thr3ads.net - Nouveau - [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage [May 2018]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Kees Cook

2018-May-24 17:24 UTC

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it won't
abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure
out how large the buffer should be.

[1]
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA at
mail.gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c    | 16 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
index a721354249ce..d02e183717dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
@@ -414,6 +414,20 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
 {
 	struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
 	u32 pos = 0;
+	u32 max_desc_size = 0;
+	u8 *gdesc;
+
+	/* Figure out how large we need gdesc to be. */
+	list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
+		const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func +					   
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
+
+		max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size, ls_func->bl_desc_size);
+	}
+
+	gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gdesc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
 
@@ -421,7 +435,6 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct list_head
*imgs,
 		struct ls_ucode_img_r352 *img = ls_ucode_img_r352(_img);
 		const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func  					   
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
-		u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
 
 		nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos, &img->wpr_header,
 				      sizeof(img->wpr_header));
@@ -447,6 +460,8 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct list_head
*imgs,
 
 	nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
 
+	kfree(gdesc);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -771,7 +786,11 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
 	struct fw_bl_desc *hsbl_desc;
 	void *bl, *blob_data, *hsbl_code, *hsbl_data;
 	u32 code_size;
-	u8 bl_desc[bl_desc_size];
+	u8 *bl_desc;
+
+	bl_desc = kzalloc(bl_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!bl_desc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* Find the bootloader descriptor for our blob and copy it */
 	if (blob == acr->load_blob) {
@@ -802,7 +821,6 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
 			      code_size, hsbl_desc->start_tag, 0, false);
 
 	/* Generate the BL header */
-	memset(bl_desc, 0, bl_desc_size);
 	acr->func->generate_hs_bl_desc(load_hdr, bl_desc, offset);
 
 	/*
@@ -811,6 +829,7 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
 	nvkm_falcon_load_dmem(falcon, bl_desc, hsbl_desc->dmem_load_off,
 			      bl_desc_size, 0);
 
+	kfree(bl_desc);
 	return hsbl_desc->start_tag << 8;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
index 866877b88797..978ad0790367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
@@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
 {
 	struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
 	u32 pos = 0;
+	u32 max_desc_size = 0;
+	u8 *gdesc;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
+		const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func +					   
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
+
+		max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size, ls_func->bl_desc_size);
+	}
+
+	gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gdesc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
 
@@ -272,7 +285,6 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct list_head
*imgs,
 		struct ls_ucode_img_r367 *img = ls_ucode_img_r367(_img);
 		const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func  					   
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
-		u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
 
 		nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos, &img->wpr_header,
 				      sizeof(img->wpr_header));
@@ -298,6 +310,8 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct list_head
*imgs,
 
 	nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
 
+	kfree(gdesc);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.0


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Kees Cook

2018-Jun-20 04:45 UTC

head link

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
wrote:> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it won't
> abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure
> out how large the buffer should be.
>
> [1]
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA at
mail.gmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
Friendly ping. Who is best to take this patch?

Thanks!

-Kees
> ---
>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c    | 16 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> index a721354249ce..d02e183717dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,20 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>  {
>         struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
>         u32 pos = 0;
> +       u32 max_desc_size = 0;
> +       u8 *gdesc;
> +
> +       /* Figure out how large we need gdesc to be. */
> +       list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
> +               const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func > +              
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> +
> +               max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size,
ls_func->bl_desc_size);
> +       }
> +
> +       gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gdesc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
>
> @@ -421,7 +435,6 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>                 struct ls_ucode_img_r352 *img = ls_ucode_img_r352(_img);
>                 const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >                
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> -               u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
>
>                 nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos,
&img->wpr_header,
>                                       sizeof(img->wpr_header));
> @@ -447,6 +460,8 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>
>         nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
>
> +       kfree(gdesc);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -771,7 +786,11 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct
nvkm_falcon *falcon,
>         struct fw_bl_desc *hsbl_desc;
>         void *bl, *blob_data, *hsbl_code, *hsbl_data;
>         u32 code_size;
> -       u8 bl_desc[bl_desc_size];
> +       u8 *bl_desc;
> +
> +       bl_desc = kzalloc(bl_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!bl_desc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         /* Find the bootloader descriptor for our blob and copy it */
>         if (blob == acr->load_blob) {
> @@ -802,7 +821,6 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
>                               code_size, hsbl_desc->start_tag, 0,
false);
>
>         /* Generate the BL header */
> -       memset(bl_desc, 0, bl_desc_size);
>         acr->func->generate_hs_bl_desc(load_hdr, bl_desc, offset);
>
>         /*
> @@ -811,6 +829,7 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
>         nvkm_falcon_load_dmem(falcon, bl_desc, hsbl_desc->dmem_load_off,
>                               bl_desc_size, 0);
>
> +       kfree(bl_desc);
>         return hsbl_desc->start_tag << 8;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> index 866877b88797..978ad0790367 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>  {
>         struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
>         u32 pos = 0;
> +       u32 max_desc_size = 0;
> +       u8 *gdesc;
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
> +               const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func > +              
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> +
> +               max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size,
ls_func->bl_desc_size);
> +       }
> +
> +       gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gdesc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
>
> @@ -272,7 +285,6 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>                 struct ls_ucode_img_r367 *img = ls_ucode_img_r367(_img);
>                 const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >                
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> -               u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
>
>                 nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos,
&img->wpr_header,
>                                       sizeof(img->wpr_header));
> @@ -298,6 +310,8 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>
>         nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
>
> +       kfree(gdesc);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Karol Herbst

2018-Jun-22 17:50 UTC

head link

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
wrote:> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it won't
> abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure
> out how large the buffer should be.
>
> [1]
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA at
mail.gmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> ---
>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c    | 16 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> index a721354249ce..d02e183717dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,20 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>  {
>         struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
>         u32 pos = 0;
> +       u32 max_desc_size = 0;
> +       u8 *gdesc;
> +
> +       /* Figure out how large we need gdesc to be. */
> +       list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
> +               const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func > +              
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> +
> +               max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size,
ls_func->bl_desc_size);
> +       }
> +
> +       gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gdesc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
>
> @@ -421,7 +435,6 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>                 struct ls_ucode_img_r352 *img = ls_ucode_img_r352(_img);
>                 const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >                
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> -               u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
>
if there are no guarantees that (ls_func->bl_desc_size & 0x4 == 0),
then we need to memset a bit more, because 4 bytes at the time are
actually copied inside nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to later in that code, but
the last 4 bytes are only partly memset to 0.

If ls_func->bl_desc_size is always a multiple of 0x4, then it isn't as
important, but still better to be fixed. Or maybe
nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to should do that handling and check if the size is
a multiple of 0x4 and otherwise handle that case?

Same is valid for the changes in the r367 file.
>                 nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos,
&img->wpr_header,
>                                       sizeof(img->wpr_header));
> @@ -447,6 +460,8 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>
>         nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
>
> +       kfree(gdesc);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -771,7 +786,11 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct
nvkm_falcon *falcon,
>         struct fw_bl_desc *hsbl_desc;
>         void *bl, *blob_data, *hsbl_code, *hsbl_data;
>         u32 code_size;
> -       u8 bl_desc[bl_desc_size];
> +       u8 *bl_desc;
> +
> +       bl_desc = kzalloc(bl_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!bl_desc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         /* Find the bootloader descriptor for our blob and copy it */
>         if (blob == acr->load_blob) {
> @@ -802,7 +821,6 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
>                               code_size, hsbl_desc->start_tag, 0,
false);
>
>         /* Generate the BL header */
> -       memset(bl_desc, 0, bl_desc_size);
>         acr->func->generate_hs_bl_desc(load_hdr, bl_desc, offset);
>
>         /*
> @@ -811,6 +829,7 @@ acr_r352_load(struct nvkm_acr *_acr, struct nvkm_falcon
*falcon,
>         nvkm_falcon_load_dmem(falcon, bl_desc, hsbl_desc->dmem_load_off,
>                               bl_desc_size, 0);
>
> +       kfree(bl_desc);
>         return hsbl_desc->start_tag << 8;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> index 866877b88797..978ad0790367 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>  {
>         struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
>         u32 pos = 0;
> +       u32 max_desc_size = 0;
> +       u8 *gdesc;
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
> +               const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func > +              
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> +
> +               max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size,
ls_func->bl_desc_size);
> +       }
> +
> +       gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gdesc)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
>         nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
>
> @@ -272,7 +285,6 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>                 struct ls_ucode_img_r367 *img = ls_ucode_img_r367(_img);
>                 const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >                
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
> -               u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
>
>                 nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to(wpr_blob, pos,
&img->wpr_header,
>                                       sizeof(img->wpr_header));
> @@ -298,6 +310,8 @@ acr_r367_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>
>         nvkm_done(wpr_blob);
>
> +       kfree(gdesc);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Kees Cook

2018-Jun-22 21:34 UTC

head link

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com>
wrote:> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
wrote:
>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
>> allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it
won't
>> abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure
>> out how large the buffer should be.
>>
>> [1]
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA at
mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
>>  .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r367.c    | 16 +++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
>> index a721354249ce..d02e183717dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c
>> @@ -414,6 +414,20 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>>  {
>>         struct ls_ucode_img *_img;
>>         u32 pos = 0;
>> +       u32 max_desc_size = 0;
>> +       u8 *gdesc;
>> +
>> +       /* Figure out how large we need gdesc to be. */
>> +       list_for_each_entry(_img, imgs, node) {
>> +               const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >> +      
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
>> +
>> +               max_desc_size = max(max_desc_size,
ls_func->bl_desc_size);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       gdesc = kmalloc(max_desc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!gdesc)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         nvkm_kmap(wpr_blob);
>>
>> @@ -421,7 +435,6 @@ acr_r352_ls_write_wpr(struct acr_r352 *acr, struct
list_head *imgs,
>>                 struct ls_ucode_img_r352 *img =
ls_ucode_img_r352(_img);
>>                 const struct acr_r352_ls_func *ls_func >>        
acr->func->ls_func[_img->falcon_id];
>> -               u8 gdesc[ls_func->bl_desc_size];
>>
>
> if there are no guarantees that (ls_func->bl_desc_size & 0x4 == 0),
> then we need to memset a bit more, because 4 bytes at the time are
> actually copied inside nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to later in that code, but
> the last 4 bytes are only partly memset to 0.
I think this is unchanged from the original code, yes? The memset() is
always against bl_desc_size; I haven't changed that.
> If ls_func->bl_desc_size is always a multiple of 0x4, then it isn't
as
> important, but still better to be fixed. Or maybe
> nvkm_gpuobj_memcpy_to should do that handling and check if the size is
> a multiple of 0x4 and otherwise handle that case?
>
> Same is valid for the changes in the r367 file.
Should I resend with both the allocation and the memset getting
rounded up to the next multiple of 4?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more apparently analagous threads

Nouveau - May 2018 - [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage

Seemingly Similar Threads