On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Bob Farmer wrote:
> Hi.
> It's my understanding that a cross-correlation function of vectors x
> and y at lag zero is equivalent to their correlation (or covariance,
> depending on how the ccf is defined).
The ratio of your values is
> MASS::fractions(282568.5/259021)
[1] 12/11
? Do you recognize it?
There is an explanation in MASS4, p. 390, for example.
> If this is true, could somebody please explain why I get an
> inconsistent result between cov() and ccf(type = "covariance"),
but a
> consistent result between cor() and ccf(type = "correlation")?
> Or have I misunderstood what is a cross-correlation?
> (unfortunately, I can't seem to get a look at the ccf code, since I
> think it's buried in some C function outside of the main environment)
It is in the R sources, not 'buried' at all - that is what 'Open
Source'
means. You can browse them at https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk, or
download them for study.
> Thanks very much.
> --Bob Farmer
> PhD candidate, Dalhousie University
> Halifax, NS, Canada
>
> Example:
> d1<-data.frame(matrix(ldeaths, nrow = 6, byrow = T))
> seventy_4<-as.numeric(d1[1,])
> seventy_5<-as.numeric(d1[2,])
>
> ccf(x=seventy_4, y=seventy_5,
> plot = F, lag.max = 0, type = "covariance"
> )
> cov(seventy_4, seventy_5) #inconsistent
>
> ccf(x=seventy_4, y=seventy_5,
> plot = F, lag.max = 0, type = "correlation"
> )
> cor(seventy_4, seventy_5) #consistent
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595