Karl Knoblick
2003-Nov-16 16:27 UTC
[R] SE of ANOVA (aov) with repeated measures and a bewtween-subject factor
Hallo! I have data of the following design: NSubj were measured at Baseline (visit 1) and at 3 following time points (visit 2, visit 3, visit 4). There is or is not a treatment. Most interesting is the question if there is a difference in treatment between the results of visit 4 and baseline. (The other time points are also of interest.) The level of significance is alpha=0.0179 (because of an interim analysis). My questions: 1) I prefer calculating s model with the differences to baseline as Y: Y ~ treat*visit + Error(treat:id) where treat is the treatment and id is the subject's id Other possibilities are: a) Y0 ~ treat*visit + v1 + Error(treat:id) where Y0 are the results (visit 2 to visit 4) and v1 is the result of visit 1 as covariate b) Calculating a t-test with the results of visit 4 and visit 1 What's best? 2) When calculating a model (ANOVA) I have to calculate the treatment effect (easy with coef(...)). But how can I get the standard errors, or more exactly the 98.21% confidence intervals? - lm() does not work with an Error()-term in the formula - using lme(), I can not reproduce results e.g. of an example of a text book ((Bortz, Statistik f?r Sozialwissenschaftler, p.412, 3. Auflage, see at the very end) Here what I have done (with random data): # Random generation of data NSubj<-30 # No. of subjects set.seed(1234) id<-c(1:NSubj) # ID of subjects treat<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) > 0.5 # Treatment v1<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 1 Baseline) v2<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 2 v3<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 3 v4<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 4 # Making the data frame Y<-c(v2-v1,v3-v1,v4-v1) # Taking the differences to baseline (visit 1) id<-as.factor(rep(id, 3)) treat<-as.factor(rep(treat, 3)) visit<-as.factor(rep(2:4, each=NSubj)) df<-data.frame(id, treat, visit, Y) # Analysis df.aov <- aov(Y ~ treat*visit + Error(treat:id), data=df) summary(df.aov) coef(df.aov) How can I get the SE? Hope somebody can help! Karl Example (Bortz, Statistik f?r Sozialwissenschaftler, p.412, 3. Auflage), two-factorial analysis of variance with repeated measurements: Subject b1 b2 b3 al 1 56 52 48 al 2 57 54 46 al 3 55 51 51 al 4 58 51 50 al 5 54 53 46 a2 1 54 50 49 a2 2 53 49 48 a2 3 56 48 52 a2 4 52 52 50 a2 5 55 51 46 a3 1 57 49 50 a3 2 55 51 47 a3 3 56 48 51 a3 4 58 50 48 a3 5 58 46 52 The factors are A (a1,a2,a3) and B (b1,b2,b3); 5 subjects. Factor A is kind of training (creativity) for the subjacts and factor B is before, during and after training. The results of the example: Source SS df sigma2 F A 9.9 2 4.95 3.87 Subject in sample 15.4 12 1.28 between subjects 25.3 14 B 370.7 2 185.35 44.03 (**) AxB 45.6 4 11.4 2.71 BxSubject 101.0 24 4.21 within subjects 517.3 30 Total 542.6 44
Spencer Graves
2003-Nov-16 17:21 UTC
[R] SE of ANOVA (aov) with repeated measures and a bewtween-subject factor
Have you looked at Pinhiero and Bates (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus (Springer)? Bates and his graduate students, including Pinhiero, wrote "lme". This book has good examples that helped me solve problems like this. hope this helps. spencer graves Karl Knoblick wrote:>Hallo! > >I have data of the following design: >NSubj were measured at Baseline (visit 1) and at 3 >following time points (visit 2, visit 3, visit 4). >There is or is not a treatment. > >Most interesting is the question if there is a >difference in treatment between the results of visit 4 >and baseline. (The other time points are also of >interest.) The level of significance is alpha=0.0179 >(because of an interim analysis). > >My questions: > >1) I prefer calculating s model with the differences >to baseline as Y: >Y ~ treat*visit + Error(treat:id) >where treat is the treatment and id is the subject's >id >Other possibilities are: >a) Y0 ~ treat*visit + v1 + Error(treat:id) >where Y0 are the results (visit 2 to visit 4) and v1 >is the result of visit 1 as covariate >b) Calculating a t-test with the results of visit 4 >and visit 1 >What's best? > >2) When calculating a model (ANOVA) I have to >calculate the treatment effect (easy with coef(...)). >But how can I get the standard errors, or more exactly >the 98.21% confidence > >intervals? >- lm() does not work with an Error()-term in the >formula >- using lme(), I can not reproduce results e.g. of an >example of a text book ((Bortz, >Statistik f?r Sozialwissenschaftler, p.412, 3. >Auflage, see at the very end) > >Here what I have done (with random data): > > # Random generation of data > NSubj<-30 # No. of subjects > set.seed(1234) > id<-c(1:NSubj) # ID of subjects > treat<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) > 0.5 # Treatment > v1<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 1 >Baseline) > v2<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 2 > v3<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 3 > v4<-runif(NSubj, min=0, max=1) # Result visit 4 > > # Making the data frame > Y<-c(v2-v1,v3-v1,v4-v1) # Taking the differences to >baseline (visit 1) > id<-as.factor(rep(id, 3)) > treat<-as.factor(rep(treat, 3)) > visit<-as.factor(rep(2:4, each=NSubj)) > df<-data.frame(id, treat, visit, Y) > > # Analysis > df.aov <- aov(Y ~ treat*visit + Error(treat:id), >data=df) > summary(df.aov) > coef(df.aov) > >How can I get the SE? > >Hope somebody can help! > >Karl > >Example (Bortz, Statistik f?r Sozialwissenschaftler, >p.412, 3. Auflage), two-factorial > >analysis of variance with repeated measurements: > > Subject b1 b2 b3 >al 1 56 52 48 >al 2 57 54 46 >al 3 55 51 51 >al 4 58 51 50 >al 5 54 53 46 >a2 1 54 50 49 >a2 2 53 49 48 >a2 3 56 48 52 >a2 4 52 52 50 >a2 5 55 51 46 >a3 1 57 49 50 >a3 2 55 51 47 >a3 3 56 48 51 >a3 4 58 50 48 >a3 5 58 46 52 > >The factors are A (a1,a2,a3) and B (b1,b2,b3); 5 >subjects. Factor A is >kind of training (creativity) for the subjacts and >factor B is before, >during and after training. > >The results of the example: > >Source SS df sigma2 F >A 9.9 2 4.95 3.87 >Subject in sample 15.4 12 1.28 >between subjects 25.3 14 >B 370.7 2 185.35 44.03 (**) >AxB 45.6 4 11.4 2.71 >BxSubject 101.0 24 4.21 >within subjects 517.3 30 >Total 542.6 44 > >______________________________________________ >R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list >https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > >
Apparently Analagous Threads
- nlme cross-over and fixed nested
- dovecot Buch 2014 vs 2016
- Result depends on order of factors in unbalanced designs (lme, anova)?
- Layout of mulitpage conditioned lattice plots
- Non-parametric test for repeated measures and post-hoc single comparisons in R?