Rowland penny
2016-Jul-28 08:12 UTC
[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote:> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict > requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate > responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the > fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. > Cheers - Michael >This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one computer ? Microsoft recognised this and produced SBS, there are entire Linux distro's being built around this idea (Clearos, SME), are they doing wrong, or should the wiki now reflect this reality ? What would help is if winbindd on the DC could be made to work more like it does on a domain member i.e. allow setting of ranges Rowland
Reindl Harald
2016-Jul-28 08:29 UTC
[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny:> On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote: >> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict >> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate >> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the >> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. >> Cheers - Michael > > This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one > computer?then you setup a virtual machine which many people do in general for every service -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160728/84ece099/signature.sig>
Rowland penny
2016-Jul-28 08:34 UTC
[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
On 28/07/16 09:29, Reindl Harald wrote:> > > Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny: >> >> This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one >> computer? > > then you setup a virtual machine which many people do in general for > every service > >But what if you don't want to setup a VM ? Rowland
mathias dufresne
2016-Jul-28 09:23 UTC
[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
2016-07-28 10:29 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:> > > Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny: > >> On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote: >> >>> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict >>> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate >>> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the >>> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. >>> Cheers - Michael >>> >> >> This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one >> computer? >> > > then you setup a virtual machine which many people do in general for every > service >+1 :D> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >