llvm dev - Nov 2012 - [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb for i386

For the given test:

class A1 {
  int x;
  int y;

  public:

  A1(int a, int b)
  {
   x=a;
   y=b;
  }

A1 operator+(const A1&);
};


A1 A1::operator+(const A1& second)
{
 A1 sum(0,0);
 sum.x = x + second.x;
 sum.y = y + second.y;

 return (sum);
}


int main (void)
{
 A1 one(2,3);
 A1 two(4,5);

 return 0;
}


when the exectable of this code is debugged in gdb for i386, we dont get the
expected results.

when we break at return 0; and give the command: print one + two, the result
should be $1 = {x = 6, y = 8}, but the result obtained is $1 = {x = 2, y = 3}.

This is related to debug information generated, as normally the overloading is
occuring.
eg: A1 three = one + two results {x = 6, y = 8}.


On checking the assembly, a suspicious entry is found which may be related for
the failure:

    #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:this <- undef
    #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:second <- undef



-- 
Thanx & Regards
*Mayur Pandey *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121129/75068cf8/attachment.html>

Problem seems not only with operator overloading,  It occurs with struct
value returning also.

gdb while debugging expects the return value in eax, gcc does returns in
eax, But Clang returns in edx(it can be checked in gdb by printing the
contents of edx).

Code(sample code)

struct A1 {
  int x;
  int y;
};

A1 sum(const A1 one, const A1 two)
{
 A1 plus = {0,0};
 plus.x = one.x + two.x;
 plus.y = one.y + two.y;

 return (plus);
}


int main (void)
{
 A1 one= {2,3};
 A1 two= {4,5};
 A1 three = sum(one,two);
 return 0;
}


gcc assembley (snippet of sum function)

_Z3sum2A1S_:
    .loc 1 8 0
    pushl    %ebp
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    .loc 1 9 0
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    $0, (%eax)
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    $0, 4(%eax)
    .loc 1 10 0
    movl    12(%ebp), %edx
    movl    20(%ebp), %eax
    addl    %eax, %edx
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    %edx, (%eax)
    .loc 1 11 0
    movl    16(%ebp), %edx
    movl    24(%ebp), %eax
    addl    %eax, %edx
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    %edx, 4(%eax)
.LBE2:
    .loc 1 14 0
    *movl    8(%ebp), %eax*
    popl    %ebp
    ret    $4

clang assembly (snippet of sum function)
_Z3sum2A1S_:
   .loc    1 8 0
    pushl    %edi
    pushl    %esi
    leal    24(%esp), %eax
    leal    16(%esp), %ecx
    movl    12(%esp), %edx
    .loc    1 9 17 prologue_end
    movl    $0, 4(%edx)
    movl    $0, (%edx)
    .loc    1 10 2
    movl    (%ecx), %esi
    movl    (%eax), %edi
    addl    %edi, %esi
    movl    %esi, (%edx)
    .loc    1 11 2
    movl    4(%ecx), %ecx
    movl    4(%eax), %eax
    addl    %eax, %ecx
    *movl    %ecx, 4(%edx)*
    .loc    1 13 2
    popl    %esi
    popl    %edi
    ret    $4


But while returning int value clang returns with eax... as expect. Problem
comes with when used struct/class

Is the behaviour of llvm as per the standards or is this a bug??









On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at
gmail.com>wrote:
> For the given test:
>
> class A1 {
>   int x;
>   int y;
>
>   public:
>
>   A1(int a, int b)
>   {
>    x=a;
>    y=b;
>   }
>
> A1 operator+(const A1&);
> };
>
>
> A1 A1::operator+(const A1& second)
> {
>  A1 sum(0,0);
>  sum.x = x + second.x;
>  sum.y = y + second.y;
>
>  return (sum);
> }
>
>
> int main (void)
> {
>  A1 one(2,3);
>  A1 two(4,5);
>
>  return 0;
> }
>
>
> when the exectable of this code is debugged in gdb for i386, we dont get
the
> expected results.
>
> when we break at return 0; and give the command: print one + two, the
result
> should be $1 = {x = 6, y = 8}, but the result obtained is $1 = {x = 2, y =
3}.
>
> This is related to debug information generated, as normally the overloading
is
> occuring.
> eg: A1 three = one + two results {x = 6, y = 8}.
>
>
> On checking the assembly, a suspicious entry is found which may be related
for
> the failure:
>
>     #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:this <- undef
>     #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:second <- undef
>
>
>
> --
> Thanx & Regards
> *Mayur Pandey *
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Thanx & Regards
*Mayur Pandey *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121201/7ca25356/attachment.html>

