Dong, Eddie
2006-Feb-09 07:07 UTC
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
Alex Williamson wrote:> itself. Could we be setting some flag and adding the test to the > existing in_interrupt/local_softirq_pending check? This looks rather > precarious. Thanks, >Alex: Will that be funny if we embed return_to_guest check in no matter in_interrupt() or local_softirq_pending() check? How about to add a new MACRO return_to_guest() and check in parallel with in_interrupt() and local_softirq_pending()? Thx,eddie _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Alex Williamson
2006-Feb-09 15:09 UTC
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 15:07 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:> Alex Williamson wrote: > > itself. Could we be setting some flag and adding the test to the > > existing in_interrupt/local_softirq_pending check? This looks rather > > precarious. Thanks, > > > Alex: > Will that be funny if we embed return_to_guest check in no > matter in_interrupt() or local_softirq_pending() check? How about to add > a new MACRO return_to_guest() and check in parallel with in_interrupt() > and local_softirq_pending()?Yeah, that''s what I was suggesting. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel