Hi, I am building r-patch from the sources (rsync-ed today). make check produced the following message: running tests of Internet and socket functions expect some differences make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/evahome/vograno/R/tests' running code in 'internet.R' ... OK comparing 'internet.Rout' to './internet.Rout.save' ...18c18 < Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 134991 bytes ---> Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 124178 bytes22,23c22,23 < .......... .......... .......... . < downloaded 131Kb ---> .......... .......... . > downloaded 121Kb25c25 < [1] 273 ---> [1] 25160,61d59 < Error in url(" <http://foo.bar> http://foo.bar", "r") : unable to open connection < In addition: Warning message: 62a61> Error in url(" <http://foo.bar> http://foo.bar", "r") : unable to openconnection 365,370c364 < Login: root Name: root < Directory: /root Shell: /bin/tcsh < Last login Wed Nov 5 13:34 (PST) on pts/1 from verdi.irisfinancial.com < New mail received Wed Nov 5 04:02 2003 (PST) < Unread since Fri Oct 24 04:02 2003 (PDT ) < No Plan. ---> Error in make.socket(host, port) : Socket not establishedOK I noticed that I had to expect some differences so my question is how to tell whether it's harmless or not? Other questions are related to building of recommended packages: * The src/library/Recommended directory was empty. Is it expected? If yes, how to download the entire bundle of recommended packages (I know I can get them one by one)? Is install.packaes() the recommended way? * make check tried to test MASS and survival (and failed because the packages were not there), but it didn't try to test the other recommended packages. Why only these two? Thanks, Vadim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Hi Vadim, On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:24:31PM -0800, Vadim Ogranovich wrote:> I am building r-patch from the sources (rsync-ed today).[...]> Other questions are related to building of recommended packages: > * The src/library/Recommended directory was empty. Is it expected? If > yes, how to download the entire bundle of recommended packages (I know IExecute the script $ src/tools/recommended-rsync which fetch them for you. I call that each time I create Debian packages of pre-releases, or of patch releases (as so far on 10/24 and 11/01). Cheers, Dirk -- Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others. -- Groucho Marx
Vadim Ogranovich wrote: ...> I am building r-patch from the sources (rsync-ed today). > > make check produced the following message: > > running tests of Internet and socket functions > expect some differences... assorted error messages, then ...> OK > > > > I noticed that I had to expect some differences so my question is how to > tell whether it's harmless or not?The "OK". If made exited without an error, the regression tests were passed. In this case, the differences between the maintainers' results and yours were due to local login and network setup differences. Hope that helps Jason -- Indigo Industrial Controls Ltd. http://www.indigoindustrial.co.nz 64-21-343-545 jasont at indigoindustrial.co.nz
I thought about the "OK". However the MASS and the survival tests printed "OK" too, though, as far as I could tell, the packages were not installed at all (well, maybe this was the reason for calling it "OK") Thank you for the answer. Now I think I can move forward, Vadim> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Turner [mailto:jasont at indigoindustrial.co.nz] > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:50 PM > To: vograno at yahoo.com > Cc: R-Help > Subject: Re: [R] building r-patch > > > Vadim Ogranovich wrote: > ... > > I am building r-patch from the sources (rsync-ed today). > > > > make check produced the following message: > > > > running tests of Internet and socket functions > > expect some differences > ... assorted error messages, then ... > > OK > > > > > > > > I noticed that I had to expect some differences so my > question is how > > to tell whether it's harmless or not? > > The "OK". If made exited without an error, the regression tests were > passed. In this case, the differences between the > maintainers' results > and yours were due to local login and network setup differences. > > Hope that helps > > Jason > -- > Indigo Industrial Controls Ltd. > http://www.indigoindustrial.co.nz 64-21-343-> 545 > jasont at indigoindustrial.co.nz > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo> /r-help >
The first is more or less what you should expect. On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Vadim Ogranovich wrote:> Hi, > > I am building r-patch from the sources (rsync-ed today). > > make check produced the following message: > > running tests of Internet and socket functions > expect some differences > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/evahome/vograno/R/tests' > running code in 'internet.R' ... OK > comparing 'internet.Rout' to './internet.Rout.save' ...18c18 > < Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 134991 bytes > --- > > Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 124178 bytes > 22,23c22,23 > < .......... .......... .......... . > < downloaded 131Kb > --- > > .......... .......... . > > downloaded 121Kb > 25c25 > < [1] 273 > --- > > [1] 251 > 60,61d59 > < Error in url(" <http://foo.bar> http://foo.bar", "r") : unable to open > connection > < In addition: Warning message: > 62a61 > > Error in url(" <http://foo.bar> http://foo.bar", "r") : unable to open > connection > 365,370c364 > < Login: root Name: root > < Directory: /root Shell: /bin/tcsh > < Last login Wed Nov 5 13:34 (PST) on pts/1 from > verdi.irisfinancial.com > < New mail received Wed Nov 5 04:02 2003 (PST) > < Unread since Fri Oct 24 04:02 2003 (PDT ) > < No Plan. > --- > > Error in make.socket(host, port) : Socket not established > OK > > > > I noticed that I had to expect some differences so my question is how to > tell whether it's harmless or not? > > > Other questions are related to building of recommended packages: > * The src/library/Recommended directory was empty. Is it expected?No. You forgot to run tools/rsync-recommended in the sources.> If > yes, how to download the entire bundle of recommended packages (I know I > can get them one by one)? Is install.packaes() the recommended way? > * make check tried to test MASS and survival (and failed because the > packages were not there), but it didn't try to test the other > recommended packages. Why only these two?It did not test those packages, it tried to make use of them. make check-all would have tested the recommended packages. -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595