search for: recompile

After a kernel update (but before rebooting) Is there a way to recompile Zap/Dahdi against the new kernel? My objective is to eliminate the additional downtime that occurs while recompiling/installing zap/dahdi after booting into the new kernel. Please correct me if I'm wrong: My understanding is that until you reboot (after a kernel update), recompiling zap/dah...

Dear All Is there is a way to recompile a function at runtime? It seems that I need to -like - invalidate the recompiled function to force the MCJIT to recompile it, cause when I just call runFunction, it neglects any modifications in the function code. Thanks in advance. Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering...

Hi Marwa, MCJIT doesn't provide any support for recompilation. The best you can do is use multiple MCJIT instances and destroy whichever one contains the function "foo" that you want to recompile. MCJIT does not do any dependence tracking either, so you'll also need to destroy and recompile any direct callers of "foo" (and their direct callers, and so on). If you know you want to be able to recompile a function it may be best to only call it indirectly - that way all you have...

Hi all, I am running SuSE 6.2 on a machine with 2 processors, so I just recompiled the kernel to pick up the second cpu. I now have problems using smbmount (2.0.5a that came with distrubution) or using the newer mount syntax (I just installed 2.0.6) to mount a share from an NT 4.0 server. After issuing the smbmount/mount command, and then going to the mount point, I get i/...

...mpile task itself is often done > on a separate thread. How would you deal with the updating problem in the > calling application? What sort of use cases for the JIT have you looked at > so far? > >> > > I assume the updating problem means the problem when a method gets > recompiled. Here is an algorithm to deal with that. Say A calls B. when B > gets recompiled we patch B with br helper at the beginning of its code, then > when A calls B, B branches to the helper and the helper patches the br B in > A with br newB. as we don't know all the callers of B, we have...

Hi all, I am thinking of extending a package by directly adding stuff to its C++ code. And then I have to recompile the package. Do I have to download the whole R source repository, in order to do the recompilation? What is the minimal setup requirement for such a recompilation? I am using MSVC Express 2008 on Windows, is that okay? Please give me some guidance. Thank you!

Objective: All web traffic originating from my proxy server should be forwarded through interface eth2 instead of the default eth0. The reply should take the same path back to the proxy server. Problem: On the return bout, the kernel doesn''t pass the packet to the higher layers. The reply seems to be getting tossed away between PREROUTING and INPUT Netfilter chains.

Dearest List, I guess I missed this point: Is it true that if you change the echo canceler in zconfig.h, and then recompile/install your zap modules, that for this to be taken into effect by * you must then recompile/install *? I would have figured that the zap echo cancellation method was independent of *, and I don't recall seeing any docs mentioning either way. Sincerely, Brent A. Torrenga brent.torrenga@torr...

I'm running CentOS release 4.8. For security reasons, I have to modify openssl's ssl.h in /usr/include/openssl/. That's easy. But for the new settings to take effect, I have to recompile openssl. I do have openssl-devel installed. How do I recompile? === Al

...is Dovecot trying to write the binary file? I dug into the Pigeonhole code... I think, but am certainly not sure, that lda_sieve_open() in pigeonhole/src/plugins/lda-sieve/lda-sieve-plugin.c is the relevant function calling lda_sieve_binary_save(). At the end of the function, it has: if (!recompile) lda_sieve_binary_save(srctx, sbin, script); This seems odd to me. Why is it trying to save in the "!recompile" case? It seems like it should be saving in the "recompile" case. If I'm reading this code right, recompile is set when it loads a corrupt sieve bi...

...in the example below > > Original Code > > Binary for A: Binary for B: > > ... ... > ... ... > br B ... > ... ... > ... > > After B is recompiled, we patch the entry of B with br helper > > Binary for A: Binary for B: Binary for Recompiled B > ... br helper ... > ... ... ... > br B ... ....

Looked at several posts and the installtions docs and still not clear.? If I compile source codes and then somewhere down the line add a new package, then I have to recompile my entire installation, correct?? Seems like this is the sentiment of the emails I read.

..../nmath/*.o` ../extra/tre/libtre.a -L"../../lib" -lRblas -lgfortran -lm -lquadmath -lreadline -lpcre -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lrt -ldl -lm -licuuc -licui18n /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: ../appl/dchdc.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: ../appl/dpbfa.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: ../appl/dpbsl.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object;...

...the one that triggered the recompilation threshold. The JIT > can then choose to raise the level of optimization based on the algorithm > below or some other algorithms developed later. > > > > > > IF (getCompilationCount(method) > 50 in the last 100 samples) = > > Recompile at Aggressive > > ELSE Recompile at the next optimization level. > > > > > > Even though the invocation counting introduces a few lines of binary, but > the advantages of adaptive optimization should far overweigh the extra few > lines of binary introduced. Note the ad...

...hile running some code requiring the "tcltk" package I have realised that my version of R was compiled with the Tcl/Tk libraries included in Fedora 6. It would be for me better to use the ActiveTcl libraries (which I have under /usr/local), and I'm aware that this probably means to recompile R with the proper configuration variables. But...is it by any chance possible to "just" recompile the bit affected by Tcl/Tk, like, for instance, to install tcltk with some environment variable pointing at the right ActiveTcl library? Many thanks for your suggestions and help. J --...

Recompiling kernel Hi I am using CentOS 4 and trying to recompile kernel for my AMD Thunderbird 1.4 CPU. I used a manual for fedora 3,but I can not make it. After doing #installkernel 2.6-new arch/i386/boot/bzlmage System.map My comuter says "arch/i386/boot/bzlmage no such a file or directory" Could you possibly help me where the appropriate dire...

Hello, I try to recompile syslinux-4.00 pre31 on RHEL5 with gcc-4.1.2 and nasm 2.07. Because I'm looking for information about that gpxelinux->chain.c32 hd0 boot problem I added -DDEBUG=2 to com32/lib/Makefile I get: objdump -h pxelinux.elf > pxelinux.sec perl lstadjust.pl pxelinux.lsr pxelinux.sec pxelinux....

Hi Everyone. On the Linux 2.6 kernel do I need to recompile the kernel in order to compile the zaptel modules? Thanks, Geoff

Hi, I am sorry if there is similar topic, but i couldn't find search field(only in right corner, it wasn't search on forum). Maybe very silly question, but is possible to run Application/Game for Windows(i386 arch) on Linux (for ex. Ubuntu ARM) with recompiled Wine? Default principle: Wine translate instruction from windows application to linux, then linux make known instruction on processor and return to the wine running app. Cross architecture principle: Recompiled wine for arm architecture translate windows app/game instruction for linux which s...

I have been having some problems recompiling the src.rpm for samba 2.0.5a samba-2.0.5a-0.src.rpm I used the command rpm --recompile samba-2.0.5a-0.src.rpm. But nothing apparent happens. Any one have any ideas ? Rowan [TSS] Gerber Scientific Products http://www.gspinc.com