Hi, R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R packages that need to be rebuilt: R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance! [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager -- I?aki ?car
I'm on it. Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:> Hi, > > R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R > packages that need to be rebuilt: > > R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 > R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 > R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 > R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 > R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 > R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 > R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 > R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 > R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 > > Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and > rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance! > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5 > [2] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager > > -- > I?aki ?car > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
These should all be finished now. Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:05 AM Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote:> I'm on it. > > Thanks, > Tom > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R >> packages that need to be rebuilt: >> >> R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 >> R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 >> R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 >> R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 >> R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 >> R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 >> R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 >> R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 >> R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 >> >> Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and >> rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance! >> >> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5 >> [2] >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager >> >> -- >> I?aki ?car >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >> >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Hi I?aki, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 08:24, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R > packages that need to be rebuilt: > > ...I noticed that R-sfsmisc is failing on koschei, and it appears to be related to this BLAS change: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8692462 Any ideas here?> > Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and > rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance! > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5 > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager > > -- > I?aki ?car >-- Elliott
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 08:47, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi I?aki, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 08:24, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R > > packages that need to be rebuilt: > > > > ... > > I noticed that R-sfsmisc is failing on koschei, and it appears to be > related to this BLAS change: > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8692462 > > Any ideas here?It seems like a poorly designed test to me, because it requires a narrow number of iterations (27:28) to pass. It appears to fail only in i686 (maybe other 32-bit architectures too?) with the new BLAS default (which FlexiBLAS sets to openblas-openmp). It would be interesting to see how many iterations actually took (less or more than 27:28?; I doubt it, but maybe there's some bug in openblas-openmp?). Anyway, these tests were most probably set using the reference BLAS implementation, so you can just export FLEXIBLAS=netlib in the %check section, which solves the issue in that platform: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49072314 -- I?aki ?car