchost processes and the wireless "NoCat" stuff in inittab, but it's nice, and keeps the apt system so you can install new packages as/if needed... http://www.nycwireless.net/pebble/ Cheers, Gavin.
Brancaleoni Matteo
2003-Oct-31 07:47 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
Hi. Il ven, 2003-10-31 alle 02:31, JR Richardson ha scritto:> I?m trying to get the total Linux/* installation size as small as > possible. I?m wondering if anyone has looked at the installed > packages list from the Redhat installation [rpm ?qa] and has parsed > out all packages not needed for * to run. I follow the custom install > guide from Andy Powell but the installation yields 948+ Meg with 340 > installed packages. I?m sure most of those packages can be > eliminated.I have a very little RedHat 9.0 installation that's about 504 MB, with asterisk+sounds+some voicemail installed. Also devel tools installed. Also apache+mysql+db, since we have many things of asterisk moved onto a mysql db... stripping away devel tools, I can manage a to have 450Mb RedHat 9.0. surely big, but very small to be a RH ;) -- Brancaleoni Matteo <mbrancaleoni@espia.it> Espia - Emmegi Srl
daryl@introspect.net
2003-Oct-31 09:57 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > David Gomillion > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:25 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Absolute Minimum Installation Packages > >[...]> > What are the benefits to a really tiny installation, aside > from possible appliance applications? Moreover, won't you > still need a sizable hard disk for voice prompts, voicemail > messages, sound file to direct people to dial the correct > extension, etc? >Maybe this isn't the point in this thread...but it's nice to know what you absolutely need so that you don't have other "junk" on the box. Less to secure....less to update. Fewer variables in general. And then you know that EVERYTHING on your box _IS_ a variable for *, rather than wondering if you're going to break something with a security update or if * doesn't use it at all. Daryl
Is there a way or an "Open Source" product that allows you to record and/or monitor calls in progress? Todd Wallace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031105/f1869250/attachment.htm