Jason Wang
2023-Mar-22 02:36 UTC
[PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 5:00?PM Albert Huang <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote:> > From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> > > fix commit 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb") > > if we disable the napi_tx. when we triger a tx interrupt, thetypo should be "trigger"> vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be > set to false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed > or virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare > > if we disable the napi_tx, It will only be called when the tx ring > buffer is relatively small: > virtio_net->start_xmit: > if (sq->vq->num_free < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { > netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum); > if (!use_napi && > unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) { > /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */ > free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, false); > if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { > netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum); > virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq); > }The code example here is out of date, make sure your tree has this: commit d71ebe8114b4bf622804b810f5e274069060a174 Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Tue Jan 17 11:47:07 2023 +0800 virtio-net: correctly enable callback during start_xmit> } > } > Because event_triggered is true.Therefore, VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or > VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE will not be set.So we update > vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap > every time we call virtqueue_get_buf_ctx.This will bring more interruptions.Can you please post how to test with the performance numbers?> > if event_triggered is set to true, do not update vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) > or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap > > Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index 307e139cb11d..f486cccadbeb 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -795,7 +795,8 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, > /* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host > * by writing event index and flush out the write before > * the read in the next get_buf call. */ > - if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) > + if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT) > + && (vq->event_triggered == false))I'm not sure this can work, when event_triggered is true it means we've got an interrupt, in this case if we want another interrupt for the next entry, we should update used_event otherwise we will lose that interrupt? Thanks> virtio_store_mb(vq->weak_barriers, > &vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring), > cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx)); > @@ -1529,7 +1530,8 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq, > * by writing event index and flush out the write before > * the read in the next get_buf call. > */ > - if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow == VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DESC) > + if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow == VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DESC > + && (vq->event_triggered == false)) > virtio_store_mb(vq->weak_barriers, > &vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap, > cpu_to_le16(vq->last_used_idx)); > -- > 2.31.1 >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
- [External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
- [PATCH v2] virtio_ring: don't update event idx on get_buf
- 9p regression (Was: [PATCH v2] virtio_ring: don't update event idx on get_buf)
- [PATCH v3 3/4] virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb