hi, i''m trying the new 3.2.0. i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: Replace (network-script network-bridge) with (network-script network-bridge-both) in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp The content of network-bridge-both is ************ #!/bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 ************ As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... Now, it doesn''t work anymore... when the xen loads.... there''s only this in the ifconfig command: -lo -peth0 -peth1 What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... #!/bin/sh XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 NOTE:: The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to eth<n>. New method; a. rename device eth0 to peth0 b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 !! Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. Gareth. ----- Original Message ----- step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 hi, i''m trying the new 3.2.0. i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: Replace (network-script network-bridge) with (network-script network-bridge-both) in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp The content of network-bridge-both is ************ #!/bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 ************ As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... Now, it doesn''t work anymore... when the xen loads.... there''s only this in the ifconfig command: -lo -peth0 -peth1 What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Jordi Moles wrote:> hi, > > i''m trying the new 3.2.0.In 3.2 the bridge names are replaced as eth0 and eth1 instead of xenbr0 and xenbr1. So you have to change your scripts accordingly --Sadique> > i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: > > Replace > > (network-script network-bridge) > > with > > (network-script network-bridge-both) > > in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp > > The content of network-bridge-both is > > ************ > > #!/bin/sh > dir=$(dirname "$0") > "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 > "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 > > ************ > > As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... > > Now, it doesn''t work anymore... > > when the xen loads.... > > there''s only this in the ifconfig command: > > -lo > -peth0 > -peth1 > > What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi,
i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it.
i replaced my script with this one:
***********
#!/bin/sh
XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
***********
on the other hand....
what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the (vif-script
vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script?
what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this?
****************
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.231
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.2.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
****************
or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian load
the newtork interfaces if i change the name?
Thank you.
En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:> Hi,
>
> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ...
>
> #!/bin/sh
> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
>
> NOTE::
>
> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to
eth<n>.
>
> New method;
> a. rename device eth0 to peth0
> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!)
> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0
>
> !!
>
> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks ..
>
> Gareth.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>
> hi,
>
> i''m trying the new 3.2.0.
>
> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set
up:
>
> Replace
>
> (network-script network-bridge)
>
> with
>
> (network-script network-bridge-both)
>
> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
>
> The content of network-bridge-both is
>
> ************
>
> #!/bin/sh
> dir=$(dirname "$0")
> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0
bridge=xenbr0
> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1
bridge=xenbr1
>
> ************
>
> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases.....
>
> Now, it doesn''t work anymore...
>
> when the xen loads....
>
> there''s only this in the ifconfig command:
>
> -lo
> -peth0
> -peth1
>
> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi again, ... and more importantly... what about the conf files in the virtual machines? something like... vif=[ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] ??????'' thank you. En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:> Hi, > > i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. > > i replaced my script with this one: > > *********** > > #!/bin/sh > XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > > > *********** > > on the other hand.... > > what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the > (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? > > what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? > > **************** > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > gateway 192.168.1.231 > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.2.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > **************** > > or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian load > the newtork interfaces if i change the name? > > Thank you. > > En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... >> >> #!/bin/sh >> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >> >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >> >> NOTE:: >> >> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to >> eth<n>. >> >> New method; >> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 >> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) >> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 >> >> !! >> >> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. >> >> Gareth. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >> >> hi, >> >> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. >> >> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: >> >> Replace >> >> (network-script network-bridge) >> >> with >> >> (network-script network-bridge-both) >> >> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp >> >> The content of network-bridge-both is >> >> ************ >> >> #!/bin/sh >> dir=$(dirname "$0") >> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 >> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 >> >> ************ >> >> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... >> >> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... >> >> when the xen loads.... >> >> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: >> >> -lo >> -peth0 >> -peth1 >> >> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Ok,
/etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen ..
and xen won''t change it.
Here''s my config;
(xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no)
(xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes)
(xend-api-server ((unix)))
(xend-relocation-server yes)
(xend-relocation-port 8002)
(xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'')
(xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''')
(network-script my-network-bridge)
(vif-script vif-bridge)
(dom0-min-mem 196)
(dom0-cpus 0)
(vncpasswd '''')
(xend-http-server yes)
(xend-port 8000)
(xend-address ''<my private ip>'')
(xend-unix-server yes)
(xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket)
Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is
"default".
hth
----- Original Message -----
step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net>
Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
Hi,
i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it.
i replaced my script with this one:
***********
#!/bin/sh
XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
***********
on the other hand....
what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the (vif-script
vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script?
what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this?
****************
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.231
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.2.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
****************
or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian load
the newtork interfaces if i change the name?
Thank you.
En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:> Hi,
>
> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ...
>
> #!/bin/sh
> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
>
> NOTE::
>
> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to
eth<n>.
>
> New method;
> a. rename device eth0 to peth0
> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!)
> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0
>
> !!
>
> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks ..
>
> Gareth.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>
> hi,
>
> i''m trying the new 3.2.0.
>
> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set
up:
>
> Replace
>
> (network-script network-bridge)
>
> with
>
> (network-script network-bridge-both)
>
> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
>
> The content of network-bridge-both is
>
> ************
>
> #!/bin/sh
> dir=$(dirname "$0")
> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0
bridge=xenbr0
> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1
bridge=xenbr1
>
> ************
>
> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases.....
>
> Now, it doesn''t work anymore...
>
> when the xen loads....
>
> there''s only this in the ifconfig command:
>
> -lo
> -peth0
> -peth1
>
> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Ok, Here''s a working VM config; kernel = ''/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.21-prep'' ramdisk = ''/boot/initrd.img-2.6.21-prep'' root = ''/dev/hda1 ro'' disk = [ ''phy:/dev/imagesb/dns1,hda1,w'', ''phy:/dev/swapsb/dns1_swap,hda2,w'' ] vif = [ ''ip=<private IP>,mac=00:00:10:00:00:0A,bridge=eth0'',''ip=<public IP>,mac=00:00:10:00:01:0A,bridge=eth1'' ] on_poweroff = ''destroy'' on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart'' serial_device = ''xvc0'' name = ''dns1'' memory = ''400'' vcpus = ''1'' This one runs over AoE and LVM ... on a host with a private and public interface .. ----- Original Message ----- step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Sent: 20 February 2008 16:15:08 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 Hi again, ... and more importantly... what about the conf files in the virtual machines? something like... vif=[ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] ??????'' thank you. En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:> Hi, > > i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. > > i replaced my script with this one: > > *********** > > #!/bin/sh > XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > > > *********** > > on the other hand.... > > what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the > (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? > > what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? > > **************** > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > gateway 192.168.1.231 > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.2.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > **************** > > or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian load > the newtork interfaces if i change the name? > > Thank you. > > En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... >> >> #!/bin/sh >> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >> >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >> >> NOTE:: >> >> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to >> eth<n>. >> >> New method; >> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 >> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) >> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 >> >> !! >> >> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. >> >> Gareth. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >> >> hi, >> >> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. >> >> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: >> >> Replace >> >> (network-script network-bridge) >> >> with >> >> (network-script network-bridge-both) >> >> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp >> >> The content of network-bridge-both is >> >> ************ >> >> #!/bin/sh >> dir=$(dirname "$0") >> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 >> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 >> >> ************ >> >> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... >> >> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... >> >> when the xen loads.... >> >> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: >> >> -lo >> -peth0 >> -peth1 >> >> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi guys,
let''s see...
i''ve got my own script for bridges:
*******
#!/bin/sh
XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
$XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
*******
this is my interfaces file
*********
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.231
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.2.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
*********
and virtual machines have this in their conf files:
************
vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ]
************
so....
when i try to create the machine... i get this:
**********
Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
**********
Any idea?
Thank you.
En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:> Ok,
>
> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen
.. and xen won''t change it.
>
> Here''s my config;
>
> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no)
> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes)
> (xend-api-server ((unix)))
> (xend-relocation-server yes)
> (xend-relocation-port 8002)
> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'')
> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''')
> (network-script my-network-bridge)
> (vif-script vif-bridge)
> (dom0-min-mem 196)
> (dom0-cpus 0)
> (vncpasswd '''')
> (xend-http-server yes)
> (xend-port 8000)
> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'')
> (xend-unix-server yes)
> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket)
>
> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is
"default".
>
> hth
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net>
> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>
> Hi,
>
> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it.
>
> i replaced my script with this one:
>
> ***********
>
> #!/bin/sh
> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
>
>
> ***********
>
> on the other hand....
>
> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the (vif-script
> vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script?
>
> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this?
>
> ****************
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.200
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.1.0
> broadcast 192.168.1.255
> gateway 192.168.1.231
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.2.200
> netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> ****************
>
> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian load
> the newtork interfaces if i change the name?
>
> Thank you.
>
> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ...
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>>
>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
>>
>> NOTE::
>>
>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n>
to eth<n>.
>>
>> New method;
>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0
>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!)
>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0
>>
>> !!
>>
>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks ..
>>
>> Gareth.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0.
>>
>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following
set up:
>>
>> Replace
>>
>> (network-script network-bridge)
>>
>> with
>>
>> (network-script network-bridge-both)
>>
>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
>>
>> The content of network-bridge-both is
>>
>> ************
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> dir=$(dirname "$0")
>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0
bridge=xenbr0
>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1
bridge=xenbr1
>>
>> ************
>>
>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases.....
>>
>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore...
>>
>> when the xen loads....
>>
>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command:
>>
>> -lo
>> -peth0
>> -peth1
>>
>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, i tried something new.... i read somewhere that the problem now was that i had not installed hotplug on my debian. i did this: ******** # apt-get install hotplug S''està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet S''està construint l''arbre de dependències... Fet Paquets suggerits: ifrename S''ELIMINARAN els següents paquets: initramfs-tools udev S''instal·laran els següents paquets NOUS: hotplug 0 actualitzats, 1 nous a instal·lar, 2 a eliminar i 0 no actualitzats. Es necessita obtenir 67,3kB d''arxius. Després de desempaquetar s''alliberaran 971kB d''espai en disc. Voleu continuar [S/n]? Des:1 http://ftp.rediris.es etch/main hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 [67,3kB] 67,3kB descarregats en 1s (48,9kB/s) S''estan preconfigurant els paquets... (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31229 fitxers i directoris instal·lats actualment.) S''està desinstal·lant initramfs-tools ... S''està desinstal·lant udev ... ************************************************************** * Please reboot your system as soon as possible! * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional. ************************************************************** S''està seleccionant el paquet hotplug prèviament no seleccionat. (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31093 fitxers i directoris instal·lats actualment.) S''està desempaquetant hotplug (de .../hotplug_0.0.20040329-26_all.deb) ... S''està configurant hotplug (0.0.20040329-26) ... x01glus01:/etc/udev/rules.d# ******** The thing is that it removed 2 different paquets, "initramfs-tools" and "udev", which i don''t if xen needs. anyway... after that, i keep getting the same error; ********** Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. ********** any idea? En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:> Hi guys, > > let''s see... > > i''ve got my own script for bridges: > > ******* > #!/bin/sh > XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > ******* > > this is my interfaces file > > ********* > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > gateway 192.168.1.231 > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.2.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > ********* > > and virtual machines have this in their conf files: > > ************ > vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] > ************ > > so.... > > when i try to create the machine... i get this: > > ********** > Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not > working. > ********** > > Any idea? > > Thank you. > > En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> Ok, >> >> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen .. >> and xen won''t change it. >> >> Here''s my config; >> >> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no) >> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes) >> (xend-api-server ((unix))) >> (xend-relocation-server yes) >> (xend-relocation-port 8002) >> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'') >> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''') >> (network-script my-network-bridge) >> (vif-script vif-bridge) >> (dom0-min-mem 196) >> (dom0-cpus 0) >> (vncpasswd '''') >> (xend-http-server yes) >> (xend-port 8000) >> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'') >> (xend-unix-server yes) >> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket) >> >> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is >> "default". >> >> hth >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >> >> Hi, >> >> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. >> >> i replaced my script with this one: >> >> *********** >> >> #!/bin/sh >> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >> >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >> >> >> *********** >> >> on the other hand.... >> >> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the >> (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? >> >> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? >> >> **************** >> auto lo >> iface lo inet loopback >> >> auto eth0 >> iface eth0 inet static >> address 192.168.1.200 >> netmask 255.255.255.0 >> network 192.168.1.0 >> broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> gateway 192.168.1.231 >> >> auto eth1 >> iface eth1 inet static >> address 192.168.2.200 >> netmask 255.255.255.0 >> >> **************** >> >> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian >> load the newtork interfaces if i change the name? >> >> Thank you. >> >> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >>> >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >>> >>> NOTE:: >>> >>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to >>> eth<n>. >>> >>> New method; >>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 >>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) >>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 >>> >>> !! >>> >>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. >>> >>> Gareth. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >>> >>> hi, >>> >>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. >>> >>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: >>> >>> Replace >>> >>> (network-script network-bridge) >>> >>> with >>> >>> (network-script network-bridge-both) >>> >>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp >>> >>> The content of network-bridge-both is >>> >>> ************ >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> dir=$(dirname "$0") >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 >>> >>> ************ >>> >>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... >>> >>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... >>> >>> when the xen loads.... >>> >>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: >>> >>> -lo >>> -peth0 >>> -peth1 >>> >>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Urm, I''ve never tried "not" giving it an IP/MAC in the vif= .. what happens if you add them as per my example? ----- Original Message ----- step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Sent: 20 February 2008 18:11:16 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 Hi, i tried something new.... i read somewhere that the problem now was that i had not installed hotplug on my debian. i did this: ******** # apt-get install hotplug S''està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet S''està construint l''arbre de dependències... Fet Paquets suggerits: ifrename S''ELIMINARAN els següents paquets: initramfs-tools udev S''instal·laran els següents paquets NOUS: hotplug 0 actualitzats, 1 nous a instal·lar, 2 a eliminar i 0 no actualitzats. Es necessita obtenir 67,3kB d''arxius. Després de desempaquetar s''alliberaran 971kB d''espai en disc. Voleu continuar [S/n]? Des:1 http://ftp.rediris.es etch/main hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 [67,3kB] 67,3kB descarregats en 1s (48,9kB/s) S''estan preconfigurant els paquets... (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31229 fitxers i directoris instal·lats actualment.) S''està desinstal·lant initramfs-tools ... S''està desinstal·lant udev ... ************************************************************** * Please reboot your system as soon as possible! * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional. ************************************************************** S''està seleccionant el paquet hotplug prèviament no seleccionat. (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31093 fitxers i directoris instal·lats actualment.) S''està desempaquetant hotplug (de .../hotplug_0.0.20040329-26_all.deb) ... S''està configurant hotplug (0.0.20040329-26) ... x01glus01:/etc/udev/rules.d# ******** The thing is that it removed 2 different paquets, "initramfs-tools" and "udev", which i don''t if xen needs. anyway... after that, i keep getting the same error; ********** Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. ********** any idea? En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:> Hi guys, > > let''s see... > > i''ve got my own script for bridges: > > ******* > #!