Hi, there were some postings a few weeks ago telling that the GSM codec problem with snom100 will be fixed. But it still seems to be very quality. Will be any change in this subject? THX -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030516/2fa9d206/attachment.htm
The latest SNOM 100 firmware seems to help a bit, but GSM is still unusable. This seems to be a SNOM problem, and not an Asterisk problem, as other GSM SIP phones work fine (X-lite). -wade -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tamas Levente Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:59 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Snom100 GSM Hi, there were some postings a few weeks ago telling that the GSM codec problem with snom100 will be fixed. But it still seems to be very quality. Will be any change in this subject? THX -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030516/036aa2b3/attachment.htm
Last I heard (about a week ago) SNOM were working on it.. but no news yet.. I see that snom have new firware on the release notes page but its not available for download yet.. maybe it will be available early next week.. Lets hope it fixes the GSM problem..> Hi, there were some postings a few weeks ago telling that the GSM codec problem with snom100 will be fixed. But it still seems to be very quality. > > Will be any change in this subject? >THX -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
I too have had choppy sound when using X-ten and GSM..> On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:05:47 -0400, Wade Weppler wrote: > > >The latest SNOM 100 firmware seems to help a bit, but GSM is still unusable. > >This seems to be a SNOM problem, and not an Asterisk problem, as other GSM > >SIP phones work fine (X-lite). > > Are you sure ?? > > with the x-ten lite, gsm seems choppy, yet g711 is clear as a bell. > > i'm wondering that maybe is might be a gsm prob ? > > > > > > > >-wade > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com > >[mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tamas Levente > >Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:59 AM > >To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Snom100 GSM > > > > > > > >Hi, there were some postings a few weeks ago telling that the GSM codec > >problem with snom100 will be fixed. But it still seems to be very quality. > > > > > > > >Will be any change in this subject? > > > > > > > >THX > > > > > > . > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
See, so there should be an option in asterisk sip conf or somewhere which codec to use. Tha M$GSM or the GSM. Cos it's really a bad thing to use snom 100 on DSL with uncomressed audio. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Critchfield" <critch@basesys.com> To: <levi@televersions.com> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 5:24 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Snom100 GSM> On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 10:13, Gary wrote: > > On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:05:47 -0400, Wade Weppler wrote: > > > > >The latest SNOM 100 firmware seems to help a bit, but GSM is stillunusable.> > >This seems to be a SNOM problem, and not an Asterisk problem, as otherGSM> > >SIP phones work fine (X-lite). > > > > Are you sure ?? > > > > with the x-ten lite, gsm seems choppy, yet g711 is clear as a bell. > > > > i'm wondering that maybe is might be a gsm prob ? > > For those that either cross between linux and windows, be aware that the > way GSM is represented is different. A GSM frame is 32.5 bytes. On > Windows they place 2 32.5 byte frames together shifting the second frame > down half a byte to make a 65 byte packet containing 2 frames. On unix > systems, it is standard to just ignore the final 4 bits of the frame, > and therefore we can transmit in 33 byte packets a frame and we don't > use any bit shifting. I'm sure this is where most problems with GSM come > from. > -- > Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Actually this is waht happens in connection with it: WARNING[16400]: File dsp.c, Line 1107 (ast_dsp_process): Unable to detect process 2 frames ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tamas Levente" <levi@tamisoft.com> To: <levi@televersions.com> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 5:42 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom100 GSM> See, so there should be an option in asterisk sip conf or somewhere which > codec to use. Tha M$GSM or the GSM. Cos it's really a bad thing to usesnom> 100 on DSL with uncomressed audio. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Critchfield" <critch@basesys.com> > To: <levi@televersions.com> > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 5:24 PM > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Snom100 GSM > > > > On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 10:13, Gary wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:05:47 -0400, Wade Weppler wrote: > > > > > > >The latest SNOM 100 firmware seems to help a bit, but GSM is still > unusable. > > > >This seems to be a SNOM problem, and not an Asterisk problem, asother> GSM > > > >SIP phones work fine (X-lite). > > > > > > Are you sure ?? > > > > > > with the x-ten lite, gsm seems choppy, yet g711 is clear as a bell. > > > > > > i'm wondering that maybe is might be a gsm prob ? > > > > For those that either cross between linux and windows, be aware that the > > way GSM is represented is different. A GSM frame is 32.5 bytes. On > > Windows they place 2 32.5 byte frames together shifting the second frame > > down half a byte to make a 65 byte packet containing 2 frames. On unix > > systems, it is standard to just ignore the final 4 bits of the frame, > > and therefore we can transmit in 33 byte packets a frame and we don't > > use any bit shifting. I'm sure this is where most problems with GSM come > > from. > > -- > > Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >