On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:11:07AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:> This patch-set deals with an interesting yet stupid problem: code that > does not get inlined despite its simplicity.I got the 0/8 patch twice, and didn't get the 1/8 patch. Was there an issue with the sending of the patches? -- Josh
Reasonably Related Threads
- PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
- [PATCH v2 0/9] x86: macrofying inline asm for better compilation
- [PATCH v8 00/10] x86: macrofying inline asm for better compilation
- [PATCH 0/6] Macrofying inline assembly for better compilation
- [PATCH v4 6/9] x86: prevent inline distortion by paravirt ops
Wisdom of the Ancients
