Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "enoguh".
Did you mean:
enogh
2006 Jun 27
9
Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core.
Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough?
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475
Add "automatic" mongrel support to script/server
Status: closed, commited in rev #4486.
That is good news, right?
Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-)
--
Luis Lavena
Multimedia systems
-
Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort,
which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that
is worthwhile.
Vince Lombardi
2006 Jun 27
0
using mongrel on port 80
...lowed
>
> Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough?
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475
>
> Add "automatic" mongrel support to script/server
>
> Status: closed, commited in rev #4486.
>
> That is good news, right?
>
> Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-)
>
> --
> Luis Lavena
> Multimedia systems
> -
> Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort,
> which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that
> is worthwhile.
> Vince Lombardi
>
>
> --------------------...
2004 Aug 06
2
Quick Question.
How can you have an intro play prior to it
going in the stream ala Live 365?
Any suggestions would be great!
AJ
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
2004 Aug 06
0
ads/inserts (was: Quick Question.)
...nyway to do it with icecast') semiregular ads/news itesm/bulletins into
an otto playlist?
even something as simple as cronning an insert of a news item into the
playlist every 30 minutes, so that when the current song ended, the news
would happen...?
or, more generally, does anyone undertsand enoguh of the inner workings
of otto to tell me how to script, from outside the web interface,
requests into the stream?
thx
orry for rambling...
"AJones!" wrote:
>
> How can you have an intro play prior to it
> going in the stream ala Live 365?
>
> Any suggestions would be g...
2013 Nov 14
3
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
...subsequent iterations much easier to test and show are
correct. I think it would also allow significantly more precise regression
testing in the future.
This also isn't the first time I've wanted it in LLVM and in Clang. It's
just the first time I've been working on something large enoguh to feel
like importing it would be worth the cost.
My feeling is that both gtest and gmock suffer from the same flaw: they can
easily be overused or misused in circumstances where there are clearly
better ways to go about things. However, I feel like within LLVM we have
been really good at pushing...
2003 Jun 03
2
tftp problems with VIA EPIA-M board
I'm trying to boot linux on a VIA EPIA-M board (a Nehemiah-based
M10000), and I'm having some trouble with it. I'm watching the network
transactions with ethereal, and I'm seeing a failure at what appears
to be the tftp stage.
The M10000 picks up its IP address from the dhcp server (ISC
DHCP3), and reports it correctly on the screen. Then the tftp session
starts, and I get the
2011 Oct 07
4
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
...a
> preprocessor.
I think we can do it without completely rewriting the parser.
> [Why NOT while-loop?]
> * A while-loop requires evaluating an loop-condition expression; this
> is complexity that I would like to avoid.
I agree. It's not needed. Simple iteration over a list is enoguh.
> [Why NO if-else?]
> * It requires at least evaluating a Boolean expression, too.
> * If a piece of td codes is complicated enough that we need an if-else
> to eliminate its duplication, I think it is worthy of the duplication.
Perhaps. I'm sort of on the fence on this. I don&...
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and will
2013 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
...iterations much easier to test and show are correct. I think it would also allow significantly more precise regression testing in the future.
>
> This also isn't the first time I've wanted it in LLVM and in Clang. It's just the first time I've been working on something large enoguh to feel like importing it would be worth the cost.
It is always worth reevaluating.
> My feeling is that both gtest and gmock suffer from the same flaw: they can easily be overused or misused in circumstances where there are clearly better ways to go about things. However, I feel like within L...
2011 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
...ink we can do it without completely rewriting the parser.
>
>> [Why NOT while-loop?]
>> * A while-loop requires evaluating an loop-condition expression; this
>> is complexity that I would like to avoid.
>
> I agree. It's not needed. Simple iteration over a list is enoguh.
>
>> [Why NO if-else?]
>> * It requires at least evaluating a Boolean expression, too.
>> * If a piece of td codes is complicated enough that we need an if-else
>> to eliminate its duplication, I think it is worthy of the duplication.
