On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:> There's the unstable version that installs and works: > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? Peter
Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: > > There's the unstable version that installs and works: > > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer > GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand?Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer libstdc++). Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20171120/6d87d705/attachment-0001.sig>
milos.blazevic
2017-Nov-20 13:21 UTC
[CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
Quoting Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org>:> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer > GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? >Judging by the comments in the original announcement: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_linux-skype_startms-skype_installms/the-new-skype-for-desktop-is-here/dba5e41b-126a-4221-9e28-e1266d235689?auth=1 I'd say yes. Sadly, no one from M$/Skype team bothered to point us in the right direction.> > Peter > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 21/11/17 02:21, milos.blazevic wrote:> Judging by the comments in the original announcement: > https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_linux-skype_startms-skype_installms/the-new-skype-for-desktop-is-here/dba5e41b-126a-4221-9e28-e1266d235689?auth=1 > I'd say yes. > > Sadly, no one from M$/Skype team bothered to point us in the right > direction.I'm impressed that they listened at all. Peter
Mark LaPierre
2017-Nov-21 01:13 UTC
[CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:> Hello, > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > >> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >>> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ >> >> Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer >> GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? > > Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single > binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't > use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer > libstdc++). > >Please explain "Unpacking the RPM". How is one to do that when there are broken dependencies? -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ **** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20171120/74f0619f/attachment-0001.sig>