Effie Greathouse
2008-Nov-12 00:34 UTC
[R] different results with plot.glm vs. plot.glm(which=c(2))
I am running GLM models using the gamma family. For example: model <-glm(y ~ x, family=Gamma(link="identity")) I am getting different results for the normal Q-Q plot and the Scale-Location plot if I run the diagnostic plots without specifying the plot vs. specifying the plot ... e.g., "plot(model)" gives me a different Normal Q-Q graph than "plot(model, which=c(2))" ... can anyone tell me why that would be? Shouldn't they be the same? I have read the documentation on plot.lm and searched the help archives, but I am still learning GLM's and I'm not very familiar with understanding diagnostic plots for GLM's, so any help would be much appreciated! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Maybe Matching Threads
- different results with plot.lm vs. plot.lm(which=c(2))
- who can explain the difference between the R and SAS on the results of GLM
- glm questions
- Different results in glm() probit model using vector vs. two-column matrix response
- accuracy of GLM dispersion parameters