>
> Perhaps. I'm sort o...
2011 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
...think we can do it without completely rewriting the parser.
>
>> [Why NOT while-loop?]
>> * A while-loop requires evaluating an loop-condition expression; this
>> is complexity that I would like to avoid.
>
> I agree. It's not needed. Simple iteration over a list is enoguh.
>
>> [Why NO if-else?]
>> * It requires at least evaluating a Boolean expression, too.
>> * If a piece of td codes is complicated enough that we need an if-else
>> to eliminate its duplication, I think it is worthy of the duplication.
>
> Perhaps. I'm sort of...
2013 Nov 13
7
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will
allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier
to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in
GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and
will allow more careful testing of C++ APIs where the interesting part is
the API itself.
2020 Jul 14
2
Multiple documents in one test file
On 14/07/2020 03:27, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote:
> (+Richard - it's handy to include folks from previous discussions
> explicitly so everyone can more easily keep track of the conversation)
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:17 PM Fangrui Song via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
> Sometimes it is
2011 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
My purpose is to eliminate copy-paste style of programming in td files
as much as possible, but only to a point that the new language
constructs do not create too much overhead/readability-downgrade.
In other words, I am targeting those low-hanging fruit of copy-paste
programmings in td files that are eliminated by a simple for-loop
syntax. The repetitive patterns I observed in PTX backend (and
2013 Mar 12
10
[RFC] CCing MAINTAINERS on patches by default?
With the numbers of patches flying around it can be a bit hard for a
maintainer to spot patches which (s)he is expected to comment on / deal
with, especially now that we have a larger number of maintainers of
varying subsystems etc.
I think it might be time to start asking patch submitters to CC the
maintainers of the code they are touching, based on the MAINTAINERS
file.
If people (specifically
2011 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:42 PM, David A. Greene wrote:
> Jakob Stoklund Olesen <jolesen at apple.com> writes:
>
>> On Oct 6, 2011, at 7:59 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
>>
>>> For example, I want to be able to do this:
>>>
>>> defm MOVH :
>>> vs1x_fps_binary_vv_node_rmonly<
>>> 0x16, "movh", undef, 0,
>>>
2007 Jul 30
0
10 commits - libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c libswfdec/swfdec_as_super.c libswfdec/swfdec_video_movie_as.c test/trace
...ml \
registerclass-previous.c \
registerclass-previous.swf \
registerclass-previous.swf.trace \
diff-tree 6f76b7e91fa0d0ea68a56cddcc8a416419b48945 (from 63d07e3882ee47cffd2a69b1c1e84b22fc52c64d)
Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org>
Date: Mon Jul 30 14:53:36 2007 +0200
if not enoguh registers are available, push undefined
diff --git a/libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c b/libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c
index 4802133..ecc828a 100644
--- a/libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c
+++ b/libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c
@@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ swfdec_action_push (SwfdecAsContext *cx,
guint r...
2007 Aug 03
0
Changes to 'refs/tags/0.5.1'
...s
when calling super() we're still constructing
switch argument handling to use SwfdecAsStackIterator
create arguments variable using a SwfdecAsStackIterator
fix typo
add test for argument preloading in registers
use the right number of registers
if not enoguh registers are available, push undefined
add a test for how registers are handled
reorganize swfdec_as_frame_preload() order to match tests
add tests for swfdec_as_frame_preload order
allow running scripts in NEW state
run initialization scripts in NEW state
ignor...
2013 Mar 25
86
[PATCH 00/28] libxl: ocaml: improve the bindings
The following series of patches fill in most of the gaps in the OCaml bindings
to libxl, to make them useful for clients such as xapi/xenopsd (from XCP).
There are a number of bugfixes to the existing bindings as well. I have an
experimental version of xenopsd that successfully uses the new bindings.
An earlier version of the first half of the series was submitted to the last
by Ian Campbell on