asterisk users - Aug 2003 - Version number not updating after CVS

Hello,

I have a RedHat 9.0 box, freshly installed as of about 7/15/03. I 
installed * for the first time a day or two after that, then used CVS 
to update * on 8/12/03. After that recompile the version info (from 
"show version" at the * CLI) was properly updated to: Asterisk 
CVS-08/12/03-13:06:43.

I did another CVS checkout / recompile last night, which went fine 
(no error messages after a make clean; make install, and the 
modification dates on various binaries were updated to yesterday's 
date) but Asterisk still shows "Asterisk CVS-08/12/03-13:06:43" when 
I do "show version." Any idea why that version # hasn't been
updated
after my CVS? It's a bit confusing when trying to figure out/document 
what version of * I'm running.

Thanks,

Sam

You must do a "make update" in the asterisk source directory to update
the version.  (This is equivalent to doing a "cvs update".)

Jared Smith

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:10, asterisk-users@sensecompute.com
wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a RedHat 9.0 box, freshly installed as of about 7/15/03. I 
> installed * for the first time a day or two after that, then used CVS 
> to update * on 8/12/03. After that recompile the version info (from 
> "show version" at the * CLI) was properly updated to: Asterisk 
> CVS-08/12/03-13:06:43.
> 
> I did another CVS checkout / recompile last night, which went fine 
> (no error messages after a make clean; make install, and the 
> modification dates on various binaries were updated to yesterday's 
> date) but Asterisk still shows "Asterisk CVS-08/12/03-13:06:43"
when
> I do "show version." Any idea why that version # hasn't been
updated
> after my CVS? It's a bit confusing when trying to figure out/document 
> what version of * I'm running.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users