Wout Mertens
2009-Jul-10 11:47 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Status of zpool remove in raidz and non-redundant stripes
You''re right - in my company (a very big one) we just stumbled across this as well and we''re strongly considering not using ZFS because of it. It''s easy to type zpool add when you meant zpool replace - and then you can go rebuild your box because it was the root pool. Nice. At the very least, "zpool add" should have more warnings. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Gal Buki
2011-Jan-17 15:49 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Status of zpool remove in raidz and non-redundant stripes
I second that. This is exactly what happened to me. There is a bug (ID 4852783) that is in State "6-Fix Understood" but it is unchanged since February 2010. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org