Les Mikesell
2015-Apr-27 16:52 UTC
[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:> > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. >> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy: > > http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssueIt is really the GPL that has the restriction preventing 'best-of-breed' components being combined, but it doesn't matter, it isn't going to change. I can see Sun being irritated with Linux (and for good reason...) but isn't it time to let it go? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Joerg Schilling
2015-Apr-27 17:10 UTC
[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. > >> > >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy: > > > > http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue > > It is really the GPL that has the restriction preventing > 'best-of-breed' components being combined, but it doesn't matter, it > isn't going to change. I can see Sun being irritated with Linux > (and for good reason...) but isn't it time to let it go?We had much less problems is the people that use the GPL would understand the GPL. If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of course. J?rg -- EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
Les Mikesell
2015-Apr-27 17:36 UTC
[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:> > > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the > GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of > course.Which countries' copyright laws would permit that explicitly even when some of the components' licenses prohibit it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Maybe Matching Threads
- Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts