Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "provenpackager".
2020 Jun 23
3
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...lse who wished to try to do so.
>
> Note that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag
> for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive
> update like this.
Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily
volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager.
--
I?aki ?car
2020 Aug 10
4
Rebuild against FlexiBLAS
...:
R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64
R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64
R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64
R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64
R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64
R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64
R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64
R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64
R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64
Could somebody with provenpackager superpowers bump the release and
rebuild them, please? Thanks in advance!
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/pull-request/5
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager
--
I?aki ?car
2020 Jun 23
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...te that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag
>> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive
>> > update like this.
>>
>> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily
>> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager.
>>
>> --
>> I?aki ?car
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
--
I?aki ?car
2020 Jun 23
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> At this point, I simply don't have the time.
>
> Tom
What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined?
I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I
know but time flies).
I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process.
Regards,
--
Jos? Ab?lio
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2020 Jun 24
8
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...o use a side tag
> > >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive
> > >> > update like this.
> > >>
> > >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily
> > >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> I?aki ?car
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
> > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman...
2020 Jun 23
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...allaway wrote:
> > At this point, I simply don't have the time.
> >
> > Tom
>
> What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined?
>
> I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I
> know but time flies).
>
> I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process.
Great, thanks! :) Basically, we need (correct me if I'm wrong, Tom):
1) A new user side tag.
2) For R, merge master in F32 and send a build to that side tag.
3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the
release version and send builds...
2020 Jun 24
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...needed. It is possible to use a side tag
> >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive
> >> > update like this.
> >>
> >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily
> >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager.
> >>
> >> --
> >> I?aki ?car
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>
>
>
&g...
2020 Jun 24
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...; > >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive
> > > >> > update like this.
> > > >>
> > > >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily
> > > >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> I?aki ?car
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > > >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
> > &g...
2020 Jun 09
5
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora
R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With
the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and
R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest
versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora
infrastructure is working reliably