Just so you know, I''ve read the manual :) http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/choosing_deployment.html No php or ssl needed - that is me - simple. So I should be good to go but thought I''d ask. BTW, sorry about the stupid subject. Listening to BNL, you know ;) On 6/27/06, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org <mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote:> Send Mongrel-users mailing list submissions to > mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > mongrel-users-owner at rubyforge.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mongrel-users digest..." > > > Today''s Topics: > > 1. Re: mongrel start oddities (Zed Shaw) > 2. Bare naked server (paul.vudmaska at gmail.com) > 3. Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Luis Lavena) > 4. Re: Bare naked server (James Moore) > 5. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Zed Shaw) > 6. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Metin Amiroff) > 7. Re: Bare naked server (paul.vudmaska at gmail.com) > 8. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Berger, Daniel) > 9. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Marcus Rueckert) > 10. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Luis Lavena) > 11. Re: Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. (Luis Lavena) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:27:38 -0400 > From: Zed Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] mongrel start oddities > To: doug at dougselph.com, mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <1151364458.6118.13.camel at localhost.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:56 +0000, Doug Selph wrote: > > I am running mongrel-0.3.13.1. Have used lighty and fcgi in the past, > > and I must say that apache-2.0.x proxying to mongrel is much nicer to > > deal with! I am having this problem, however. > > > <snip> > > However, if I am in the same location and issue this command (when no > > mongrel is running, obviously): > > > > --------- > > mongrel_rails start -C /etc/mongrel/mongrel_myapp.conf > > --------- > > Hey Doug, that''s something I have to change soon. For now just specify > the full path to the log and pid file manually and the problem will go > away. > > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > http://www.zedshaw.com/ > http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:24:28 -0500 > From: paul.vudmaska at gmail.com > Subject: [Mongrel] Bare naked server > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <ca7669e70606270824y4eca666bjbd210bcbccc1fd70 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Thanks, Zed, for mongrel :!) > > I''ve been on TextDrive for some time running my sites behind apache > w/lighttpd. Once it got running it was cool enough. When it ran. And > there was still the webmin dance and all. > > So I decided to set things up on my little dedicated redhat server - > since I''d had so much success locally w/mongrel. Fast. Simple. It has > been great and I managed to move all my sites into it and off TD. > Smooth as glass thus far. So, I decided I did not need no stinking > apache ;-) > > Zed said : > >Mongrel was > >specifically designed to be run as a non-privileged user on a higher > >port in order to avoid these kinds of things. In reality if you''re > >running Mongrel you should put it behind another web server and let that > >web server defend port 80 for you. > > Doh. My understanding was that running a server in front of apache was > primarily because apache(other) was good/better at serving static > files. But since my performance thus far has been good(much faster now > than apache/mod_ruby) I''ve not sweat it.(thinking in the future I''d > serve images from another server if nec.) > > Are there other reasons, besides load, that I might be stupid for > leaving mongrel running bare on port 80? Are the mongrel police going > to come get me? > > I did have one interesting error that was being thrown because I was > unable to grab the host name for a request. For some reason > http:///w00tw00t.at.ISC.SANS.DFind: was landing on my port. I''m > sending :status => 404 now(rather than dieing, which is caught by > exception notifier) Are these the type of things I should be worried > about? > > http://www.atlink.it/~conti/2006/03/04/w00tw00tatiscsansdfind-update/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:02:03 -0300 > From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena at gmail.com> > Subject: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <71166b3b0606271002p622cbc2bkb45e22b2644f5acd at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough? > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475 > > Add "automatic" mongrel support to script/server > > Status: closed, commited in rev #4486. > > That is good news, right? > > Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-) > > -- > Luis Lavena > Multimedia systems > - > Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, > which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that > is worthwhile. > Vince Lombardi > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:02:21 -0700 > From: "James Moore" <banshee at banshee.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Bare naked server > To: <paul at vudmaska.com>, <mongrel-users at rubyforge.org> > Message-ID: <01e501c69a13$d639b4c0$6401a8c0 at BansheeSoftware.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Multiple incoming requests? Mongrel (or, more specifically, Rails itself) > can only handle a single request at a time, right? > > - James Moore > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:08:37 -0400 > From: Zed Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <1151431717.7791.37.camel at localhost.