Hi, all We met a problem on gcc version. When we build xen-unstable version 8767 and found the following problem in x86-32. (1)When we use gcc version above or equal 3.4.3, HVM could be successfully start (2)When we use gcc version below 3.4.3, HVM starting will fail. But latest version 8793 could be built in gcc 3.4.2, and VMX works well. So my question, what gcc version and build platform is preferred by XEN? Thanks in advance. ping _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 9 Feb 2006, at 02:39, Yu, Ping Y wrote:> We met a problem on gcc version. When we build xen-unstable version > 8767 > and found the following problem in x86-32. > (1)When we use gcc version above or equal 3.4.3, HVM could be > successfully start > (2)When we use gcc version below 3.4.3, HVM starting will fail. > > But latest version 8793 could be built in gcc 3.4.2, and VMX works > well. > > So my question, what gcc version and build platform is preferred by > XEN? > Thanks in advance.We generally use 3.3.x or 3.4.x. I use FC3''s 3.4.2 mostly. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote on 02/09/2006 04:03:38 AM:> > On 9 Feb 2006, at 02:39, Yu, Ping Y wrote: > > > We met a problem on gcc version. When we build xen-unstable version > > 8767 > > and found the following problem in x86-32. > > (1)When we use gcc version above or equal 3.4.3, HVM could be > > successfully start > > (2)When we use gcc version below 3.4.3, HVM starting will fail. > > > > But latest version 8793 could be built in gcc 3.4.2, and VMX works > > well. > > > > So my question, what gcc version and build platform is preferred by > > XEN? > > Thanks in advance. > > We generally use 3.3.x or 3.4.x. I use FC3''s 3.4.2 mostly.I have noticed that we could not start an HVM domain starting with the following changeset: changeset: 8752:0e7bdd973e17 user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk date: Fri Feb 3 05:02:30 2006 +0100 summary: Build the phys_to_machine_mapping array in Xen rather than I am using FC3''s gcc 3.4.2 as well. We also see this problem with SLES9 SP2''s gcc 4.0.2. However, prior to the above changeset, we did not have any problem with starting HVM domains in 32-bit at all. Maybe this particular changeset was not compiled correctly by some gcc version ? Thanks. Regards, Khoa> > -- Keir > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 9 Feb 2006, at 21:01, Khoa Huynh wrote:> I have noticed that we could not start an HVM domain starting with > the following changeset: > > changeset: 8752:0e7bdd973e17 > user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > date: Fri Feb 3 05:02:30 2006 +0100 > summary: Build the phys_to_machine_mapping array in Xen rather than > > I am using FC3''s gcc 3.4.2 as well. We also see this problem with > SLES9 SP2''s gcc 4.0.2. However, prior to the above changeset, we > did not have any problem with starting HVM domains in 32-bit at all. > Maybe this particular changeset was not compiled correctly by some > gcc version ?We would expect it to work with those versions of gcc. If it doesn''t, we welcome patches. :-) -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel