I have been using lmer in lme4() to analyse the effect of dropping a term from the model as below anova.name<-anova(m1,m2) Where m1 is an original model and m2 has one term removed. I can then create my own type III tables for each variable in the model. However with many variables this becomes exceedingly time consuming! anova.lme in nlme() and Anova() in car dont seem to work for lme objects created with lmer? Is there any other way to create type III tables? Any help much appreciated. Simon P Simon Pickett Centre for Ecology and Conservation Biology University of Exeter in Cornwall Tremough Campus Penryn Cornwall TR10 9EZ UK Tel: 01326371852
sp219 <S.Pickett at exeter.ac.uk> writes:> I have been using lmer in lme4() to analyse the effect of dropping a term from > the model as below > anova.name<-anova(m1,m2) > Where m1 is an original model and m2 has one term removed. I can then create > my own type III tables for each variable in the model. However with many > variables this becomes exceedingly time consuming! > anova.lme in nlme() and Anova() in car dont seem to work for lme objects > created with lmer? Is there any other way to create type III tables? > Any help much appreciated. > Simon PI haven't played nearly as much with lme4 as I perhaps should have, but my first try would be to see whether drop1 works on lmer models. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ??ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
Possibly Parallel Threads
- coercing created variables into a new data frame using na.omit()
- help with structuring random factors using lmer()
- [SPAM] - RE: REML with random slopes and random intercepts giving strange results - Bayesian Filter detected spam
- help:coerce lmer.coef to matrix
- help: trouble using lines()