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:02 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote: > > Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough? > > > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475 > > > > Add "automatic" mongrel support to script/server > > > > Status: closed, commited in rev #4486. > > > > That is good news, right? > > > > Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-) > > > > Yeah man, it''s very cool. If people have mongrel installed then they > can do script/server mongrel and it''ll start right up. Should make lots > of folks happy. > > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > http://www.zedshaw.com/ > http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:14:29 +0300 > From: "Metin Amiroff" <amiroff at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <9328906b0606271114l7d053007vc3f792053dec5b43 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR application > server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > Now, _that_ would make even more folks happy... > > On 6/27/06, Zed Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:02 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote: > > > Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough? > > > > > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475 > > > > > > Add "automatic" mongrel support to script/server > > > > > > Status: closed, commited in rev #4486. > > > > > > That is good news, right? > > > > > > Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-) > > > > > > > Yeah man, it''s very cool. If people have mongrel installed then they > > can do script/server mongrel and it''ll start right up. Should make lots > > of folks happy. > > > > > > -- > > Zed A. Shaw > > http://www.zedshaw.com/ > > http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mongrel-users mailing list > > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > > > > > > -- > Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pok?j Fri?ur Fred B?ke > Hasiti Lap? Hetep Malu M?? Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch > Shanti Vrede Bar?? R?j M?r Taika Rongo S?lh Py''guapy > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20060627/95100586/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:36:45 -0500 > From: paul.vudmaska at gmail.com > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Bare naked server > To: "James Moore" <banshee at banshee.com>, mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <ca7669e70606271136l59f7f80ue16c083abc159599 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hmm, I did not know - that would be a good reason :) So, apache, > lighty and all divvy up the requests so mongrel does not have to? > > On TD, I figured we were using apache/lighty so multiple ports could > be used - and therefor use a shared ip, with a lot of instances of > lighty(which I was thinking played a role in the server dying so > much). I thought that was the main reason. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:04:53 -0500 > From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger at qwest.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: <mongrel-users at rubyforge.org> > Message-ID: > <39AA6550E5AA554AB1456707D6E5563D0259E6E9 at QTOMAE2K3M01.AD.QINTRA.COM> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > >To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > dunno that they want to do that. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or > privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication > in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the communication and any attachments. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:09:21 +0200 > From: Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert at suse.de> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <20060627190921.GH5504 at suse.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On 2006-06-27 14:04:53 -0500, Berger, Daniel wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > > >To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > > dunno that they want to do that. > > why? > lighttpd isnt an hard requirement and preferred if found aswell. > so you could do the same with mongrel. > > a simple: > > begin > require "mongrel" > rescue > > should do it no?:) > > darix > > -- > openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux > openSUSE is good for you > www.opensuse.org > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:13:42 -0300 > From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <71166b3b0606271213u7fc7e483y337433ecb3410280 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 6/27/06, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger at qwest.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > > >To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > > dunno that they want to do that. > > > > Actually if mongrel is installed, will run with it, if not, will > default to webrick (like was doing with lighty, now plus mongrel). Is > up to the developer to install mongrel or not, anyway your rails > applications will work. > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4486 > > > -- > Luis Lavena > Multimedia systems > - > Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, > which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that > is worthwhile. > Vince Lombardi > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:15:11 -0300 > From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <71166b3b0606271215r671e4195o650364db8510ed58 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 6/27/06, Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert at suse.de> wrote: > > On 2006-06-27 14:04:53 -0500, Berger, Daniel wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org > > > [mailto:mongrel-users-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff > > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > > > >To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > > > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > > > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > > > > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > > > dunno that they want to do that. > > > > why? > > lighttpd isnt an hard requirement and preferred if found aswell. > > so you could do the same with mongrel. > > > > a simple: > > > > begin > > require "mongrel" > > rescue > > > > should do it no?:) > > > > yeah, it does: > > http://rails.techno-weenie.net/question/2006/6/23/starting-mongrel-with-script-server > > I replaced my script/server with the one I proposed on that page, long time ago. > > -- > Luis Lavena > Multimedia systems > - > Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, > which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that > is worthwhile. > Vince Lombardi > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > > End of Mongrel-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17 > ******************************************** >