Hi,

Structures are passed by pointer, so the return value is not actually in eax.
That code gets transformed into something like:

void sum(A1 *out, const A1 one, const A1 two) {
  out->x = one.x + two.x
  out->y = one.y + two.y
}

So actually the function ends up returning void and operating on a hidden
parameter, so %eax is dead at the end of the function and should not be being
relied upon by the calling code.

I believe this is a red-herring to whatever your actual bug is.

Cheers,

James
________________________________________
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf
Of Mayur Pandey [mayurthebond at gmail.com]
Sent: 01 December 2012 11:13
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb     
for i386

Problem seems not only with operator overloading,  It occurs with struct value
returning also.

gdb while debugging expects the return value in eax, gcc does returns in eax,
But Clang returns in edx(it can be checked in gdb by printing the contents of
edx).

Code(sample code)

struct A1 {
  int x;
  int y;
};

A1 sum(const A1 one, const A1 two)
{
 A1 plus = {0,0};
 plus.x = one.x + two.x;
 plus.y = one.y + two.y;

 return (plus);
}


int main (void)
{
 A1 one= {2,3};
 A1 two= {4,5};
 A1 three = sum(one,two);
 return 0;
}


gcc assembley (snippet of sum function)

_Z3sum2A1S_:
    .loc 1 8 0
    pushl    %ebp
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    .loc 1 9 0
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    $0, (%eax)
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    $0, 4(%eax)
    .loc 1 10 0
    movl    12(%ebp), %edx
    movl    20(%ebp), %eax
    addl    %eax, %edx
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    %edx, (%eax)
    .loc 1 11 0
    movl    16(%ebp), %edx
    movl    24(%ebp), %eax
    addl    %eax, %edx
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    movl    %edx, 4(%eax)
.LBE2:
    .loc 1 14 0
    movl    8(%ebp), %eax
    popl    %ebp
    ret    $4

clang assembly (snippet of sum function)
_Z3sum2A1S_:
   .loc    1 8 0
    pushl    %edi
    pushl    %esi
    leal    24(%esp), %eax
    leal    16(%esp), %ecx
    movl    12(%esp), %edx
    .loc    1 9 17 prologue_end
    movl    $0, 4(%edx)
    movl    $0, (%edx)
    .loc    1 10 2
    movl    (%ecx), %esi
    movl    (%eax), %edi
    addl    %edi, %esi
    movl    %esi, (%edx)
    .loc    1 11 2
    movl    4(%ecx), %ecx
    movl    4(%eax), %eax
    addl    %eax, %ecx
    movl    %ecx, 4(%edx)
    .loc    1 13 2
    popl    %esi
    popl    %edi
    ret    $4


But while returning int value clang returns with eax... as expect. Problem comes
with when used struct/class

Is the behaviour of llvm as per the standards or is this a bug??









On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at
gmail.com<mailto:mayurthebond at gmail.com>> wrote:


For the given test:

class A1 {
  int x;
  int y;

  public:

  A1(int a, int b)
  {
   x=a;
   y=b;
  }

A1 operator+(const A1&);
};


A1 A1::operator+(const A1& second)
{
 A1 sum(0,0);
 sum.x = x + second.x;
 sum.y = y + second.y;

 return (sum);
}


int main (void)
{
 A1 one(2,3);
 A1 two(4,5);

 return 0;
}


when the exectable of this code is debugged in gdb for i386, we dont get the
expected results.

when we break at return 0; and give the command: print one + two, the result
should be $1 = {x = 6, y = 8}, but the result obtained is $1 = {x = 2, y = 3}.

This is related to debug information generated, as normally the overloading is
occuring.
eg: A1 three = one + two results {x = 6, y = 8}.


On checking the assembly, a suspicious entry is found which may be related for
the failure:

    #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:this <- undef
    #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:second <- undef


--
Thanx & Regards
Mayur Pandey








--
Thanx & Regards
Mayur Pandey