/bin/sh > XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > ******* > > this is my interfaces file > > ********* > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > gateway 192.168.1.231 > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.2.200 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > ********* > > and virtual machines have this in their conf files: > > ************ > vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] > ************ > > so.... > > when i try to create the machine... i get this: > > ********** > Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not > working. > ********** > > Any idea? > > Thank you. > > En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> Ok, >> >> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen .. >> and xen won''t change it. >> >> Here''s my config; >> >> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no) >> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes) >> (xend-api-server ((unix))) >> (xend-relocation-server yes) >> (xend-relocation-port 8002) >> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'') >> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''') >> (network-script my-network-bridge) >> (vif-script vif-bridge) >> (dom0-min-mem 196) >> (dom0-cpus 0) >> (vncpasswd '''') >> (xend-http-server yes) >> (xend-port 8000) >> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'') >> (xend-unix-server yes) >> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket) >> >> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is >> "default". >> >> hth >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >> >> Hi, >> >> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. >> >> i replaced my script with this one: >> >> *********** >> >> #!/bin/sh >> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >> >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >> >> >> *********** >> >> on the other hand.... >> >> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the >> (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? >> >> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? >> >> **************** >> auto lo >> iface lo inet loopback >> >> auto eth0 >> iface eth0 inet static >> address 192.168.1.200 >> netmask 255.255.255.0 >> network 192.168.1.0 >> broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> gateway 192.168.1.231 >> >> auto eth1 >> iface eth1 inet static >> address 192.168.2.200 >> netmask 255.255.255.0 >> >> **************** >> >> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian >> load the newtork interfaces if i change the name? >> >> Thank you. >> >> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >>> >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >>> >>> NOTE:: >>> >>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to >>> eth<n>. >>> >>> New method; >>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 >>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) >>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 >>> >>> !! >>> >>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. >>> >>> Gareth. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >>> >>> hi, >>> >>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. >>> >>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: >>> >>> Replace >>> >>> (network-script network-bridge) >>> >>> with >>> >>> (network-script network-bridge-both) >>> >>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp >>> >>> The content of network-bridge-both is >>> >>> ************ >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> dir=$(dirname "$0") >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 >>> >>> ************ >>> >>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... >>> >>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... >>> >>> when the xen loads.... >>> >>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: >>> >>> -lo >>> -peth0 >>> -peth1 >>> >>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, the answer is ... the same!! with all the 3.0 and 3.1 releases i''ve always used the bridge this way, without any ip address at all. anyway... i''ve also tried to set the ip address before i perform de "xm create", just in case this had also changed, but it doesn''t work either. i just used your line and put the correct ip addresses in my case, but it just doesn''t work. i''m using debian etch. i''ve tried in a couple of servers, just to check if there was some particular problem with that machine, but found nothing. I''ve used etch to run xen 3.1.x releases for quite a while now, i don''t see why it''s not working now. i''m also using mdadm to build a raid-1 array for xen, to make sure that the virtual machines are always up. I don''t think it has something to do whit it... but i prefer to give all the details so that you can say what it''s wrong with my sytem. thank you. El dc 20 de 02 del 2008 a les 18:34 +0000, en/na Gareth Bult va escriure:> Urm, > > I''ve never tried "not" giving it an IP/MAC in the vif= .. what happens if you add them as per my example? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> > To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Sent: 20 February 2008 18:11:16 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 > > Hi, i tried something new.... > > i read somewhere that the problem now was that i had not installed > hotplug on my debian. > > i did this: > > ******** > > # apt-get install hotplug > S''està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet > S''està construint l''arbre de dependències... Fet > Paquets suggerits: > ifrename > S''ELIMINARAN els següents paquets: > initramfs-tools udev > S''instal·laran els següents paquets NOUS: > hotplug > 0 actualitzats, 1 nous a instal·lar, 2 a eliminar i 0 no actualitzats. > Es necessita obtenir 67,3kB d''arxius. > Després de desempaquetar s''alliberaran 971kB d''espai en disc. > Voleu continuar [S/n]? > Des:1 http://ftp.rediris.es etch/main hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 [67,3kB] > 67,3kB descarregats en 1s (48,9kB/s) > S''estan preconfigurant els paquets... > (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31229 fitxers i directoris > instal·lats actualment.) > S''està desinstal·lant initramfs-tools ... > S''està desinstal·lant udev ... > > ************************************************************** > * Please reboot your system as soon as possible! > * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional. > ************************************************************** > > S''està seleccionant el paquet hotplug prèviament no seleccionat. > (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31093 fitxers i directoris > instal·lats actualment.) > S''està desempaquetant hotplug (de .../hotplug_0.0.20040329-26_all.deb) ... > S''està configurant hotplug (0.0.20040329-26) ... > > x01glus01:/etc/udev/rules.d# > > ******** > > The thing is that it removed 2 different paquets, "initramfs-tools" and > "udev", which i don''t if xen needs. > > anyway... after that, i keep getting the same error; > > ********** > Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. > ********** > > any idea? > > > > > > > > > > > > > En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit: > > Hi guys, > > > > let''s see... > > > > i''ve got my own script for bridges: > > > > ******* > > #!/bin/sh > > XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > > > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > > $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > > ******* > > > > this is my interfaces file > > > > ********* > > auto lo > > iface lo inet loopback > > > > auto eth0 > > iface eth0 inet static > > address 192.168.1.200 > > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > network 192.168.1.0 > > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > gateway 192.168.1.231 > > > > auto eth1 > > iface eth1 inet static > > address 192.168.2.200 > > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > ********* > > > > and virtual machines have this in their conf files: > > > > ************ > > vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] > > ************ > > > > so.... > > > > when i try to create the machine... i get this: > > > > ********** > > Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not > > working. > > ********** > > > > Any idea? > > > > Thank you. > > > > En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: > >> Ok, > >> > >> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen .. > >> and xen won''t change it. > >> > >> Here''s my config; > >> > >> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no) > >> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes) > >> (xend-api-server ((unix))) > >> (xend-relocation-server yes) > >> (xend-relocation-port 8002) > >> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'') > >> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''') > >> (network-script my-network-bridge) > >> (vif-script vif-bridge) > >> (dom0-min-mem 196) > >> (dom0-cpus 0) > >> (vncpasswd '''') > >> (xend-http-server yes) > >> (xend-port 8000) > >> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'') > >> (xend-unix-server yes) > >> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket) > >> > >> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is > >> "default". > >> > >> hth > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> > >> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> > >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London > >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. > >> > >> i replaced my script with this one: > >> > >> *********** > >> > >> #!