Ian Pratt
2005-Oct-25 15:49 UTC
RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0isfromthebridge-utils?
> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge, > > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up. > > kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think > thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing?I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network script rather than using the default. I''m not sure the current network-route script even handles configuration of vif0.0/veth0 devices. It''s only really an issue if you run network services for other VMs in domain0, but its better to have the default of using vif0.0/veth0 incase people do. I was in two minds about the interface renaming, but it proved to be the only way we could get a script working reliably on a wide range of distros, and once you know what''s happening its not too confusing. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Apparently Analagous Threads
- RE: veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridge-utils?
- RE: veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is from thebridge-utils?
- xen 4.1.1 missing veth0 <--> vif0.0 pairs
- xen 4.1.1 missing veth0 <--> vif0.0 pairs
- Bug#550692: Script network-bridge in lenny may break network/firewall configuration