Same here Michael and the PocketPC version seems unaudible with any codec; early
days trying that though.
Simon
-----Original Message-----
>From: "Michael Van Donselaar"<mvand@neb.rr.com>
>Sent: 22/04/03 04:10:24
>To:
"asterisk-users@lists.digium.com"<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
>
>On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:35:08 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>I have tried the Xten this morning, the sound is very good!
>>
>
>I have gotten good results with ulaw codec, but when I use GSM, I get
>choppy sound, like I'm talking into a fan. Anyone else get this?
>
>>john
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Clay Graner" <Clay@CTITec.com>
>>To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
>>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:07 AM
>>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
>>
>>
>>> If xten networks would add IAX capability that would be even
better. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com
>>> [mailto:as?terisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of it
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:23 PM
>>> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
>>>
>>> If it could be embeded into our windows applications,then that
would be
>>> wonderful!
>>>
>>> john
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "William Walsh" <william@wxw.org>
>>> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 15:58, Jim Flagg wrote:
>>> > > http://www.xten.com/products.php
>>> > >
>>> > > Anybody using it with *?
>>> > >
>>> > > William Walsh was beta testing it, not sure if he used
it with *.
>>> > >
>>>
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008265.html
>>> >
>>> > I did. It worked very well, but the issue with it still
not
>>> supporting
>>> > selectable sound device configuration in the PC Version is
reason
>>> enough
>>> > to reject it for regular use at the moment IMO. If they
solve that
>>> > issue, then it will be, again IMO, the best SIP softphone
for the PC
>>> > market. And I've done more than enough testing of SIP
softphones to
>>> be
>>> > able to say that (from an end user point of view) :)
>>> >
>>> > It's attractive, easy to use, fully functional, and is
from a company
>>> > that has been very responsive to customers (at least in
their beta
>>> > program).
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > William Walsh <william@wxw.org>
>>> > Jabber: william@wxw.biz
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
>>> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
