k.jewell at campden.co.uk
2008-Feb-15 11:16 UTC
[R] Poisson-lognormal probability calculations
Hi, just for the record, although I don't think it's relevant (!) -------------------------------------> sessionInfo()R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03) i386-pc-mingw32 locale: LC_COLLATE=English_United Kingdom.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United Kingdom.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United Kingdom.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United Kingdom.1252 attached base packages: [1] stats4 splines stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] VGAM_0.7-5 xlsReadWrite_1.3.2 -------------------------------- I'm having some problems with a Poisson-lognormal density (mass?) function. VGAM has the dpolono function, but that doesn't work for x-values over 170, and I need to go to *much* bigger numbers. It fails first because of gamma overflow, then because of non-finite integrand. ---------------------> VGAM::dpolono(170)[1] 4.808781e-09> VGAM::dpolono(171)[1] 0 Warning message: In VGAM::dpolono(171) : value out of range in 'gammafn'> VGAM::dpolono(172)[1] 0 Warning message: In VGAM::dpolono(172) : value out of range in 'gammafn'> VGAM::dpolono(173)[1] 0 Warning message: In VGAM::dpolono(173) : value out of range in 'gammafn'> VGAM::dpolono(174)Error in integrate(f = integrand, lower = -Inf, upper = Inf, x = x[i], : non-finite function value ------------- I tidied up a little (to my eyes only, no offence intended to the estimable authors of VGAM) and avoided the gamma overflow by using logs - OK so far, it agrees almost perfectly with VGAM::dpolono for x up to 170, and now extends the range up to 173 (wow!!). ------------- dApolono <- function (x, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1, ...) { require(stats) integrand <- function(t, x, meanlog, sdlog) exp(-t+x*log(t)-log(sdlog*t*sqrt(2*pi))-0.5*((log(t)-meanlog)/sdlog)^2) mapply(function(x, meanlog, sdlog, ...){ temp <- try( integrate(f = integrand, lower = 0, upper = Inf, x = x, meanlog meanlog, sdlog = sdlog, ...) ) ifelse(inherits(temp, "try-error"), NA, exp(log(temp$value)-lgamma(x+1))) } , x, meanlog, sdlog, ... ) } plot(log(dApolono(0:173))) dApolono(174) ----------------------------- Addressing the non-finite integrand, I noticed that the gamma(x+1) divisor was outside the integrand so that as x gets bigger the integrand gets bigger, only to be finally divided by an increasing gamma(x+1). I reasoned that putting the divisor inside the integral might incur a substantial performance hit, but would keep the integrand at reasonable values. -------------------------------------- dApolono <- function (x, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1, ...) { require(stats) integrand <- function(t, x, meanlog, sdlog) exp(-t+x*log(t)-log(sdlog*t*sqrt(2*pi))-0.5*((log(t)-meanlog)/sdlog)^2-lgamm a(x+1)) mapply(function(x, meanlog, sdlog, ...){ temp <- try( integrate(f = integrand, lower = 0, upper = Inf, x = x, meanlog meanlog, sdlog = sdlog, ...) ) ifelse(inherits(temp, "try-error"), NA, temp$value) } , x, meanlog, sdlog, ... ) } plot(log(dApolono(0:173))) dApolono(174) dApolono(1E3) ------------------------- This avoids the non-finite integrand and gives me answers at much higher x, but now at least some of the answers are wrong (not to say silly), even in the range where the other versions worked. I've tried other variations including changing the variable of integration to log(t) and integrating dpois()*dlnorm(), but I can't fix it; if the factorial (=gamma) is inside the integrand I get silly answers, if it's outside I get non-finite integrand. I'm tearing my hair. Can anyone suggest where I may be going wrong? Any suggestions at all will be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Keith Jewell mailto:k.jewell at campden.co.uk telephone (direct) +44 (0)1386 842055 _____________________________________________________________________ The information in this document and attachments is given after the exercise of all reasonable care and skill in its compilation, preparation and issue, but is provided without liability in its application or use. It may contain privileged information that is exempt from disclosure by law and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this document in error please notify us and delete this message from your system immediately. Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association Group; Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association (company limited by guarantee),registered number 510618); CCFRA Group Services Ltd. (registered number 3841905); and CCFRA Technology Ltd (registered number 3836922), all registered in England and Wales with the registered office at Station Road, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire, GL55 6LD. The Group may monitor e-mail traffic data and also the content of e-mail for the purposes of security and staff training. Any advice given is subject to our normal terms and conditions of trading, a copy of which is available on request. ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by MessageL...{{dropped:2}}
Maybe Matching Threads
- Behaviour of integrate (was 'Poisson-lognormal probability calcul ations')
- Solved (??) Behaviour of integrate (was 'Poisson-lognormal probab ility calculations')
- Design and analysis of mixture experiments
- Truncated Lognormal Distribution
- Lognormal distribution