search for: provenpackag

...lse who wished to try to do so. > > Note that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > update like this. Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. -- I?aki ?car

...: R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance! [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager -- I?aki ?car

...te that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive >> > update like this. >> >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. >> >> -- >> I?aki ?car >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora -- I?aki ?car

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I know but time flies). I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...o use a side tag > > >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > > >> > update like this. > > >> > > >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily > > >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> I?aki ?car > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailm...

...allaway wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > Tom > > What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? > > I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I > know but time flies). > > I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Great, thanks! :) Basically, we need (correct me if I'm wrong, Tom): 1) A new user side tag. 2) For R, merge master in F32 and send a build to that side tag. 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the release version and send buil...

...needed. It is possible to use a side tag > >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > >> > update like this. > >> > >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily > >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. > >> > >> -- > >> I?aki ?car > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > >...

...; > >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > > > >> > update like this. > > > >> > > > >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily > > > >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> I?aki ?car > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > > >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > >...

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably