Xen devel - Oct 2006 - Much difference between netperf results on every run

Hi all,

the throughput measured by netperf differs from time to time.  The
changeset was xen-unstable.hg C/S 11760.  This is observed when I
executed a netperf on DomU connecting to a netserver on Dom0 in the
same box.  The observed throughput was between 185Mbps to 3854Mbps.  I
have never seen such a difference on ia64.

Regards,
Hiroya


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

INAKOSHI Hiroya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the throughput measured by netperf differs from time to time. The
> changeset was xen-unstable.hg C/S 11760. This is observed when I
> executed a netperf on DomU connecting to a netserver on Dom0 in the
> same box. The observed throughput was between 185Mbps to 3854Mbps. I
> have never seen such a difference on ia64.
>
> Regards,
> Hiroya
I am also seeing this, but with not as much variability. Actually I am
seeing significantly less throughput (1/6th) for dom0->domU then
domU->dom0, and for dom0->domU, I am seeing +/- 15% variability. I am
looking in to it, but so far I have not discovered anything.

So you know what cpus the domU and dom0 are using? You might try pinning the
domains to cpus and see what happens.

-Andrew
~


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 19/10/06 7:56 pm, "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
>> the throughput measured by netperf differs from time to time. The
>> changeset was xen-unstable.hg C/S 11760. This is observed when I
>> executed a netperf on DomU connecting to a netserver on Dom0 in the
>> same box. The observed throughput was between 185Mbps to 3854Mbps. I
>> have never seen such a difference on ia64.
> 
> I am also seeing this, but with not as much variability. Actually I am
> seeing significantly less throughput (1/6th) for dom0->domU then
> domU->dom0, and for dom0->domU, I am seeing +/- 15% variability. I am
> looking in to it, but so far I have not discovered anything.
> 
> So you know what cpus the domU and dom0 are using? You might try pinning
the
> domains to cpus and see what happens.
Current suspicion is packet loss due to insufficient receive buffers. Try
specifying module option "netback.queue_length=100" in domain 0.
We''re
working on a proper fix for 3.0.3-1.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, Andrew and Keir,

sorry for the delayed response.

1/ The updated results shows that there is still a large (about +/-75%) 
deviation on netperf throughput even with vcpu-pin.
2/ The throughput was rather worse with queue_length=100 (but it was not 
significant in accordance with t-test.)  Its deviation was still large. 
  My expectation was that the throughput would be better with less 
packet loss and that its deviation would get smaller.

                      Dom-0 to Dom-U  Dom-U to Dom-0
------------------------------------------------------
default queue_length 975.06(+/-5.11) 386.04(+/-292.30)
queue_length=100     954.31(+/-3.03) 293.41(+/-180.94)
                                       (unit: Mbps)

The Xen version was unstable C/S 11834.  The number of vcpus is one for 
each Domains.  Vcpu-pin is configured so that a logical processor is 
dedicated to each vcpu.

For comparison, the results for ia64 with the same vcpu-pin 
configuration are below (Xen version: ia64-unstable C/S 11961.)

                      Dom-0 to Dom-U  Dom-U to Dom-0
------------------------------------------------------
default queue_length 279.27(+/-5.78) 1444.7(+/-10.06)
queue_length=100     278.37(+/-3.84) 1498.90(+/-12.02)
                                       (unit: Mbps)

Regards,
Hiroya


Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 19/10/06 7:56 pm, "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> 
>>> the throughput measured by netperf differs from time to time. The
>>> changeset was xen-unstable.hg C/S 11760. This is observed when I
>>> executed a netperf on DomU connecting to a netserver on Dom0 in the
>>> same box. The observed throughput was between 185Mbps to 3854Mbps.
I
>>> have never seen such a difference on ia64.
>> I am also seeing this, but with not as much variability. Actually I am
>> seeing significantly less throughput (1/6th) for dom0->domU then
>> domU->dom0, and for dom0->domU, I am seeing +/- 15% variability.
I am
>> looking in to it, but so far I have not discovered anything.
>>
>> So you know what cpus the domU and dom0 are using? You might try
pinning the
>> domains to cpus and see what happens.
> 
> Current suspicion is packet loss due to insufficient receive buffers. Try
> specifying module option "netback.queue_length=100" in domain 0.
We''re
> working on a proper fix for 3.0.3-1.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel