search for: gpld

...39;s > whole point is the restriction against linking with anything with an > incompatible license which obviously prevents a lot of best-of-breed > combinations. You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not forbid this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked against any library under and license. If this was not thecase, you could not legally distribute binaries from GPLd programs. > > My code is fully legal and there is absolutely no license problem with it. > > Umm, no. Larry Wall clearly understood this eons ago...

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not forbid > this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked > against any library under and license. If this was not thecase, you could not > legally distribute binaries from GPLd programs. You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between...

...at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not forbid > > this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked > > against any library under and license. If this was not thecase, you could not > > legally distribute binaries from GPLd programs. > > You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is > covered by the GPL. There can't...

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the > GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of > course. Which countries' copyright laws would permit that explicitly even when some of the

...from uninformed people. If you did read the CDDL, you did of course know that the CDDL places "work limits" at file limits and that the CDDL does not try to impose any restriction on sources that are not in a file marked as CDDLd. So the CDDL of course does create any restriction on a GPLd work. On the other side, the GPL does create restrictions on other sources, but it just requires other sources (if needed to recreate the shipped binary) to be shipped together with the GPLd work. The GPL of course does not impose any further restrictions on _other_ sources under a different li...

...u think the GPL doesn't pose a problem with combining components? More to the point, why don't you eliminate any question about that problem with a dual license on the code you control? > - Non-GPL code used in a colective work was implemented independently > from the GPLd parts and form a separate work that may be used without > the GPLd code as well. How 'you' arrange them isn't the point. Or even any individual who builds something that isn't intended for redistribution. But for other people to consider them generally usable as compo...

...ell, modify) as long as you include the source code, the License and make any changes you make available in the same manner to all others. My questions is this: If I develop an external application (say a Call Center application or a GUI management application) that uses Asterisk data is that also GPLd? I understand if I add code to Asterisk, but what about external interfaces? Where is the seperation here of the Cathedral and the Bazaar? Thanks -- Costas Menico Meezon Software Corp 201-224-8111 costas@meezon.com --

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >> >> You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is >> covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between binary and >> source since one is derived from the other. > > Now you just need to understand what "as a whole" means.... Apparently we live in different u...

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my > > portability attempts seem to be widely unknown. > > > > Not sure why it matters with a standalone

...x match these rules - well, I assume that the ZFS integration code follows the rules that are needed for a clean collective work. Cdrtools follow these rules: - No code from CDDL and GPL is mixed into a single file - Non-GPL code used in a colective work was implemented independently from the GPLd parts and form a separate work that may be used without the GPLd code as well. J?rg -- EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ ht...

...te any question about that > problem with a dual license on the code you control? ??? I completely follow the claims from both licenses, so there is no need to follow your wishes. > > - Non-GPL code used in a colective work was implemented independently > > from the GPLd parts and form a separate work that may be used without > > the GPLd code as well. > > How 'you' arrange them isn't the point. Or even any individual who > builds something that isn't intended for redistribution. But for > other people to consider them g...

...enses, so there is no need to > follow your wishes. Unless, of course, you actually wanted the code to be used by others or included as components of best-of-breed projects. >> > - Non-GPL code used in a colective work was implemented independently >> > from the GPLd parts and form a separate work that may be used without >> > the GPLd code as well. >> >> How 'you' arrange them isn't the point. Or even any individual who >> builds something that isn't intended for redistribution. But for >> other peopl...

Hello, I believe that ZFS and it''s concepts is truly revolutionary to the point that I no longer see any OS as modern if it does not have comparable storage functionality. Therefore I think that file system/disk manager with similar qualities should be written for Linux. Does Sun have plans to dual license ZFS as GPL so it can be ported to native Linux? If not, is it legal to write

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > >> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal > >> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same > >> process at runtime unless there is an alternate

Hello, I noticed that kbps jumps quite high in -q 10 mode and is nearing lossless compressors. Would it be a difficult task to make OGG a lossless compressor at -q 10? I don't know much about lossy/lossless compression internal logic, so excuse me if my question is out of place. But this would be a really nice feature that would make OGG an "all in one" tool. Cheers, Bostjan

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. I am a programmer, relatively new to GNU/Linux and am looking for cross platform GUI development, mainly for EL5 and Windows. I have found wxWidgets so far. I prefer drag 'n drop programming IDEs, QT seems to provide this for GNU/Linux, but it isn't free for Windows. Does anyone know of any decent GUI cross-platform library for EL5 and Windows with a drag 'n

Sorry if this has been on discussion before, but is anybody working on enabling Vorbis so that it can be used in Windows Media player and friends? Dejan --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in

....c Thu Apr 19 15:44:49 2007 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Thu Apr 19 15:53:44 2007 -0700 @@ -35,6 +35,19 @@ #include <asm/tlbflush.h> #include <asm/timer.h> +/* Modules may need to know if paravirt is active */ +int paravirt_enabled; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_enabled); + +/* GPLd modules might want to determine and call into backend functions */ +char *paravirt_backend = "bare hardware"; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_backend); + +/* Disable PMD sharing; externally set */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE +int use_shared_kernel_pmd = 1; +#endif + /* nop stub */ void _paravirt...

....c Thu Apr 19 15:44:49 2007 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Thu Apr 19 15:53:44 2007 -0700 @@ -35,6 +35,19 @@ #include <asm/tlbflush.h> #include <asm/timer.h> +/* Modules may need to know if paravirt is active */ +int paravirt_enabled; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_enabled); + +/* GPLd modules might want to determine and call into backend functions */ +char *paravirt_backend = "bare hardware"; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_backend); + +/* Disable PMD sharing; externally set */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE +int use_shared_kernel_pmd = 1; +#endif + /* nop stub */ void _paravirt...

Wouldn''t it be great if the opensolaris community creates a fs fzfs (for flash zfs) that could be the the filesystem for SDXC cards? Two main point for this are already there Sun is a member of SD Card Association and the code writting smart on a flash should be there as well with stuff of l2arc. I think that could give the opensolaris a more visiblie/ markting in the IT space and would