Displaying 20 results from an estimated 186 matches for "schill".
Did you mean:
schily
2009 Jun 08
14
script help - '3rd last field'
Hi
I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
5 or 6 fields long, e.g
foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala
foor.bar.gigi.VALUE.baz.lala
I need to find VALUE - if this were python or something i could do it
but this has to be in shell -
Any clues?
thanks
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
> >> license, or BSD-old:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
> >
> > Do you like to disc...
2008 Feb 21
37
Preferred backup s/w
Hi all,
What is the current preferred method for backing up ZFS data pools,
preferably using free ($0.00) software, and assuming that access to
individual files (a la ufsbackup/ufsrestore) is required?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > > >
> >> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.
> >>
> >> OK, great. That clears it up then.
> >
> > Maybe this helps:
> >
> >...
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > >
> > I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my
> > portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
> >
>
> Not sure why it matters with a standalone application l...
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > > >
> >> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
> >>
> >> The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
> >> dual license to...
2005 Nov 25
28
ZFS and memcntl(..., MC_SYNC, ...)
It wouldn''t be proper to start my first post here without congratulations
and thanks to the ZFS team for such an impressive piece of work.
Anyway, on to my query. I''ve been trying out ZFS, with a particular focus in
reducing latency in a specific application. This application has a fair
amount of random writing going on in the background (which, of course, ZFS
will make
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been
> > added with Svr4:
>
> Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?
>
> http://heirloom.sourc...
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where
> additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did
> never tr...
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...was just
8-bit clean.
- job-control. If you do not call "jsh", or if you switch off jobcontrol
via "set +m" in a job shell, you have the job-control related builtins
but there is no processgroup management.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
2013 Aug 17
6
k3b -> cddb doesn't work
Copying a CD with k3b is no problem, except I want to include on my copy
the cbbd data (from freedb.org). I've configured k3b's cddb section
according to instructions at <http://www.freedb.org/en/faq.3.html#15>
and read every article google could find about "k3b cddb freedb.org
config", but still k3b can't manage it. Grip handles getting the cddb
data just fine.
2015 Apr 28
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as
> > this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL
> > in order to make the whole be under GPL.
>
> The GPL doesn't require that you relicense a...
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...s
this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL
in order to make the whole be under GPL.
In other words, if you can legally combine BSD code with GPL code, you can do
with GPL and CDDL as well.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the
> GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of
> course.
Which countries' copyright laws...
2015 Jun 01
5
Native ZFS on Linux
Once upon a time, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> said:
> Note that it is without doubt that ZFS was not derived from the Linux kernel
> and thus cannot be a derived work.
All that matters for CentOS is:
1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation...
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > >
> > And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code
> > freely combinable with other OSS.
>
> Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad you recognize that. It's
> whole po...
2019 Jul 22
2
Fwd: Character not allowed in mailbox name
...> Limited. U.K. Co. No. 08836288
>
> The contents of this e-mail are confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient you are to delete this e-mail immediately, disregard
> its contents and disclose them to no other persons.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lothar Schilling via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> Reply-To: Lothar Schilling <ls at proasyl.de>
> To: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Subject: Character not allowed in mailbox name
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:33:45 +0200
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> after an update this morning to dov...
2015 Apr 27
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
>> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> > >
>> > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective
w...
2003 Jun 13
5
cvsup with tag=. on src and upgrading (in general)
...Did I do something wrong with the cvsup file?
Next question has to do with upgrading. I have 4.6 src installed, but
I cvsup'd RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE. Does jumping several
releases/sub-releases like that cause problems? Or, in other words, is
it wiser to do incremental upgrades?
--Richard Schilling
2015 Jun 01
2
Native ZFS on Linux
On 06/01/2015 06:42 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote:
>
>> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is
>> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the
>> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue,...