/bin/sh > >> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > >> > >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > >> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > >> > >> > >> *********** > >> > >> on the other hand.... > >> > >> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the > >> (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? > >> > >> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? > >> > >> **************** > >> auto lo > >> iface lo inet loopback > >> > >> auto eth0 > >> iface eth0 inet static > >> address 192.168.1.200 > >> netmask 255.255.255.0 > >> network 192.168.1.0 > >> broadcast 192.168.1.255 > >> gateway 192.168.1.231 > >> > >> auto eth1 > >> iface eth1 inet static > >> address 192.168.2.200 > >> netmask 255.255.255.0 > >> > >> **************** > >> > >> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian > >> load the newtork interfaces if i change the name? > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... > >>> > >>> #!/bin/sh > >>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" > >>> > >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 > >>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 > >>> > >>> NOTE:: > >>> > >>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> to > >>> eth<n>. > >>> > >>> New method; > >>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 > >>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) > >>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 > >>> > >>> !! > >>> > >>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. > >>> > >>> Gareth. > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> > >>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London > >>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 > >>> > >>> hi, > >>> > >>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. > >>> > >>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: > >>> > >>> Replace > >>> > >>> (network-script network-bridge) > >>> > >>> with > >>> > >>> (network-script network-bridge-both) > >>> > >>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp > >>> > >>> The content of network-bridge-both is > >>> > >>> ************ > >>> > >>> #!/bin/sh > >>> dir=$(dirname "$0") > >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 > >>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 > >>> > >>> ************ > >>> > >>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... > >>> > >>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... > >>> > >>> when the xen loads.... > >>> > >>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: > >>> > >>> -lo > >>> -peth0 > >>> -peth1 > >>> > >>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Xen-users mailing list > >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Xen-users mailing list > >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Xen-users mailing list > >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
hi,
i keep trying until you guys find what the problem is....
i read somewhere that instead of
"vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' , ''bridge=eth1''
]"
i should use something like
"vif0 = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ,
''bridge=eth1'' ]"
the thing is that ifconfig only shows this:
*********
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8E
inet addr:192.168.1.200 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:779 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:501 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:60508 (59.0 KiB) TX bytes:66287 (64.7 KiB)
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8F
inet addr:192.168.2.200 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8f/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8E
inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:991 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:607 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:94602 (92.3 KiB) TX bytes:77779 (75.9 KiB)
Base address:0x2000 Memory:d8020000-d8040000
peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8F
inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8f/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:882 (882.0 b)
Base address:0x2020 Memory:d8060000-d8080000
*********
I''ve tried all the possible ways to get the vifx.x i used to get in
older releases. have they also changed? we don''t get vifxx devices
anymore?
anyway... if try to replace vif with vif0, in the virtual machine, it
actually runs, but gets stuck here:
********
XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0
BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 0 devices found
EDD information not available.
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
EXT2-fs warning (device sda1): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem
as ext2
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 176k freed
Adding 4194296k swap on /dev/sda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4194296k
device-mapper: ioctl: 4.7.0-ioctl (2006-06-24) initialised:
dm-devel@redhat.com
NET: Registered protocol family 10
lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
*********
I guess this is the normal behaviour, because vif0 doesn''t exist at
all... isn''t it?
Thanks.
En/na Jordi Moles Blanco ha escrit:> Hi,
>
> the answer is ... the same!!
>
> with all the 3.0 and 3.1 releases i''ve always used the bridge this
way,
> without any ip address at all.
>
> anyway... i''ve also tried to set the ip address before i perform
de "xm
> create", just in case this had also changed, but it doesn''t
work either.
>
> i just used your line and put the correct ip addresses in my case, but
> it just doesn''t work.
>
> i''m using debian etch. i''ve tried in a couple of servers,
just to check
> if there was some particular problem with that machine, but found
> nothing. I''ve used etch to run xen 3.1.x releases for quite a
while now,
> i don''t see why it''s not working now.
>
> i''m also using mdadm to build a raid-1 array for xen, to make sure
that
> the virtual machines are always up. I don''t think it has something
to do
> whit it... but i prefer to give all the details so that you can say what
> it''s wrong with my sytem.
>
> thank you.
>
>
> El dc 20 de 02 del 2008 a les 18:34 +0000, en/na Gareth Bult va
> escriure:
>
>> Urm,
>>
>> I''ve never tried "not" giving it an IP/MAC in the
vif= .. what happens if you add them as per my example?
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
>> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net>
>> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>> Sent: 20 February 2008 18:11:16 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>>
>> Hi, i tried something new....
>>
>> i read somewhere that the problem now was that i had not installed
>> hotplug on my debian.
>>
>> i did this:
>>
>> ********
>>
>> # apt-get install hotplug
>> S''està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
>> S''està construint l''arbre de dependències... Fet
>> Paquets suggerits:
>> ifrename
>> S''ELIMINARAN els següents paquets:
>> initramfs-tools udev
>> S''instal·laran els següents paquets NOUS:
>> hotplug
>> 0 actualitzats, 1 nous a instal·lar, 2 a eliminar i 0 no actualitzats.
>> Es necessita obtenir 67,3kB d''arxius.
>> Després de desempaquetar s''alliberaran 971kB d''espai
en disc.
>> Voleu continuar [S/n]?
>> Des:1 http://ftp.rediris.es etch/main hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 [67,3kB]
>> 67,3kB descarregats en 1s (48,9kB/s)
>> S''estan preconfigurant els paquets...
>> (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31229 fitxers i
directoris
>> instal·lats actualment.)
>> S''està desinstal·lant initramfs-tools ...
>> S''està desinstal·lant udev ...
>>
>> **************************************************************
>> * Please reboot your system as soon as possible!
>> * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional.
>> **************************************************************
>>
>> S''està seleccionant el paquet hotplug prèviament no
seleccionat.
>> (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31093 fitxers i
directoris
>> instal·lats actualment.)
>> S''està desempaquetant hotplug (de
.../hotplug_0.0.20040329-26_all.deb) ...
>> S''està configurant hotplug (0.0.20040329-26) ...
>>
>> x01glus01:/etc/udev/rules.d#
>>
>> ********
>>
>> The thing is that it removed 2 different paquets,
"initramfs-tools" and
>> "udev", which i don''t if xen needs.
>>
>> anyway... after that, i keep getting the same error;
>>
>> **********
>> Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not
working.
>> **********
>>
>> any idea?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> let''s see...
>>>
>>> i''ve got my own script for bridges:
>>>
>>> *******
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>>>
>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0
vifnum=0
>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1
vifnum=1
>>> *******
>>>
>>> this is my interfaces file
>>>
>>> *********
>>> auto lo
>>> iface lo inet loopback
>>>
>>> auto eth0
>>> iface eth0 inet static
>>> address 192.168.1.200
>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> network 192.168.1.0
>>> broadcast 192.168.1.255
>>> gateway 192.168.1.231
>>>
>>> auto eth1
>>> iface eth1 inet static
>>> address 192.168.2.200
>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> *********
>>>
>>> and virtual machines have this in their conf files:
>>>
>>> ************
>>> vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'',
''bridge=eth1'' ]
>>> ************
>>>
>>> so....
>>>
>>> when i try to create the machine... i get this:
>>>
>>> **********
>>> Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not
>>> working.
>>> **********
>>>
>>> Any idea?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:
>>>
>>>> Ok,
>>>>
>>>> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change
it for xen ..
>>>> and xen won''t change it.
>>>>
>>>> Here''s my config;
>>>>
>>>> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no)
>>>> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes)
>>>> (xend-api-server ((unix)))
>>>> (xend-relocation-server yes)
>>>> (xend-relocation-port 8002)
>>>> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private
ip>'')
>>>> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''')
>>>> (network-script my-network-bridge)
>>>> (vif-script vif-bridge)
>>>> (dom0-min-mem 196)
>>>> (dom0-cpus 0)
>>>> (vncpasswd '''')
>>>> (xend-http-server yes)
>>>> (xend-port 8000)
>>>> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'')
>>>> (xend-unix-server yes)
>>>> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket)
>>>>
>>>> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge",
everything else is
>>>> "default".
>>>>
>>>> hth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
>>>> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net>
>>>> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>>> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT)
Europe/London
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it.
>>>>
>>>> i replaced my script with this one:
>>>>
>>>> ***********
>>>>
>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>>>>
>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0
vifnum=0
>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1
vifnum=1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ***********
>>>>
>>>> on the other hand....
>>>>
>>>> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the
>>>> (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script?
>>>>
>>>> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like
this?
>>>>
>>>> ****************
>>>> auto lo
>>>> iface lo inet loopback
>>>>
>>>> auto eth0
>>>> iface eth0 inet static
>>>> address 192.168.1.200
>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>> network 192.168.1.0
>>>> broadcast 192.168.1.255
>>>> gateway 192.168.1.231
>>>>
>>>> auto eth1
>>>> iface eth1 inet static
>>>> address 192.168.2.200
>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>>
>>>> ****************
>>>>
>>>> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will
debian
>>>> load the newtork interfaces if i change the name?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on
multiple boxes ...
>>>>>
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts"
>>>>>
>>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0
bridge=eth0 vifnum=0
>>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1
bridge=eth1 vifnum=1
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE::
>>>>>
>>>>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from
Xenbr<n> to
>>>>> eth<n>.
>>>>>
>>>>> New method;
>>>>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0
>>>>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!)
>>>>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0
>>>>>
>>>>> !!
>>>>>
>>>>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks ..
>>>>>
>>>>> Gareth.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com>
>>>>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>>>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT)
Europe/London
>>>>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0
>>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the
following set up:
>>>>>
>>>>> Replace
>>>>>
>>>>> (network-script network-bridge)
>>>>>
>>>>> with
>>>>>
>>>>> (network-script network-bridge-both)
>>>>>
>>>>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
>>>>>
>>>>> The content of network-bridge-both is
>>>>>
>>>>> ************
>>>>>
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> dir=$(dirname "$0")
>>>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0
netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0
>>>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1
netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1
>>>>>
>>>>> ************
>>>>>
>>>>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x
releases.....
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore...
>>>>>
>>>>> when the xen loads....
>>>>>
>>>>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command:
>>>>>
>>>>> -lo
>>>>> -peth0
>>>>> -peth1
>>>>>
>>>>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank
you.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, sorry to bother you again :( going through the logs, i just realised one thing: ********* Feb 20 19:06:22 x01glus01 kernel: PM: Adding info for xen-backend:vif-1-0 Feb 20 19:06:22 x01glus01 kernel: PM: Adding info for xen-backend:vif-1-1 Feb 20 19:08:03 x01glus01 kernel: PM: Removing info for xen-backend:vif-1-0 Feb 20 19:08:03 x01glus01 kernel: PM: Removing info for xen-backend:vif-1-1 ********* so.. it looks like it actually sets the vif interfaces when the virtual machine runs, but after a while, xen removes this bridge, so the virtual machine ends up crashing. nothing else is logged. That doesn''t seem so normal to me :( thanks. En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit:> hi, > > i keep trying until you guys find what the problem is.... > > i read somewhere that instead of > "vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' , ''bridge=eth1'' ]" > > i should use something like > > "vif0 = [ ''bridge=eth0'' , ''bridge=eth1'' ]" > > the thing is that ifconfig only shows this: > > ********* > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8E > inet addr:192.168.1.200 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8e/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:779 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:501 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:60508 (59.0 KiB) TX bytes:66287 (64.7 KiB) > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8F > inet addr:192.168.2.200 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8f/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b) > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8E > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8e/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:991 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:607 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:94602 (92.3 KiB) TX bytes:77779 (75.9 KiB) > Base address:0x2000 Memory:d8020000-d8040000 > > peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:7E:9D:8F > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe7e:9d8f/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:882 (882.0 b) > Base address:0x2020 Memory:d8060000-d8080000 > > ********* > > I''ve tried all the possible ways to get the vifx.x i used to get in > older releases. have they also changed? we don''t get vifxx devices > anymore? > > anyway... if try to replace vif with vif0, in the virtual machine, it > actually runs, but gets stuck here: > > ******** > XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0 > BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 0 devices found > EDD information not available. > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. > md: autorun ... > md: ... autorun DONE. > EXT2-fs warning (device sda1): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 > filesystem as ext2 > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. > Freeing unused kernel memory: 176k freed > Adding 4194296k swap on /dev/sda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4194296k > device-mapper: ioctl: 4.7.0-ioctl (2006-06-24) initialised: > dm-devel@redhat.com > NET: Registered protocol family 10 > lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions > IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver > ********* > > I guess this is the normal behaviour, because vif0 doesn''t exist at > all... isn''t it? > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > En/na Jordi Moles Blanco ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> the answer is ... the same!! >> >> with all the 3.0 and 3.1 releases i''ve always used the bridge this way, >> without any ip address at all. >> anyway... i''ve also tried to set the ip address before i perform de "xm >> create", just in case this had also changed, but it doesn''t work either. >> >> i just used your line and put the correct ip addresses in my case, but >> it just doesn''t work. >> >> i''m using debian etch. i''ve tried in a couple of servers, just to check >> if there was some particular problem with that machine, but found >> nothing. I''ve used etch to run xen 3.1.x releases for quite a while now, >> i don''t see why it''s not working now. >> >> i''m also using mdadm to build a raid-1 array for xen, to make sure that >> the virtual machines are always up. I don''t think it has something to do >> whit it... but i prefer to give all the details so that you can say what >> it''s wrong with my sytem. >> >> thank you. >> >> >> El dc 20 de 02 del 2008 a les 18:34 +0000, en/na Gareth Bult va >> escriure: >> >>> Urm, >>> >>> I''ve never tried "not" giving it an IP/MAC in the vif= .. what >>> happens if you add them as per my example? >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >>> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> >>> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> Sent: 20 February 2008 18:11:16 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >>> >>> Hi, i tried something new.... >>> >>> i read somewhere that the problem now was that i had not installed >>> hotplug on my debian. >>> >>> i did this: >>> >>> ******** >>> >>> # apt-get install hotplug >>> S''està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet >>> S''està construint l''arbre de dependències... Fet >>> Paquets suggerits: >>> ifrename >>> S''ELIMINARAN els següents paquets: >>> initramfs-tools udev >>> S''instal·laran els següents paquets NOUS: >>> hotplug >>> 0 actualitzats, 1 nous a instal·lar, 2 a eliminar i 0 no actualitzats. >>> Es necessita obtenir 67,3kB d''arxius. >>> Després de desempaquetar s''alliberaran 971kB d''espai en disc. >>> Voleu continuar [S/n]? >>> Des:1 http://ftp.rediris.es etch/main hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 [67,3kB] >>> 67,3kB descarregats en 1s (48,9kB/s) >>> S''estan preconfigurant els paquets... >>> (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31229 fitxers i >>> directoris instal·lats actualment.) >>> S''està desinstal·lant initramfs-tools ... >>> S''està desinstal·lant udev ... >>> >>> ************************************************************** >>> * Please reboot your system as soon as possible! >>> * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional. >>> ************************************************************** >>> >>> S''està seleccionant el paquet hotplug prèviament no seleccionat. >>> (S''està llegint la base de dades ... hi ha 31093 fitxers i >>> directoris instal·lats actualment.) >>> S''està desempaquetant hotplug (de >>> .../hotplug_0.0.20040329-26_all.deb) ... >>> S''està configurant hotplug (0.0.20040329-26) ... >>> >>> x01glus01:/etc/udev/rules.d# >>> >>> ******** >>> >>> The thing is that it removed 2 different paquets, "initramfs-tools" >>> and "udev", which i don''t if xen needs. >>> >>> anyway... after that, i keep getting the same error; >>> >>> ********** >>> Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not >>> working. >>> ********** >>> >>> any idea? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> En/na Jordi Moles ha escrit: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> let''s see... >>>> >>>> i''ve got my own script for bridges: >>>> >>>> ******* >>>> #!/bin/sh >>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >>>> >>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >>>> ******* >>>> >>>> this is my interfaces file >>>> >>>> ********* >>>> auto lo >>>> iface lo inet loopback >>>> >>>> auto eth0 >>>> iface eth0 inet static >>>> address 192.168.1.200 >>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>> network 192.168.1.0 >>>> broadcast 192.168.1.255 >>>> gateway 192.168.1.231 >>>> >>>> auto eth1 >>>> iface eth1 inet static >>>> address 192.168.2.200 >>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>> ********* >>>> >>>> and virtual machines have this in their conf files: >>>> >>>> ************ >>>> vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'', ''bridge=eth1'' ] >>>> ************ >>>> >>>> so.... >>>> >>>> when i try to create the machine... i get this: >>>> >>>> ********** >>>> Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not >>>> working. >>>> ********** >>>> >>>> Any idea? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >>>> >>>>> Ok, >>>>> >>>>> /etc/network/interfaces - as you like it, don''t change it for xen >>>>> .. and xen won''t change it. >>>>> >>>>> Here''s my config; >>>>> >>>>> (xend-tcp-xmlrpc-server no) >>>>> (xend-unix-xmlrpc-server yes) >>>>> (xend-api-server ((unix))) >>>>> (xend-relocation-server yes) >>>>> (xend-relocation-port 8002) >>>>> (xend-relocation-address ''<my private ip>'') >>>>> (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '''') >>>>> (network-script my-network-bridge) >>>>> (vif-script vif-bridge) >>>>> (dom0-min-mem 196) >>>>> (dom0-cpus 0) >>>>> (vncpasswd '''') >>>>> (xend-http-server yes) >>>>> (xend-port 8000) >>>>> (xend-address ''<my private ip>'') >>>>> (xend-unix-server yes) >>>>> (xend-unix-path /var/lib/xend/xend-socket) >>>>> >>>>> Note; I called my script; "my-network-bridge", everything else is >>>>> "default". >>>>> >>>>> hth >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >>>>> To: "Gareth Bult" <gareth@encryptec.net> >>>>> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>>> Sent: 20 February 2008 16:07:07 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> i''m sorry guys, i don''t quite get it. >>>>> >>>>> i replaced my script with this one: >>>>> >>>>> *********** >>>>> >>>>> #!/bin/sh >>>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >>>>> >>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *********** >>>>> >>>>> on the other hand.... >>>>> >>>>> what about /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp ? Do i have to keep the >>>>> (vif-script vif-bridge) line? Do i have to use another script? >>>>> >>>>> what about /etc/network/interfaces? can i use something like this? >>>>> >>>>> **************** >>>>> auto lo >>>>> iface lo inet loopback >>>>> >>>>> auto eth0 >>>>> iface eth0 inet static >>>>> address 192.168.1.200 >>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>>> network 192.168.1.0 >>>>> broadcast 192.168.1.255 >>>>> gateway 192.168.1.231 >>>>> >>>>> auto eth1 >>>>> iface eth1 inet static >>>>> address 192.168.2.200 >>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>>> >>>>> **************** >>>>> >>>>> or do i have to replace eth0 with peth0 in this file? will debian >>>>> load the newtork interfaces if i change the name? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> En/na Gareth Bult ha escrit: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here''s my Xen3.2 script .. working 100% on multiple boxes ... >>>>>> >>>>>> #!/bin/sh >>>>>> XENDIR="/etc/xen/scripts" >>>>>> >>>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth0 bridge=eth0 vifnum=0 >>>>>> $XENDIR/network-bridge "$@" netdev=eth1 bridge=eth1 vifnum=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTE:: >>>>>> >>>>>> The nice people at Xen changed the default bridge from Xenbr<n> >>>>>> to eth<n>. >>>>>> >>>>>> New method; >>>>>> a. rename device eth0 to peth0 >>>>>> b. create a bridge called eth0 (!!) >>>>>> c. include peth0 as a device for bridge eth0 >>>>>> >>>>>> !! >>>>>> >>>>>> Much improved method, however, the documentation stinks .. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gareth. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> step 3.: "Jordi Moles" <jordi@cdmon.com> >>>>>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> Sent: 20 February 2008 11:50:33 o''clock (GMT) Europe/London >>>>>> Subject: [Xen-users] two bridges with xen 3.2.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> i''m trying the new 3.2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> i''ve always used two bridges since 3.0.x with the following set up: >>>>>> >>>>>> Replace >>>>>> >>>>>> (network-script network-bridge) >>>>>> >>>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>> (network-script network-bridge-both) >>>>>> >>>>>> in file /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp >>>>>> >>>>>> The content of network-bridge-both is >>>>>> >>>>>> ************ >>>>>> >>>>>> #!/bin/sh >>>>>> dir=$(dirname "$0") >>>>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 >>>>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 >>>>>> >>>>>> ************ >>>>>> >>>>>> As i said, this used to work for 3.0.x and 3.1.x releases..... >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, it doesn''t work anymore... >>>>>> >>>>>> when the xen loads.... >>>>>> >>>>>> there''s only this in the ifconfig command: >>>>>> >>>>>> -lo >>>>>> -peth0 >>>>>> -peth1 >>>>>> >>>>>> What''s different from the earlier releases? Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Xen-users mailing list >>>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Xen-users mailing list >>>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Xen-users mailing list >>>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-users mailing list >>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users