Can someone please suggest me a good visual editor for rhtml files? Something capable to switch from rhtml source to preview in browser (like dreamweaver) Does exists some open source tool? thank you all. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I am currently using the MyEclipseIDE with the Ruby and Rails plugins. I have also used Dreamweaver for more of a layout editor. Jason On 3/31/06, fabio vitale <mc3356@mclink.it> wrote:> > Can someone please suggest me a good visual editor for rhtml files? > Something capable to switch from rhtml source to preview in browser > (like dreamweaver) > Does exists some open source tool? > thank you all. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060331/83e44333/attachment.html
Jason West wrote:> I am currently using the MyEclipseIDE with the Ruby and Rails plugins. > I > have also used Dreamweaver for more of a layout editor. > > JasonSame, I like MyEclipse with the RDT and RadRails plugins. MyEclipse MAY be overkill for you as it''s geared mostly to heavy Java and J2EE coding, but I do like the CSS and HTML editors (which I use instead of the editors that come with RDT/Rad). Of course, MyEclipse is highly optional and you can just use Eclipse 3.1 with RDT/Rad. G -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Get a mac, and TextMate. Julian. On 01/04/2006, at 2:22 AM, Jason West wrote:> I am currently using the MyEclipseIDE with the Ruby and Rails > plugins. I have also used Dreamweaver for more of a layout editor. > > Jason > > On 3/31/06, fabio vitale <mc3356@mclink.it> wrote: Can someone > please suggest me a good visual editor for rhtml files? > Something capable to switch from rhtml source to preview in browser > (like dreamweaver) > Does exists some open source tool? > thank you all. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
Gerald Anderson wrote: <snip>> > Same, I like MyEclipse with the RDT and RadRails plugins. > <snip> > GWhy not just use radrails or plain vanilla eclipse with RDT and RadRails plugins. What does MyEclipse offer that makes it worth paying for? joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Joe Percival wrote:> Gerald Anderson wrote: > <snip> > >>Same, I like MyEclipse with the RDT and RadRails plugins. >><snip> >>G > > > Why not just use radrails or plain vanilla eclipse with RDT and RadRails > plugins. What does MyEclipse offer that makes it worth paying for? > joe >The MyEclipse HTML(and JSP) editor has a visual editor a la dreamweaver. That''s what the OP was asking for... immediate visual gratification. However, I would recommend to that poster that he push himself to edit the source directly. You get much closer to your markup that way and Rails makes this pretty easy since you can just make a little change in the rhtml and switch to the browser and hit refresh. It can be really helpful to have an html editor that flags unclosed tags though... which I haven''t seen yet for rails, er, actually that''s another thing that MyEclipse (I think) would offer. b PS: I paid for MyEclipse for two years, but it''s bugginess drove me crazy. I just use the Eclipse WebTools project now.
Joe Percival wrote:> Gerald Anderson wrote: > <snip> >> >> Same, I like MyEclipse with the RDT and RadRails plugins. >> <snip> >> G > > Why not just use radrails or plain vanilla eclipse with RDT and RadRails > plugins. What does MyEclipse offer that makes it worth paying for? > joeBecause I''m a professional java/j2ee coder ; ) For $29 though, I think the CSS and HTML editors in MyEclipse would still be worth the money. My $0.02 anyway. G -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.